Re: [PATCH v1 0/8]: PVH (PV guest with extensions)u

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>]

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:29:51AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 04:16:29PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> > > Hi guys,
> > > 
> > > Ok, I've made all the changes from prev RFC patch submission. Tested
> > > all the combinations. The patches are a bit smaller from before, and
> > > couldn't be separated like before, so I can't state whats different in
> > > each patch. But, it's not too bad to review now.
> > > 
> > > As before, they were built on top of
> > > fc6bdb59a501740b28ed3b616641a22c8dc5dd31 from the following tree:
> > >         
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> 
> I took them for a spin over the weekend and stuck them on top of my
> #linux-next - 
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git linux-next-pvh
> 
> which worked well as PV guest (dom0, domU, etc). It didn't do too well
> as PVHVM guest, but that might be just that some of the 'if (xen..)'
> are properly not set or I mismerged badly. The later is probably likely as
> I did screw it up at least twice (as you can see from my log).
> 
> Hm, let me give them also a whirl on top of fc6bdb59a501740b28ed3b616641a22c8dc5dd31

And with 3683243b2c551e58082b179fd153c7d43ddc503b applied on top of it
I boots just fine. So I had to mess up the merge somehow.

> 
> > 
> > The patch series is not in a bad state. It is reasonable to aim for a
> > merge in 3.8.
> > At least the xen_remap_domain_mfn_range, ballooning and privcmd changes,
> > which interfaces are going to be shared with Xen on ARM ;-)