[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 02/11] S3C24XX: Add core support for Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs

[Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>]

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 08:25:25PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves,
> 
> > Hi Marek,
> > 
> > On 14-09-2012 19:03, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves,
> > > 
> > > It's getting better :)
> > 
> > Hopefully :-)
> > 
> > > [...]
> > > 
> > >> +
> > >> +typedef ulong(*getfreq) (void);
> > > 
> > > Is this used?
> > 
> > In the array declaration bellow...
> 
> Why, these are only values, no ?

They're function pointers.  If they were values the compiler should
complain, because "getfreq" is used as the type of the array.

> > >> +static const getfreq freq_f[] = {
> > > 
> > > const array const members, no?
> > 
> > Do you mean I should declare it like this:
> > 
> > static const getfreq const freq[] = { ...
> 
> Yes

Why?  When can you ever change what an array (not a pointer) points to?

> > I don't see the point because an array has no other storage besides it's
> > elements. Moreover GCC generates the same object code in both ways.
> 
> Type checking, if you ever decided to write into the array, it'll prevent you 
> from doing so.

The first const takes care of that.

-Scott