Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] X86/XEN: Merge x86_init.paging.pagetable_setup_start and x86_init.paging.pagetable_setup_done setup functions and document its semantic

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>]

> > > The overall result is basically the same, but it's way simpler to look
> > > at obvious and well done patches than checking whether a subtle copy
> > > and paste bug happened in 3/5 of the first version. Copy and paste is
> > > the #1 cause for subtle bugs. :)
> > > 
> > > I'm waiting for the ack of Xen folks before taking it into tip.

In case you are waiting for that - Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> > 
> > I've some extra patches that modify the new "paginig_init" in the Xen
> > code that I am going to propose for v3.7 - so will have some merge
> > conflicts. Let me figure that out and also run this set of patches
> > (and also the previous one .. which I think you didn't have a
> > chance to look since you were on vacation?) on an overnight
> 
> Which previous one ?
> 
> > test to make sure there are no fallout.
> > 
> > With the merge issues that are going to prop up (x86 tip tree
> > and my tree in linux-next) should I just take these patches
> > in my tree with your Ack? Or should I just ingest your tiptree
> > in my tree and that way solve the merge issue? What's your
> > preference!
> 
> Having it in tip in an extra branch which you pull into your
> tree. That's the easiest one.

ping? Which branch should I pull?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx