From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Cc: ola.o.lilja@stericsson.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
linus.walleij@stericsson.com, arnd@arndb.de,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, olalilja@yahoo.se,
STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com, lrg@ti.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] mfd: ab8500-core: Apply the AB8500 CODEC's compatible string to its MFD cell
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:05:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120914160506.GE12893@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120730132422.GW16859@sortiz-mobl>
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 03:24:22PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 09:28:07PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 03:36:33PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:38:51PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > > > Provide a compatible string for the AB8500 CODEC to aid in
> > > > configuration property look-up from its associated Device Tree
> > > > node.
> >
> > > Applied as well.
> >
> > I remain *deeply* unconvinced that this is tasteful design for the
> > device tree bindings, and it's certainly not needed urgently for v3.6 as
> > there's no DT bindings on the CODEC side.
> Fair enough, I'll keep this one for the next merge window.
Chasing this, as it still doesn't appear in v3.7 -next.
Kind regards,
Lee
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] mfd: ab8500-core: Apply the AB8500 CODEC's compatible string to its MFD cell
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:05:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120914160506.GE12893@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120730132422.GW16859@sortiz-mobl>
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 03:24:22PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 09:28:07PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 03:36:33PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:38:51PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > > > Provide a compatible string for the AB8500 CODEC to aid in
> > > > configuration property look-up from its associated Device Tree
> > > > node.
> >
> > > Applied as well.
> >
> > I remain *deeply* unconvinced that this is tasteful design for the
> > device tree bindings, and it's certainly not needed urgently for v3.6 as
> > there's no DT bindings on the CODEC side.
> Fair enough, I'll keep this one for the next merge window.
Chasing this, as it still doesn't appear in v3.7 -next.
Kind regards,
Lee
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com,
linus.walleij@stericsson.com, arnd@arndb.de, olalilja@yahoo.se,
ola.o.lilja@stericsson.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
lrg@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] mfd: ab8500-core: Apply the AB8500 CODEC's compatible string to its MFD cell
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:05:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120914160506.GE12893@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120730132422.GW16859@sortiz-mobl>
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 03:24:22PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 09:28:07PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 03:36:33PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:38:51PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > > > Provide a compatible string for the AB8500 CODEC to aid in
> > > > configuration property look-up from its associated Device Tree
> > > > node.
> >
> > > Applied as well.
> >
> > I remain *deeply* unconvinced that this is tasteful design for the
> > device tree bindings, and it's certainly not needed urgently for v3.6 as
> > there's no DT bindings on the CODEC side.
> Fair enough, I'll keep this one for the next merge window.
Chasing this, as it still doesn't appear in v3.7 -next.
Kind regards,
Lee
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-14 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-27 12:38 [PATCH 0/7] Bugfixes and clean-ups bound for the v3.6 RCs Lee Jones
2012-07-27 12:38 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-27 12:38 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-27 12:38 ` [PATCH 1/7] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too Lee Jones
2012-07-27 12:38 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-29 20:25 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-29 20:25 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-29 20:25 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-27 12:38 ` [PATCH 2/7] ASoC: ab8500: Inform SoC Core that we have our own I/O arrangements Lee Jones
2012-07-27 12:38 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-27 12:38 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-27 12:38 ` [PATCH 3/7] mfd: db8500-prcmu: Ensure AB8500 platform data is passed through MFD Core Lee Jones
2012-07-27 12:38 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-27 12:38 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-27 13:36 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-07-27 13:36 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-07-27 12:38 ` [PATCH 4/7] mfd: ab8500-core: Apply the AB8500 CODEC's compatible string to its MFD cell Lee Jones
2012-07-27 12:38 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-27 12:38 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-27 13:36 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-07-27 13:36 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-07-29 20:28 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-29 20:28 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-29 20:28 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-30 13:24 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-07-30 13:24 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-09-14 16:05 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2012-09-14 16:05 ` Lee Jones
2012-09-14 16:05 ` Lee Jones
2012-09-19 11:28 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-09-19 11:28 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-07-27 12:38 ` [PATCH 5/7] ARM: ux500: Remove unused snowball_of_platform_devs struct Lee Jones
2012-07-27 12:38 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-27 12:38 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-27 12:38 ` [PATCH 6/7] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, so such struct 'snd_soc_u8500' Lee Jones
2012-07-27 12:38 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-27 12:38 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-27 12:38 ` [PATCH 7/7] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled Lee Jones
2012-07-27 12:38 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120914160506.GE12893@gmail.com \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
--cc=ola.o.lilja@stericsson.com \
--cc=olalilja@yahoo.se \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.