* F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC broken in 3.7.0 [not found] ` <20121008215325.GC15039@rhmail.home.annexia.org> @ 2012-10-08 22:05 ` Richard W.M. Jones 2012-10-09 14:07 ` Cong Wang 2012-10-08 22:21 ` [regression] F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC breakage fix Al Viro 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Richard W.M. Jones @ 2012-10-08 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jim Meyering, eblake; +Cc: Al Viro, LKML [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1432 bytes --] Let's move this to LKML ... On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:53:25PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:50:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > [.. discussion on gnulib test-cloexec test snipped ..] > > I'm suspicious this is a kernel bug: > > > > creat("test-cloexec.tmp", 0600) = 3 > > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0 > > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0 > > fcntl(3, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 > > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0x1 (flags FD_CLOEXEC) > > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0x1 (flags FD_CLOEXEC) > > fcntl(3, F_SETFD, 0) = 0 > > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0 > > fcntl(3, F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC, 0) = 4 > > fcntl(4, F_GETFD) = 0 > > write(2, "test-cloexec.c:97: assertion failed\n", 36) = 36 > > > > It seems to me from the description in the man page that > > F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC ought to be setting the FD_CLOEXEC flag on file > > descriptor 4, so either it's not or else F_GETFD isn't reading the > > flag for some reason. > > Al Viro (CC'd) made some changes in this area recently .. Attached is a self-contained test program that demonstrates the bug. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org [-- Attachment #2: cloexec.c --] [-- Type: text/plain, Size: 578 bytes --] /* Test if F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC works right. * by Richard W.M. Jones. */ #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <assert.h> int main () { char *file = "/tmp/cloexec.tmp"; int fd = creat (file, 0600); int fd2; int flags; assert (fd >= 0); fd2 = fcntl (fd, F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC, 0); assert (fd2 >= 0); flags = fcntl (fd2, F_GETFD); assert (flags >= 0); if ((flags & FD_CLOEXEC) == 0) { fprintf (stderr, "F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC failed to set FD_CLOEXEC flag!\n"); exit (EXIT_FAILURE); } exit (EXIT_SUCCESS); } ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC broken in 3.7.0 2012-10-08 22:05 ` F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC broken in 3.7.0 Richard W.M. Jones @ 2012-10-09 14:07 ` Cong Wang 2012-10-09 14:10 ` Richard W.M. Jones 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Cong Wang @ 2012-10-09 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Richard W.M. Jones; +Cc: Jim Meyering, eblake, Al Viro, LKML On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > Let's move this to LKML ... > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:53:25PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:50:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> [.. discussion on gnulib test-cloexec test snipped ..] >> > I'm suspicious this is a kernel bug: >> > >> > creat("test-cloexec.tmp", 0600) = 3 >> > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0 >> > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0 >> > fcntl(3, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 >> > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0x1 (flags FD_CLOEXEC) >> > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0x1 (flags FD_CLOEXEC) >> > fcntl(3, F_SETFD, 0) = 0 >> > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0 >> > fcntl(3, F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC, 0) = 4 >> > fcntl(4, F_GETFD) = 0 >> > write(2, "test-cloexec.c:97: assertion failed\n", 36) = 36 >> > >> > It seems to me from the description in the man page that >> > F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC ought to be setting the FD_CLOEXEC flag on file >> > descriptor 4, so either it's not or else F_GETFD isn't reading the >> > flag for some reason. >> >> Al Viro (CC'd) made some changes in this area recently .. > > Attached is a self-contained test program that demonstrates the bug. > Seems we passed a wrong flag to f_dupfd()... Does the following patch help? diff --git a/fs/fcntl.c b/fs/fcntl.c index 8f70429..71a600a 100644 --- a/fs/fcntl.c +++ b/fs/fcntl.c @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static long do_fcntl(int fd, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg, err = f_dupfd(arg, filp, 0); break; case F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC: - err = f_dupfd(arg, filp, FD_CLOEXEC); + err = f_dupfd(arg, filp, O_CLOEXEC); break; case F_GETFD: err = get_close_on_exec(fd) ? FD_CLOEXEC : 0; ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC broken in 3.7.0 2012-10-09 14:07 ` Cong Wang @ 2012-10-09 14:10 ` Richard W.M. Jones 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Richard W.M. Jones @ 2012-10-09 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Cong Wang; +Cc: Jim Meyering, eblake, Al Viro, LKML On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:07:22PM +0800, Cong Wang wrote: > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > Let's move this to LKML ... > > > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:53:25PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:50:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> [.. discussion on gnulib test-cloexec test snipped ..] > >> > I'm suspicious this is a kernel bug: > >> > > >> > creat("test-cloexec.tmp", 0600) = 3 > >> > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0 > >> > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0 > >> > fcntl(3, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 > >> > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0x1 (flags FD_CLOEXEC) > >> > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0x1 (flags FD_CLOEXEC) > >> > fcntl(3, F_SETFD, 0) = 0 > >> > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0 > >> > fcntl(3, F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC, 0) = 4 > >> > fcntl(4, F_GETFD) = 0 > >> > write(2, "test-cloexec.c:97: assertion failed\n", 36) = 36 > >> > > >> > It seems to me from the description in the man page that > >> > F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC ought to be setting the FD_CLOEXEC flag on file > >> > descriptor 4, so either it's not or else F_GETFD isn't reading the > >> > flag for some reason. > >> > >> Al Viro (CC'd) made some changes in this area recently .. > > > > Attached is a self-contained test program that demonstrates the bug. > > > > Seems we passed a wrong flag to f_dupfd()... > Does the following patch help? > > diff --git a/fs/fcntl.c b/fs/fcntl.c > index 8f70429..71a600a 100644 > --- a/fs/fcntl.c > +++ b/fs/fcntl.c > @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static long do_fcntl(int fd, unsigned int cmd, > unsigned long arg, > err = f_dupfd(arg, filp, 0); > break; > case F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC: > - err = f_dupfd(arg, filp, FD_CLOEXEC); > + err = f_dupfd(arg, filp, O_CLOEXEC); > break; > case F_GETFD: > err = get_close_on_exec(fd) ? FD_CLOEXEC : 0; Yes .. the same patch has already been sent upstream. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [regression] F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC breakage fix [not found] ` <20121008215325.GC15039@rhmail.home.annexia.org> 2012-10-08 22:05 ` F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC broken in 3.7.0 Richard W.M. Jones @ 2012-10-08 22:21 ` Al Viro 2012-10-09 8:53 ` Richard W.M. Jones 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Al Viro @ 2012-10-08 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Jim Meyering, bug-gnulib, Richard W.M. Jones, linux-fsdevel On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:53:25PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:50:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > [.. discussion on gnulib test-cloexec test snipped ..] > > I'm suspicious this is a kernel bug: > > > > creat("test-cloexec.tmp", 0600) = 3 > > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0 > > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0 > > fcntl(3, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 > > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0x1 (flags FD_CLOEXEC) > > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0x1 (flags FD_CLOEXEC) > > fcntl(3, F_SETFD, 0) = 0 > > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0 > > fcntl(3, F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC, 0) = 4 > > fcntl(4, F_GETFD) = 0 > > write(2, "test-cloexec.c:97: assertion failed\n", 36) = 36 > > > > It seems to me from the description in the man page that > > F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC ought to be setting the FD_CLOEXEC flag on file > > descriptor 4, so either it's not or else F_GETFD isn't reading the > > flag for some reason. Interesting... Oh, crap. OK, that's easily fixed: in fs/fcntl.c err = f_dupfd(arg, filp, FD_CLOEXEC); should get s/FD_/O_/. Linus, could you apply the following? Fix a braino in F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC; f_dupfd() expects flags for alloc_fd()/get_unused_fd()/etc. and there clone-on-exec if O_CLOEXEC, not FD_CLOEXEC. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> --- diff --git a/fs/fcntl.c b/fs/fcntl.c index 8f70429..71a600a 100644 --- a/fs/fcntl.c +++ b/fs/fcntl.c @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static long do_fcntl(int fd, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg, err = f_dupfd(arg, filp, 0); break; case F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC: - err = f_dupfd(arg, filp, FD_CLOEXEC); + err = f_dupfd(arg, filp, O_CLOEXEC); break; case F_GETFD: err = get_close_on_exec(fd) ? FD_CLOEXEC : 0; ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [regression] F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC breakage fix 2012-10-08 22:21 ` [regression] F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC breakage fix Al Viro @ 2012-10-09 8:53 ` Richard W.M. Jones 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Richard W.M. Jones @ 2012-10-09 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Al Viro; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, Jim Meyering, bug-gnulib, linux-fsdevel On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 11:21:58PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:53:25PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:50:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > [.. discussion on gnulib test-cloexec test snipped ..] > > > I'm suspicious this is a kernel bug: > > > > > > creat("test-cloexec.tmp", 0600) = 3 > > > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0 > > > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0 > > > fcntl(3, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 > > > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0x1 (flags FD_CLOEXEC) > > > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0x1 (flags FD_CLOEXEC) > > > fcntl(3, F_SETFD, 0) = 0 > > > fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0 > > > fcntl(3, F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC, 0) = 4 > > > fcntl(4, F_GETFD) = 0 > > > write(2, "test-cloexec.c:97: assertion failed\n", 36) = 36 > > > > > > It seems to me from the description in the man page that > > > F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC ought to be setting the FD_CLOEXEC flag on file > > > descriptor 4, so either it's not or else F_GETFD isn't reading the > > > flag for some reason. > > Interesting... Oh, crap. OK, that's easily fixed: in fs/fcntl.c > err = f_dupfd(arg, filp, FD_CLOEXEC); > should get s/FD_/O_/. Linus, could you apply the following? > > Fix a braino in F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC; f_dupfd() expects flags for > alloc_fd()/get_unused_fd()/etc. and there clone-on-exec if > O_CLOEXEC, not FD_CLOEXEC. > > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> I can confirm that this patch fixed the problem for me. Tested-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> > --- > diff --git a/fs/fcntl.c b/fs/fcntl.c > index 8f70429..71a600a 100644 > --- a/fs/fcntl.c > +++ b/fs/fcntl.c > @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static long do_fcntl(int fd, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg, > err = f_dupfd(arg, filp, 0); > break; > case F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC: > - err = f_dupfd(arg, filp, FD_CLOEXEC); > + err = f_dupfd(arg, filp, O_CLOEXEC); > break; > case F_GETFD: > err = get_close_on_exec(fd) ? FD_CLOEXEC : 0; Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-09 14:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20121008171517.GA15039@rhmail.home.annexia.org>
[not found] ` <20121008172103.GB15039@rhmail.home.annexia.org>
[not found] ` <87a9vwrgtl.fsf@rho.meyering.net>
[not found] ` <20121008215030.GI24071@rhmail.home.annexia.org>
[not found] ` <20121008215325.GC15039@rhmail.home.annexia.org>
2012-10-08 22:05 ` F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC broken in 3.7.0 Richard W.M. Jones
2012-10-09 14:07 ` Cong Wang
2012-10-09 14:10 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2012-10-08 22:21 ` [regression] F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC breakage fix Al Viro
2012-10-09 8:53 ` Richard W.M. Jones
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.