From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
To: Guo Chao <yan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/13] vfs: pull ext4's double-i_mutex-locking into common code
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 09:49:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120906134947.GA13533@pad.fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120906025358.GA6679@yanx>
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:53:58AM +0800, Guo Chao wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 04:55:12PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * lock_two_nondirectories - release locks from lock_two_nondirectories()
> unlock_two_nondirectories
>
> > + * @inode1: first inode to unlock
> > + * @inode2: second inode to lock
> unlock
>
Both fixed, thanks!
--b.
commit d190216f0b6c4623f9c23e2c7fb2e2fa9009891f
Author: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Apr 18 15:16:33 2012 -0400
vfs: pull ext4's double-i_mutex-locking into common code
We want to do this elsewhere as well.
Also, compare pointers instead of inode numbers.
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
diff --git a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
index c5826c6..b87d94a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
@@ -1086,19 +1086,7 @@ mext_inode_double_lock(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2)
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
- if (inode1 == inode2) {
- mutex_lock(&inode1->i_mutex);
- goto out;
- }
-
- if (inode1->i_ino < inode2->i_ino) {
- mutex_lock_nested(&inode1->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
- mutex_lock_nested(&inode2->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
- } else {
- mutex_lock_nested(&inode2->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
- mutex_lock_nested(&inode1->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
- }
-
+ lock_two_nondirectories(inode1, inode2);
out:
return ret;
}
@@ -1123,12 +1111,7 @@ mext_inode_double_unlock(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2)
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
- if (inode1)
- mutex_unlock(&inode1->i_mutex);
-
- if (inode2 && inode2 != inode1)
- mutex_unlock(&inode2->i_mutex);
-
+ unlock_two_nondirectories(inode1, inode2);
out:
return ret;
}
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index ac8d904..275f571 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -969,6 +969,42 @@ void unlock_new_inode(struct inode *inode)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlock_new_inode);
/**
+ * lock_two_nondirectories - take two i_mutexes on non-directory objects
+ * @inode1: first inode to lock; must be non-NULL
+ * @inode2: second inode to lock; optional, may equal first or be NULL.
+ */
+void lock_two_nondirectories(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2)
+{
+ if (inode1 == inode2 || inode2 == NULL)
+ mutex_lock(&inode1->i_mutex);
+ else if (inode1 < inode2) {
+ mutex_lock_nested(&inode1->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
+ mutex_lock_nested(&inode2->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
+
+ } else {
+ mutex_lock_nested(&inode2->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
+ mutex_lock_nested(&inode1->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
+ }
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(lock_two_nondirectories);
+
+/**
+ * unlock_two_nondirectories - release locks from lock_two_nondirectories()
+ * @inode1: first inode to unlock
+ * @inode2: second inode to unlock
+ *
+ * Arguments must be same as those given to corresponding
+ * lock_two_nondirectories() call.
+ */
+void unlock_two_nondirectories(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2)
+{
+ mutex_unlock(&inode1->i_mutex);
+ if (inode2 && inode2 != inode1)
+ mutex_unlock(&inode2->i_mutex);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlock_two_nondirectories);
+
+/**
* iget5_locked - obtain an inode from a mounted file system
* @sb: super block of file system
* @hashval: hash value (usually inode number) to get
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index aa11047..a179b69 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -895,6 +895,9 @@ enum inode_i_mutex_lock_class
I_MUTEX_QUOTA
};
+void lock_two_nondirectories(struct inode *, struct inode*);
+void unlock_two_nondirectories(struct inode *, struct inode*);
+
/*
* NOTE: in a 32bit arch with a preemptable kernel and
* an UP compile the i_size_read/write must be atomic
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Guo Chao <yan-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>,
linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org>,
Andreas Dilger
<adilger.kernel-m1MBpc4rdrD3fQ9qLvQP4Q@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/13] vfs: pull ext4's double-i_mutex-locking into common code
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 09:49:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120906134947.GA13533@pad.fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120906025358.GA6679@yanx>
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:53:58AM +0800, Guo Chao wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 04:55:12PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * lock_two_nondirectories - release locks from lock_two_nondirectories()
> unlock_two_nondirectories
>
> > + * @inode1: first inode to unlock
> > + * @inode2: second inode to lock
> unlock
>
Both fixed, thanks!
--b.
commit d190216f0b6c4623f9c23e2c7fb2e2fa9009891f
Author: J. Bruce Fields <bfields-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date: Wed Apr 18 15:16:33 2012 -0400
vfs: pull ext4's double-i_mutex-locking into common code
We want to do this elsewhere as well.
Also, compare pointers instead of inode numbers.
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel-m1MBpc4rdrD3fQ9qLvQP4Q@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
diff --git a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
index c5826c6..b87d94a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
@@ -1086,19 +1086,7 @@ mext_inode_double_lock(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2)
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
- if (inode1 == inode2) {
- mutex_lock(&inode1->i_mutex);
- goto out;
- }
-
- if (inode1->i_ino < inode2->i_ino) {
- mutex_lock_nested(&inode1->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
- mutex_lock_nested(&inode2->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
- } else {
- mutex_lock_nested(&inode2->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
- mutex_lock_nested(&inode1->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
- }
-
+ lock_two_nondirectories(inode1, inode2);
out:
return ret;
}
@@ -1123,12 +1111,7 @@ mext_inode_double_unlock(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2)
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
- if (inode1)
- mutex_unlock(&inode1->i_mutex);
-
- if (inode2 && inode2 != inode1)
- mutex_unlock(&inode2->i_mutex);
-
+ unlock_two_nondirectories(inode1, inode2);
out:
return ret;
}
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index ac8d904..275f571 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -969,6 +969,42 @@ void unlock_new_inode(struct inode *inode)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlock_new_inode);
/**
+ * lock_two_nondirectories - take two i_mutexes on non-directory objects
+ * @inode1: first inode to lock; must be non-NULL
+ * @inode2: second inode to lock; optional, may equal first or be NULL.
+ */
+void lock_two_nondirectories(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2)
+{
+ if (inode1 == inode2 || inode2 == NULL)
+ mutex_lock(&inode1->i_mutex);
+ else if (inode1 < inode2) {
+ mutex_lock_nested(&inode1->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
+ mutex_lock_nested(&inode2->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
+
+ } else {
+ mutex_lock_nested(&inode2->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
+ mutex_lock_nested(&inode1->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
+ }
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(lock_two_nondirectories);
+
+/**
+ * unlock_two_nondirectories - release locks from lock_two_nondirectories()
+ * @inode1: first inode to unlock
+ * @inode2: second inode to unlock
+ *
+ * Arguments must be same as those given to corresponding
+ * lock_two_nondirectories() call.
+ */
+void unlock_two_nondirectories(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2)
+{
+ mutex_unlock(&inode1->i_mutex);
+ if (inode2 && inode2 != inode1)
+ mutex_unlock(&inode2->i_mutex);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlock_two_nondirectories);
+
+/**
* iget5_locked - obtain an inode from a mounted file system
* @sb: super block of file system
* @hashval: hash value (usually inode number) to get
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index aa11047..a179b69 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -895,6 +895,9 @@ enum inode_i_mutex_lock_class
I_MUTEX_QUOTA
};
+void lock_two_nondirectories(struct inode *, struct inode*);
+void unlock_two_nondirectories(struct inode *, struct inode*);
+
/*
* NOTE: in a 32bit arch with a preemptable kernel and
* an UP compile the i_size_read/write must be atomic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-06 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-05 20:55 [RFC PATCH 00/13] Implement NFSv4 delegations, take 4 J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 01/13] gfs2: Get rid of I_MUTEX_QUOTA usage J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-06 14:27 ` Steven Whitehouse
2012-09-06 14:27 ` Steven Whitehouse
2012-09-06 17:08 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 02/13] vfs: pull ext4's double-i_mutex-locking into common code J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-06 2:53 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-06 13:49 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2012-09-06 13:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 03/13] vfs: don't use PARENT/CHILD lock classes for non-directories J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 04/13] vfs: rename I_MUTEX_QUOTA now that it's not used for quotas J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 05/13] vfs: take i_mutex on renamed file J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-06 3:05 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-06 3:05 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-06 17:51 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-06 17:51 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-07 2:27 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-07 2:27 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-07 21:39 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-07 21:39 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-10 2:40 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-10 2:40 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-10 5:10 ` Ram Pai
2012-09-10 5:10 ` Ram Pai
2012-09-10 6:37 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-10 6:37 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-10 7:27 ` Ram Pai
2013-02-14 2:01 ` Al Viro
2012-09-10 14:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 06/13] locks: introduce new FL_DELEG lock flag J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 07/13] locks: implement delegations J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 08/13] namei: minor vfs_unlink cleanup J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 09/13] locks: break delegations on unlink J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 10/13] locks: helper functions for delegation breaking J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 11/13] locks: break delegations on rename J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 12/13] locks: break delegations on link J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 21:02 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-06 11:01 ` Jeff Layton
2012-09-06 13:33 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-06 13:33 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-05 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 13/13] locks: break delegations on any attribute modification J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120906134947.GA13533@pad.fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.