From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
aarcange@redhat.com, Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/2] numa, mm: Rename the PROT_NONE fault handling functions
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:43:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121021134341.GA23820@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121021132921.GA23425@gmail.com>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Michel indicated that he does not use PROT_NONE for his
> > working set estimation code, but instead checks the accessed
> > bits in the page tables.
>
> The pte_young() WSS method has a couple of fundamental
> limitations:
>
> - it doesn't work with shared memory very well, the pte is per
> mapping, not per page. The PROT_NONE method instruments the
> physical page in essence.
>
> - it does not tell us which task touched the pte, in a
> multi-threaded program
>
> So like Peter I'd too expect these new WSS methods to eventually
> be picked up for any serious WSS work.
Nevertheless lets wait and see until it actually happens - and
meanwhile the prot_none namings are confusing.
So I've applied your patch as-is, with two more (new) usage
sites converted as well. Will push it out after a bit of
testing.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-21 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-18 21:18 [PATCH 0/2] minor NUMA cleanups & documentation Rik van Riel
2012-10-18 21:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] add credits for NUMA placement Rik van Riel
2012-10-19 11:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-19 12:02 ` [tip:numa/core] numa: Add " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2012-10-28 17:11 ` [tip:numa/core] sched, numa, mm: " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2012-11-13 15:31 ` tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2012-11-13 17:23 ` tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2012-11-19 19:46 ` tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2012-10-18 21:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] rename NUMA fault handling functions Rik van Riel
2012-10-19 11:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-19 14:07 ` Rik van Riel
2012-10-19 20:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-10-21 12:50 ` [PATCH 4/2] numa, mm: Rename the PROT_NONE " Ingo Molnar
2012-10-21 13:22 ` Rik van Riel
2012-10-21 13:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-10-21 13:43 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-10-20 10:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] rename NUMA " Michel Lespinasse
2012-10-21 15:20 ` [tip:numa/core] numa, mm: Rename the PROT_NONE fault handling functions to *_numa() tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2012-10-23 11:00 ` tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2012-10-21 12:43 ` [PATCH 3/2] sched, numa, mm: Implement constant rate working set sampling Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121021134341.GA23820@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.