From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
aarcange@redhat.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] THP support for Sparc64
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:36:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121005143644.abb14c2b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121004.154624.923241475790311926.davem@davemloft.net>
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 15:46:24 -0400 (EDT)
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> Changes since V1:
>
> 1) Respun against mmotm
>
> 2) Bug fix for pgtable allocation, need real locking instead of
> just preemption disabling.
>
> Andrew, you can probably take patch #5 in this series and combine
> it into:
>
> mm-thp-fix-the-update_mmu_cache-last-argument-passing-in-mm-huge_memoryc.patch
>
> in your batch. And finally add a NOP implementation for S390
> and any other huge page supporting architectures.
>
David, I don't know what to do until there's some clarity on the
numa/sched changes. Andrea has a new autonuma patchset, Peter's code
is in -next and I don't know if it's planned for 3.7 merging. And I
suspect (hope) that it won't be merged if that is indeed planned.
Two days I asked what's going on and didn't get told. I put the entire
MM merge on hold yesterday and went off to do other things. At present
I plan to restage MM against mainline and send it all along to Linus on
Monday. If that happens and if you wish that the sparc changes be
merged for 3.7, I suggest that you rebase and retest on Tuesday and ask
Linus to pull it, with my ack.
Sorry.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
aarcange@redhat.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] THP support for Sparc64
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 21:36:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121005143644.abb14c2b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121004.154624.923241475790311926.davem@davemloft.net>
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 15:46:24 -0400 (EDT)
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> Changes since V1:
>
> 1) Respun against mmotm
>
> 2) Bug fix for pgtable allocation, need real locking instead of
> just preemption disabling.
>
> Andrew, you can probably take patch #5 in this series and combine
> it into:
>
> mm-thp-fix-the-update_mmu_cache-last-argument-passing-in-mm-huge_memoryc.patch
>
> in your batch. And finally add a NOP implementation for S390
> and any other huge page supporting architectures.
>
David, I don't know what to do until there's some clarity on the
numa/sched changes. Andrea has a new autonuma patchset, Peter's code
is in -next and I don't know if it's planned for 3.7 merging. And I
suspect (hope) that it won't be merged if that is indeed planned.
Two days I asked what's going on and didn't get told. I put the entire
MM merge on hold yesterday and went off to do other things. At present
I plan to restage MM against mainline and send it all along to Linus on
Monday. If that happens and if you wish that the sparc changes be
merged for 3.7, I suggest that you rebase and retest on Tuesday and ask
Linus to pull it, with my ack.
Sorry.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
aarcange@redhat.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] THP support for Sparc64
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:36:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121005143644.abb14c2b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121004.154624.923241475790311926.davem@davemloft.net>
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 15:46:24 -0400 (EDT)
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> Changes since V1:
>
> 1) Respun against mmotm
>
> 2) Bug fix for pgtable allocation, need real locking instead of
> just preemption disabling.
>
> Andrew, you can probably take patch #5 in this series and combine
> it into:
>
> mm-thp-fix-the-update_mmu_cache-last-argument-passing-in-mm-huge_memoryc.patch
>
> in your batch. And finally add a NOP implementation for S390
> and any other huge page supporting architectures.
>
David, I don't know what to do until there's some clarity on the
numa/sched changes. Andrea has a new autonuma patchset, Peter's code
is in -next and I don't know if it's planned for 3.7 merging. And I
suspect (hope) that it won't be merged if that is indeed planned.
Two days I asked what's going on and didn't get told. I put the entire
MM merge on hold yesterday and went off to do other things. At present
I plan to restage MM against mainline and send it all along to Linus on
Monday. If that happens and if you wish that the sparc changes be
merged for 3.7, I suggest that you rebase and retest on Tuesday and ask
Linus to pull it, with my ack.
Sorry.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-05 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-04 19:46 [PATCH v2 0/8] THP support for Sparc64 David Miller
2012-10-04 19:46 ` David Miller
2012-10-04 19:46 ` David Miller
2012-10-05 21:36 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-10-05 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-05 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-05 21:45 ` David Miller
2012-10-05 21:45 ` David Miller
2012-10-05 21:45 ` David Miller
2012-10-05 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-05 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-05 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121005143644.abb14c2b.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.