All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: 3.6-rc4 audit_log_d_path oops.
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 12:45:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120906164536.GB30220@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jL8_qDO2QfoL7SbWjrHuta8x8Xxsyt8iOevhKPnip_+=w@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:32:49AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
 > > I just realised, the funny thing about this is that the machine running that test
 > > had selinux/audit disabled. And yet here we are, screwing around with audit buffers.
 > 
 > The intent was to have this message show up in dmesg even if auditd
 > wasn't running, and even if the specific process wasn't being
 > explicitly audited.
 > 
 > > Should there be a test on audit_enable=0 in audit_log_link_denied() ?
 > >
 > > I'm now curious how much more of the audit code is getting run through similar lack of tests
 > 
 > What is the condition in which audit_log_start fails?

in the case of that oops, given I had booted with audit=0, I suspect it was hitting the first check...

1157         if (audit_initialized != AUDIT_INITIALIZED)
1158                 return NULL;
 
	Dave


  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-06 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-06 13:46 3.6-rc4 audit_log_d_path oops Dave Jones
2012-09-06 15:08 ` Check all returns from audit_log_start Dave Jones
2012-09-06 15:36   ` Eric Paris
2012-09-06 15:47     ` Dave Jones
2012-09-06 15:56       ` Dave Jones
2012-09-06 15:16 ` 3.6-rc4 audit_log_d_path oops Dave Jones
2012-09-06 15:34   ` Eric Paris
2012-09-06 16:32   ` Kees Cook
2012-09-06 16:45     ` Dave Jones [this message]
2012-09-06 17:50       ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120906164536.GB30220@redhat.com \
    --to=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.