All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: qiuxishi <qiuxishi@gmail.com>
Cc: mgorman@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com,
	qiuxishi@huawei.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] memory-hotplug: bug fix race between isolation and allocation
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 11:59:12 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120906025912.GE31615@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50480BFB.8050501@gmail.com>

Hello Xishi,

On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:35:39AM +0800, qiuxishi wrote:
> On 2012/9/5 17:40, Mel Gorman wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 04:26:02PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >> Like below, memory-hotplug makes race between page-isolation
> >> and page-allocation so it can hit BUG_ON in __offline_isolated_pages.
> >>
> >> 	CPU A					CPU B
> >>
> >> start_isolate_page_range
> >> set_migratetype_isolate
> >> spin_lock_irqsave(zone->lock)
> >>
> >> 				free_hot_cold_page(Page A)
> >> 				/* without zone->lock */
> >> 				migratetype = get_pageblock_migratetype(Page A);
> >> 				/*
> >> 				 * Page could be moved into MIGRATE_MOVABLE
> >> 				 * of per_cpu_pages
> >> 				 */
> >> 				list_add_tail(&page->lru, &pcp->lists[migratetype]);
> >>
> >> set_pageblock_isolate
> >> move_freepages_block
> >> drain_all_pages
> 
> I think here is the problem you want to fix, it is not sure that pcp will be moved
> into MIGRATE_ISOLATE list. They may be moved into MIGRATE_MOVABLE list because
> page_private() maybe 2, it uses page_private() not get_pageblock_migratetype()
> 
> So when finish migrating pages, the free pages from pcp may be allocated again, and
> failed in check_pages_isolated().
> 
> drain_all_pages()
> 	drain_local_pages()
> 		drain_pages()
> 			free_pcppages_bulk()
> 				__free_one_page(page, zone, 0, page_private(page))
> 
> I reported this problem too. http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=134555113706068&w=2
> How about this change:
> 	free_pcppages_bulk()
> 		__free_one_page(page, zone, 0, get_pageblock_migratetype(page))

I already explained why it was not good solution.
Again, here it goes from my previous reply.

"
Anyway, I don't like your approach which I already considered because it hurts hotpath
while the race is really unlikely. Get_pageblock_migratetype is never trivial.
We should avoid the overhead in hotpath and move into memory-hotplug itself.
Do you see my patch in https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1225081/ ?
"

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: qiuxishi <qiuxishi@gmail.com>
Cc: mgorman@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com,
	qiuxishi@huawei.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] memory-hotplug: bug fix race between isolation and allocation
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 11:59:12 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120906025912.GE31615@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50480BFB.8050501@gmail.com>

Hello Xishi,

On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:35:39AM +0800, qiuxishi wrote:
> On 2012/9/5 17:40, Mel Gorman wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 04:26:02PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >> Like below, memory-hotplug makes race between page-isolation
> >> and page-allocation so it can hit BUG_ON in __offline_isolated_pages.
> >>
> >> 	CPU A					CPU B
> >>
> >> start_isolate_page_range
> >> set_migratetype_isolate
> >> spin_lock_irqsave(zone->lock)
> >>
> >> 				free_hot_cold_page(Page A)
> >> 				/* without zone->lock */
> >> 				migratetype = get_pageblock_migratetype(Page A);
> >> 				/*
> >> 				 * Page could be moved into MIGRATE_MOVABLE
> >> 				 * of per_cpu_pages
> >> 				 */
> >> 				list_add_tail(&page->lru, &pcp->lists[migratetype]);
> >>
> >> set_pageblock_isolate
> >> move_freepages_block
> >> drain_all_pages
> 
> I think here is the problem you want to fix, it is not sure that pcp will be moved
> into MIGRATE_ISOLATE list. They may be moved into MIGRATE_MOVABLE list because
> page_private() maybe 2, it uses page_private() not get_pageblock_migratetype()
> 
> So when finish migrating pages, the free pages from pcp may be allocated again, and
> failed in check_pages_isolated().
> 
> drain_all_pages()
> 	drain_local_pages()
> 		drain_pages()
> 			free_pcppages_bulk()
> 				__free_one_page(page, zone, 0, page_private(page))
> 
> I reported this problem too. http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=134555113706068&w=2
> How about this change:
> 	free_pcppages_bulk()
> 		__free_one_page(page, zone, 0, get_pageblock_migratetype(page))

I already explained why it was not good solution.
Again, here it goes from my previous reply.

"
Anyway, I don't like your approach which I already considered because it hurts hotpath
while the race is really unlikely. Get_pageblock_migratetype is never trivial.
We should avoid the overhead in hotpath and move into memory-hotplug itself.
Do you see my patch in https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1225081/ ?
"

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-06  2:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-06  2:35 [PATCH 3/3] memory-hotplug: bug fix race between isolation and allocation qiuxishi
2012-09-06  2:35 ` qiuxishi
2012-09-06  2:59 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2012-09-06  2:59   ` Minchan Kim
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-09-05  7:25 [PATCH 0/3] memory-hotplug: handle page race between allocation and isolation Minchan Kim
2012-09-05  7:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] memory-hotplug: bug fix race between isolation and allocation Minchan Kim
2012-09-05  7:26   ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-05  9:40   ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-05  9:40     ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-06  4:49     ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-06  4:49       ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-06  9:24       ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-06  9:24         ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-06 23:32         ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-06 23:32           ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-07  6:26   ` jencce zhou
2012-09-07  6:26     ` jencce zhou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120906025912.GE31615@bbox \
    --to=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=qiuxishi@gmail.com \
    --cc=qiuxishi@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.