Re: NILFS: corrupt root inode after Turbo Mode?

[Piotr Szymaniak <szarpaj-TbOm9Ca2r9GrDJvtcaxF/A@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1537 bytes --]

On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:49:15PM +0100, Christian Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 12:52:39PM +0200, Piotr Szymaniak wrote:
> > It's an ???allowed??? overcloking. I have another SD Card with Raspbian (and
> > without nilfs2) that works fine with Turbo Mode. At least it seems to
> > work fine. The second card was in Turbo Mode (@900MHz) for a few days
> > and was working. Yesterday i made it @1000MHz and it didn't boot.
> 
> It's allowed in that it no longer invalidates your warranty, but I don't think
> there is any guarantee it will work.
> 
> Overclocking also puts more load on the PSU, so there is potentially less
> power available for the SD Card to work with. Perhaps a write failed due
> to power issues in Turbo mode? What is your PSU rating? 0.7A is the
> recommended amount the PSU should be able to supply.

It seems to work fine with Raspbian, so I dubt it's an PSU issue (I've
tested Raspbian @1000MHz in the first place). Afair the PSU is 1 or 1,1A,
so that should not be a problem.


> As an aside, I have also been thinking of using NILFS root, but struggled to
> get the default kernel up and running with an initrd (to load the nilfs2
> module). Did you use a built in nilfs2 driver?

Yes, I'm using custom build kernel with build in nilfs2 support (and a
lot of stuff cut down since I won't use it (and even if, I can compile
them back, right?)).


Piotr Szymaniak.
-- 
Nie mam problemu z piciem.  Bez  problemu  pije,  upijam sie i walam po
podlodze.
  -- R. Williams

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]