All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] hvc_dcc : add support to armv4 and armv5 core
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:57:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201209031257.28213.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5040EAF7.9010003@codeaurora.org>

On Friday 31 August 2012, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > +static int hvc_dcc_put_chars_v6(uint32_t vt, const char *buf, int count)
> > +{
> > +     int i;
> > +
> > +     for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> > +             while (__dcc_getstatus_v6() & DCC_STATUS_TX_V6)
> > +                     cpu_relax();
> > +
> > +             __dcc_putchar_v6(buf[i]);
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return count;
> > +}
> 
> It's unfortunate that the main logic is duplicated. I wonder if we could
> push the runtime decision slightly lower into the accessor functions
> instead and make some new functions dcc_tx_busy() and dcc_rx_busy() or
> something. Then these loops stay the same.

Agreed. Ideally, you should be able to get the code to be compiled into
the same binary as before for ARMv6+. If only the inline assembly differs,
you can do something like

static inline char __dcc_getchar(void)
{
        char __c;

        if (__LINUX_ARM_ARCH >= 6)
		asm volatile("mrc p14, 0, %0, c0, c5, 0 @ read comms data reg"
	                : "=r" (__c));
	else
		asm volatile ("mrc p14, 0, %0, c1, c0  @ read comms data reg"
			: "=r" (ret));
        isb();

        return __c;
}

	Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Matthieu CASTET <castet.matthieu@free.fr>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Matthieu Castet <matthieu.castet@parrot.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hvc_dcc : add support to armv4 and armv5 core
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:57:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201209031257.28213.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5040EAF7.9010003@codeaurora.org>

On Friday 31 August 2012, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > +static int hvc_dcc_put_chars_v6(uint32_t vt, const char *buf, int count)
> > +{
> > +     int i;
> > +
> > +     for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> > +             while (__dcc_getstatus_v6() & DCC_STATUS_TX_V6)
> > +                     cpu_relax();
> > +
> > +             __dcc_putchar_v6(buf[i]);
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return count;
> > +}
> 
> It's unfortunate that the main logic is duplicated. I wonder if we could
> push the runtime decision slightly lower into the accessor functions
> instead and make some new functions dcc_tx_busy() and dcc_rx_busy() or
> something. Then these loops stay the same.

Agreed. Ideally, you should be able to get the code to be compiled into
the same binary as before for ARMv6+. If only the inline assembly differs,
you can do something like

static inline char __dcc_getchar(void)
{
        char __c;

        if (__LINUX_ARM_ARCH >= 6)
		asm volatile("mrc p14, 0, %0, c0, c5, 0 @ read comms data reg"
	                : "=r" (__c));
	else
		asm volatile ("mrc p14, 0, %0, c1, c0  @ read comms data reg"
			: "=r" (ret));
        isb();

        return __c;
}

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-03 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-31 11:47 [PATCH v2] hvc_dcc : add support to armv4 and armv5 core Matthieu CASTET
2012-08-31 11:47 ` Matthieu CASTET
2012-08-31 16:48 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-08-31 16:48   ` Stephen Boyd
2012-09-03 12:57   ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2012-09-03 12:57     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-25 15:35     ` Matthieu CASTET
2012-09-25 15:35       ` Matthieu CASTET
2012-09-25 15:44       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-25 15:44         ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-25 17:37         ` matthieu castet
2012-09-25 17:37           ` matthieu castet
2012-09-25 15:40   ` Matthieu CASTET
2012-09-25 15:40     ` Matthieu CASTET

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201209031257.28213.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.