From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: NFS <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Inconsistency when mounting a directory that 'world' cannot access.
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:38:10 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121002123810.15bd1ee2@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121001154309.GD18400@fieldses.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2646 bytes --]
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:43:10 -0400 "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:23:29AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> >
> > Suppose that on an NFS server I have a directory
> > /foo/bar/baz
> >
> > which I export, and that /foo/bar does not have world access. e.g.
> > permissions are '750' and everyone who owns files in there is a member of the
> > group which owns /foo/bar.
> >
> > Then with NFSv3 I can
> > mount server:/foo/bar/baz /somewhere
> > because the lookup of /foo/bar/baz happens as root on the server in mountd.
> >
> > With NFSv4 using 'sec=sys' I can only do this if I export with
> > "no_root_squash", as the lookup happens on the client as root, and if root
> > were squashed, it wouldn't have access beyond /foo/bar.
> >
> > But if I use NFSv4 using 'sec=krb5', the lookup happens on the client using a
> > machine credential which gets mapped to 'nobody/nogroup' (or whatever anonuid
> > and anongid are set to for the export). So I cannot perform the mount at all.
> >
> > This is - at best - inconsistent and can cause confusion (hey - I was
> > confused for a while there).
> >
> > Should something be done? Can anything be done?
>
> I think nfsd_lookup_dentry() would need a special exception for the
> NFSEXP_V4ROOT case.
I don't think that would help in general.
If I export /foo and want to mount /foo/bar/baz, then for the last lookup at
least, NFSEXP_V4ROOT isn't set anywhere near.
An exception would need to be made for every 'nfs4_lookup_dentry', provided
it found a directory, or nothing (or a symlink...). Possibly this could only
be done for anonymous credentials (as are used by the nfs4 mount operation).
It would be nice if we could clearly differentiate a mount-time lookup from a
regular lookup, but I don't think the protocol allows for that.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
>
> Looks like the directory permission check is actually done in
> lookup_one_len(), so we'd need to either call something else or
> temporarily swap credentials?
>
> --b.
>
> >
> > I lean towards thinking that the most restrictive behaviour is most correct
> > (though I have a customer who feels that it is too restrictive).
> >
> > Should the NFSv4 client always use an anon credential when performing the
> > 'mount'? Is that even possible for auth_sys?
> > Should rpc.mountd use set_fsuid before doing the path lookup to ensure that
> > everyone has access to the exported directory?
> >
> > Or is there some way 'mount' lookups for krb5 could be treated as being
> > performed by root?
> >
> > Any ideas?
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-02 2:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-18 1:23 Inconsistency when mounting a directory that 'world' cannot access NeilBrown
2012-10-01 15:43 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-02 2:38 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2012-10-02 14:33 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-03 3:46 ` NeilBrown
2012-10-03 15:13 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-03 15:48 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-10-03 16:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-03 22:46 ` NeilBrown
2012-10-04 16:07 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-08 6:03 ` NeilBrown
2012-10-08 11:42 ` Steve Dickson
2012-10-08 12:20 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-09 0:30 ` NeilBrown
2012-10-08 12:19 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-08 13:54 ` Malahal Naineni
2012-10-08 14:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-08 15:26 ` Malahal Naineni
2012-10-09 0:33 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121002123810.15bd1ee2@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.