All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: NFS <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Inconsistency when mounting a directory that 'world' cannot access.
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 10:33:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121002143334.GA1435@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121002123810.15bd1ee2@notabene.brown>

On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 12:38:10PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:43:10 -0400 "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:23:29AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> > > 
> > > Suppose that on an NFS server I have a directory
> > >    /foo/bar/baz
> > > 
> > > which I export, and that /foo/bar does not have world access.  e.g.
> > > permissions are '750' and everyone who owns files in there is a member of the
> > > group which owns /foo/bar.
> > > 
> > > Then with NFSv3 I can
> > >   mount server:/foo/bar/baz  /somewhere
> > > because the lookup of /foo/bar/baz happens as root on the server in mountd.
> > > 
> > > With NFSv4 using 'sec=sys' I can only do this if I export with
> > > "no_root_squash", as the lookup happens on the client as root, and if root
> > > were squashed, it wouldn't have access beyond /foo/bar.
> > > 
> > > But if I use NFSv4 using 'sec=krb5', the lookup happens on the client using a
> > > machine credential which gets mapped to 'nobody/nogroup' (or whatever anonuid
> > > and anongid are set to for the export).  So I cannot perform the mount at all.
> > > 
> > > This is - at best - inconsistent and can cause confusion (hey - I was
> > > confused for a while there).
> > > 
> > > Should something be done?  Can anything be done?
> > 
> > I think nfsd_lookup_dentry() would need a special exception for the
> > NFSEXP_V4ROOT case.
> 
> I don't think that would help in general.
> If I export /foo and want to mount /foo/bar/baz, then for the last lookup at
> least, NFSEXP_V4ROOT isn't set anywhere near.

I'm not entirely clear why mountd even allows that, but no point trying
to change it now anyway.

> An exception would need to be made for every 'nfs4_lookup_dentry', provided
> it found a directory, or nothing (or a symlink...).  Possibly this could only
> be done for anonymous credentials (as are used by the nfs4 mount operation).

Yuch.

> It would be nice if we could clearly differentiate a mount-time lookup from a
> regular lookup, but I don't think the protocol allows for that.

I guess you're right.  So it starts to sound more like: "you have a
confusing setup.  Your export configuration says one thing, and your
filesystem permissions say another.  Under NFSv3 the confusion didn't
matter, but now it does--time to fix it."

--b.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-02 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-18  1:23 Inconsistency when mounting a directory that 'world' cannot access NeilBrown
2012-10-01 15:43 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-02  2:38   ` NeilBrown
2012-10-02 14:33     ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2012-10-03  3:46       ` NeilBrown
2012-10-03 15:13         ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-03 15:48           ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-10-03 16:27             ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-03 22:46               ` NeilBrown
2012-10-04 16:07                 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-08  6:03                   ` NeilBrown
2012-10-08 11:42                     ` Steve Dickson
2012-10-08 12:20                       ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-09  0:30                       ` NeilBrown
2012-10-08 12:19                     ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-08 13:54                     ` Malahal Naineni
2012-10-08 14:18                       ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-08 15:26                         ` Malahal Naineni
2012-10-09  0:33                           ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121002143334.GA1435@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.