From: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
To: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
dwalker@fifo99.com, bryanh@codeaurora.org,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] msm: clock: fix return value check in msm_clock_init()
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:44:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120921184418.GB25508@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPgLHd9Fx-y8oqy0Ux85AUA9fbYvJYjS=FLs7z+ivdqOVtLqhQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 02:23:13PM +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
>
> In case of error, the function clk_get() returns ERR_PTR() not
> NULL pointer. The NULL test in return value check should be
> replaced with IS_ERR().
>
> dpatch engine is used to auto generated this patch.
> (https://github.com/weiyj/dpatch)
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-msm/clock.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock.c
> index d9145df..fd52891 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock.c
> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ void __init msm_clock_init(struct clk_lookup *clock_tbl, unsigned num_clocks)
> mutex_unlock(&clocks_mutex);
>
> ebi1_clk = clk_get(NULL, "ebi1_clk");
> - BUG_ON(ebi1_clk == NULL);
> + BUG_ON(IS_ERR(ebi1_clk));
It looks like this code is being removed entirely by a patch that just
was sent out by Stephen Boyd. Stephen, can you make sure that this
gets included if this comes back, but for now I think this is already
taken care of.
Thanks,
David
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: davidb@codeaurora.org (David Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] msm: clock: fix return value check in msm_clock_init()
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:44:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120921184418.GB25508@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPgLHd9Fx-y8oqy0Ux85AUA9fbYvJYjS=FLs7z+ivdqOVtLqhQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 02:23:13PM +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
>
> In case of error, the function clk_get() returns ERR_PTR() not
> NULL pointer. The NULL test in return value check should be
> replaced with IS_ERR().
>
> dpatch engine is used to auto generated this patch.
> (https://github.com/weiyj/dpatch)
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-msm/clock.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock.c
> index d9145df..fd52891 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock.c
> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ void __init msm_clock_init(struct clk_lookup *clock_tbl, unsigned num_clocks)
> mutex_unlock(&clocks_mutex);
>
> ebi1_clk = clk_get(NULL, "ebi1_clk");
> - BUG_ON(ebi1_clk == NULL);
> + BUG_ON(IS_ERR(ebi1_clk));
It looks like this code is being removed entirely by a patch that just
was sent out by Stephen Boyd. Stephen, can you make sure that this
gets included if this comes back, but for now I think this is already
taken care of.
Thanks,
David
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-21 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-21 6:23 [PATCH] msm: clock: fix return value check in msm_clock_init() Wei Yongjun
2012-09-21 6:23 ` Wei Yongjun
2012-09-21 18:44 ` David Brown [this message]
2012-09-21 18:44 ` David Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120921184418.GB25508@codeaurora.org \
--to=davidb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bryanh@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dwalker@fifo99.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=weiyj.lk@gmail.com \
--cc=yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.