From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, Anton Blanchard <anton@au1.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eranian@google.com,
acme@redhat.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org,
mpjohn@us.ibm.com, mingo@kernel.org, asharma@fb.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] perf: Add a few generic stalled-cycles events
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:08:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121016100809.GS8285@erda.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121015155534.GR8285@erda.amd.com>
Sukadev,
On 15.10.12 17:55:34, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 11.10.12 18:28:39, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> > + { .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE, .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_FIXED_POINT },
> > + { .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE, .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_LOAD_STORE },
> > + { .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE, .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_INSTRUCTION_FETCH },
> > + { .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE, .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_BRANCH },
>
> Instead of adding new hardware event types I would prefer to use raw
> events in conjunction with sysfs, see e.g. the intel-uncore
> implementation. Something like:
>
> $ find /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu/events/
> ...
> /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu/events/stalled-cycles-fixed-point
> /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu/events/stalled-cycles-load-store
> /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu/events/stalled-cycles-instruction-fetch
> /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu/events/stalled-cycles-branch
> ...
> $ cat /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu/events/stalled-cycles-fixed-point
> event=0xff,umask=0x00
>
> Perf tool works then out-of-the-box with:
>
> $ perf record -e cpu/stalled-cycles-fixed-point/ ...
I refer here to arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c (should
be in v3.7-rc1 or tip:perf/core). See the INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC()
macro and 'if (type->event_descs) ...' in uncore_type_init(). The code
should be reworked to be non-architectural.
PMU registration is implemented for a longer time already for all
architectures and pmu types:
/sys/bus/event_source/devices/*
But
/sys/bus/event_source/devices/*/events/
exists only for a small number of pmus. Perf tool support of this was
implemented with:
a6146d5 perf/tool: Add PMU event alias support
-Robert
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: <acme@redhat.com>, <mingo@kernel.org>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<eranian@google.com>, <asharma@fb.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@au1.ibm.com>, <paulus@samba.org>,
<mpjohn@us.ibm.com>, <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] perf: Add a few generic stalled-cycles events
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:08:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121016100809.GS8285@erda.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121015155534.GR8285@erda.amd.com>
Sukadev,
On 15.10.12 17:55:34, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 11.10.12 18:28:39, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> > + { .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE, .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_FIXED_POINT },
> > + { .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE, .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_LOAD_STORE },
> > + { .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE, .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_INSTRUCTION_FETCH },
> > + { .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE, .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_BRANCH },
>
> Instead of adding new hardware event types I would prefer to use raw
> events in conjunction with sysfs, see e.g. the intel-uncore
> implementation. Something like:
>
> $ find /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu/events/
> ...
> /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu/events/stalled-cycles-fixed-point
> /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu/events/stalled-cycles-load-store
> /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu/events/stalled-cycles-instruction-fetch
> /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu/events/stalled-cycles-branch
> ...
> $ cat /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu/events/stalled-cycles-fixed-point
> event=0xff,umask=0x00
>
> Perf tool works then out-of-the-box with:
>
> $ perf record -e cpu/stalled-cycles-fixed-point/ ...
I refer here to arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c (should
be in v3.7-rc1 or tip:perf/core). See the INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC()
macro and 'if (type->event_descs) ...' in uncore_type_init(). The code
should be reworked to be non-architectural.
PMU registration is implemented for a longer time already for all
architectures and pmu types:
/sys/bus/event_source/devices/*
But
/sys/bus/event_source/devices/*/events/
exists only for a small number of pmus. Perf tool support of this was
implemented with:
a6146d5 perf/tool: Add PMU event alias support
-Robert
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-16 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-12 1:28 [RFC][PATCH] perf: Add a few generic stalled-cycles events Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2012-10-12 1:28 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2012-10-15 5:26 ` Anshuman Khandual
2012-10-15 5:26 ` Anshuman Khandual
2012-10-15 15:55 ` Robert Richter
2012-10-15 15:55 ` Robert Richter
2012-10-15 17:23 ` Arun Sharma
2012-10-15 17:23 ` Arun Sharma
2012-10-16 5:28 ` Anshuman Khandual
2012-10-16 5:28 ` Anshuman Khandual
2012-10-16 10:08 ` Robert Richter [this message]
2012-10-16 10:08 ` Robert Richter
2012-10-16 12:21 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-10-16 12:21 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-10-19 17:05 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2012-10-19 17:05 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2012-10-16 18:31 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2012-10-16 18:31 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2012-10-24 12:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-24 12:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-31 6:40 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2012-10-31 6:40 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2012-10-31 7:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-31 7:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121016100809.GS8285@erda.amd.com \
--to=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=anton@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=asharma@fb.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpjohn@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.