All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	nscott@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_quota: XFS_XFLAG_PROJINHERIT is only for dirs
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 10:34:31 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121013233431.GQ2739@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121013155205.GA11037@infradead.org>

On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:52:05AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:19:55AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > xfs_quota has long set XFS_XFLAG_PROJINHERIT on all files,
> > and tested for presence on all files.  However, Dave's semi-recent
> > xfs_repair update is now flagging this as an error:
> 
> I think we should rever that part of the repair patch.  While there
> really is not point to have XFS_XFLAG_PROJINHERIT set on non-directory
> files we have been setting it for year, so repair should cope with that.

Repair does cope with it - it issues a warning and clears the flag.
It doesn't stop, it simply fixes an inconsistency in the inode flags.

The main problem, by the sounds of it, is that repair issues a
warning that it is clearing the flags that should not be set. This
is what makes check_scratch_fs fail because of the extra output.
That's easy to fix - filter the line from the repair output and be
done with it. In future (with Eric's patch) this situation won't
occur.

So, really, I think the only thing that needs modifying to handle
this situation is a filter update to xfstests...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-13 23:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-12 16:19 [PATCH] xfs_quota: XFS_XFLAG_PROJINHERIT is only for dirs Eric Sandeen
2012-10-13 15:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-13 21:22   ` Eric Sandeen
2012-10-13 23:34   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2012-10-14  0:05     ` Eric Sandeen
2012-10-14  0:14       ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-16 20:17         ` Ben Myers
2012-10-16 20:34           ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-17 15:54           ` Eric Sandeen
2012-10-23 12:34         ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121013233431.GQ2739@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=nscott@redhat.com \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.