From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"mhocko@suse.cz" <mhocko@suse.cz>,
"kirill@shutemov.name" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
"aarcange@redhat.com" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"cmetcalf@tilera.com" <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: thp: Set the accessed flag for old pages on access fault.
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:18:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121022111843.4406850d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121022103503.GA26619@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:35:03 +0100
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 07:49:55PM +0100, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 10:10:16 +0100
> > Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:05:02PM +0100, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:54:02 +0100
> > > > Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On x86 memory accesses to pages without the ACCESSED flag set result in the
> > > > > ACCESSED flag being set automatically. With the ARM architecture a page access
> > > > > fault is raised instead (and it will continue to be raised until the ACCESSED
> > > > > flag is set for the appropriate PTE/PMD).
> > > > >
> > > > > For normal memory pages, handle_pte_fault will call pte_mkyoung (effectively
> > > > > setting the ACCESSED flag). For transparent huge pages, pmd_mkyoung will only
> > > > > be called for a write fault.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch ensures that faults on transparent hugepages which do not result
> > > > > in a CoW update the access flags for the faulting pmd.
> > > >
> > > > Confused. Where is the arm implementation of update_mmu_cache_pmd()?
> > >
> > > Right at the end of this patch, which was posted to the ARM list yesterday:
> > >
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-October/126387.html
> >
> > I received and then merged a patch which won't compile!
>
> Eek, that certainly wasn't intentional and it's compiling fine for me on
> -rc1 and -rc2 for both ARM (no THP) and x86 (with and without THP).
>
> Please can you send the build failure?
>
> > Ho hum. I'll drop
> > mm-thp-set-the-accessed-flag-for-old-pages-on-access-fault.patch and
> > shall assume that you'll sort things out at the appropriate time.
>
> Happy to sort it out once I work out what's going wrong!
The patch "ARM: mm: Transparent huge page support for LPAE systems" is
not present in linux-next, so this patch ("mm: thp: Set the accessed
flag for old pages on access fault") will not compile?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"mhocko@suse.cz" <mhocko@suse.cz>,
"kirill@shutemov.name" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
"aarcange@redhat.com" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"cmetcalf@tilera.com" <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: thp: Set the accessed flag for old pages on access fault.
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:18:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121022111843.4406850d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121022103503.GA26619@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:35:03 +0100
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 07:49:55PM +0100, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 10:10:16 +0100
> > Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:05:02PM +0100, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:54:02 +0100
> > > > Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On x86 memory accesses to pages without the ACCESSED flag set result in the
> > > > > ACCESSED flag being set automatically. With the ARM architecture a page access
> > > > > fault is raised instead (and it will continue to be raised until the ACCESSED
> > > > > flag is set for the appropriate PTE/PMD).
> > > > >
> > > > > For normal memory pages, handle_pte_fault will call pte_mkyoung (effectively
> > > > > setting the ACCESSED flag). For transparent huge pages, pmd_mkyoung will only
> > > > > be called for a write fault.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch ensures that faults on transparent hugepages which do not result
> > > > > in a CoW update the access flags for the faulting pmd.
> > > >
> > > > Confused. Where is the arm implementation of update_mmu_cache_pmd()?
> > >
> > > Right at the end of this patch, which was posted to the ARM list yesterday:
> > >
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-October/126387.html
> >
> > I received and then merged a patch which won't compile!
>
> Eek, that certainly wasn't intentional and it's compiling fine for me on
> -rc1 and -rc2 for both ARM (no THP) and x86 (with and without THP).
>
> Please can you send the build failure?
>
> > Ho hum. I'll drop
> > mm-thp-set-the-accessed-flag-for-old-pages-on-access-fault.patch and
> > shall assume that you'll sort things out at the appropriate time.
>
> Happy to sort it out once I work out what's going wrong!
The patch "ARM: mm: Transparent huge page support for LPAE systems" is
not present in linux-next, so this patch ("mm: thp: Set the accessed
flag for old pages on access fault") will not compile?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-22 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-02 16:59 [PATCH v2] mm: thp: Set the accessed flag for old pages on access fault Will Deacon
2012-10-02 16:59 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-02 17:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-10-02 17:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-10-02 22:01 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-02 22:01 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-03 9:09 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-03 9:09 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-17 13:01 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-17 13:01 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-17 13:01 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-17 13:01 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-17 15:26 ` David Miller
2012-10-17 15:26 ` David Miller
2012-10-17 15:54 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-17 15:54 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-17 15:54 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-17 15:54 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-18 22:05 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-18 22:05 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-19 9:10 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-19 9:10 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-19 18:49 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-19 18:49 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-22 10:35 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-22 10:35 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-22 18:18 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-10-22 18:18 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-23 10:11 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-23 10:11 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-23 21:50 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-23 21:50 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-24 9:35 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-24 9:35 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-04 22:13 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2012-10-04 22:13 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121022111843.4406850d.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Steve.Capper@arm.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.