From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add some drop_caches documentation and info messsge
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:54:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121024125439.c17a510e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121024062938.GA6119@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:29:45 +0200
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> wrote:
> > >
> > > + printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s (%d): dropped kernel caches: %d\n",
> > > + current->comm, task_pid_nr(current), sysctl_drop_caches);
> >
> > urgh. Are we really sure we want to do this? The system operators who
> > are actually using this thing will hate us :(
>
> I have no problems with lowering the priority (how do you see
> KERN_INFO?) but shouldn't this message kick them that they are doing
> something wrong? Or if somebody uses that for "benchmarking" to have a
> clean table before start is this really that invasive?
hmpf. This patch worries me. If there are people out there who are
regularly using drop_caches because the VM sucks, it seems pretty
obnoxious of us to go dumping stuff into their syslog. What are they
supposed to do? Stop using drop_caches? But that would unfix the
problem which they fixed with drop_caches in the first case.
And they might not even have control over the code - they need to go
back to their supplier and say "please send me a new version", along
with all the additional costs and risks involed in an update.
> > More friendly alternatives might be:
> >
> > - Taint the kernel. But that will only become apparent with an oops
> > trace or similar.
> >
> > - Add a drop_caches counter and make that available in /proc/vmstat,
> > show_mem() output and perhaps other places.
>
> We would loose timing and originating process name in both cases which
> can be really helpful while debugging. It is fair to say that we could
> deduce the timing if we are collecting /proc/meminfo or /proc/vmstat
> already and we do collect them often but this is not the case all of the
> time and sometimes it is important to know _who_ is doing all this.
But how important is all that? The main piece of information the
kernel developer wants is "this guy is using drop_caches a lot". All
the other info is peripheral and can be gathered by other means if so
desired.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add some drop_caches documentation and info messsge
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:54:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121024125439.c17a510e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121024062938.GA6119@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:29:45 +0200
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> wrote:
> > >
> > > + printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s (%d): dropped kernel caches: %d\n",
> > > + current->comm, task_pid_nr(current), sysctl_drop_caches);
> >
> > urgh. Are we really sure we want to do this? The system operators who
> > are actually using this thing will hate us :(
>
> I have no problems with lowering the priority (how do you see
> KERN_INFO?) but shouldn't this message kick them that they are doing
> something wrong? Or if somebody uses that for "benchmarking" to have a
> clean table before start is this really that invasive?
hmpf. This patch worries me. If there are people out there who are
regularly using drop_caches because the VM sucks, it seems pretty
obnoxious of us to go dumping stuff into their syslog. What are they
supposed to do? Stop using drop_caches? But that would unfix the
problem which they fixed with drop_caches in the first case.
And they might not even have control over the code - they need to go
back to their supplier and say "please send me a new version", along
with all the additional costs and risks involed in an update.
> > More friendly alternatives might be:
> >
> > - Taint the kernel. But that will only become apparent with an oops
> > trace or similar.
> >
> > - Add a drop_caches counter and make that available in /proc/vmstat,
> > show_mem() output and perhaps other places.
>
> We would loose timing and originating process name in both cases which
> can be really helpful while debugging. It is fair to say that we could
> deduce the timing if we are collecting /proc/meminfo or /proc/vmstat
> already and we do collect them often but this is not the case all of the
> time and sometimes it is important to know _who_ is doing all this.
But how important is all that? The main piece of information the
kernel developer wants is "this guy is using drop_caches a lot". All
the other info is peripheral and can be gathered by other means if so
desired.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-24 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-12 12:57 [PATCH] add some drop_caches documentation and info messsge Michal Hocko
2012-10-12 12:57 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-12 18:54 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-12 18:54 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-15 9:04 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-15 9:04 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-15 14:05 ` Dave Hansen
2012-10-15 14:05 ` Dave Hansen
2012-10-23 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-23 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-24 6:29 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-24 6:29 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-24 19:54 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-10-24 19:54 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-24 20:28 ` Dave Hansen
2012-10-24 20:28 ` Dave Hansen
2012-10-24 20:48 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-24 20:48 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-24 21:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-24 21:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-24 21:13 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-24 21:13 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-24 22:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-24 22:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-25 1:17 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-25 1:17 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-25 20:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-25 20:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-29 8:59 ` Jiri Kosina
2012-10-29 8:59 ` Jiri Kosina
2012-10-29 9:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-29 9:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-29 10:01 ` Jiri Kosina
2012-10-29 10:01 ` Jiri Kosina
2012-10-29 10:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-29 10:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-31 17:31 ` Pavel Machek
2012-10-31 17:31 ` Pavel Machek
2012-10-31 17:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-31 17:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-24 22:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-24 22:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-25 14:21 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-25 14:21 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-24 21:18 ` Dave Hansen
2012-10-24 21:18 ` Dave Hansen
2012-10-24 22:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-24 22:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-24 22:57 ` Dave Hansen
2012-10-24 22:57 ` Dave Hansen
2012-10-25 0:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-25 0:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-25 9:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-25 9:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-25 11:57 ` Dave Hansen
2012-10-25 11:57 ` Dave Hansen
2012-10-25 14:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-25 14:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-25 14:25 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-25 14:25 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-26 7:45 ` Mika Boström
2012-10-26 7:45 ` Mika Boström
2012-11-01 20:26 ` Pavel Machek
2012-11-01 20:26 ` Pavel Machek
2012-10-25 14:09 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-25 14:09 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121024125439.c17a510e.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.