From: nbowler@elliptictech.com (Nick Bowler)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] zynq: move static peripheral mappings
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:19:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121024201928.GA31069@elliptictech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121023234219.GM20593@beefymiracle.amer.corp.natinst.com>
On 2012-10-23 18:42 -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 04:27:03PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
> > Just FYI, I sent a patch to fix the same bug a while back
> >
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1156361/
> >
> > together with other patches to fix early printk on the ZC702 serial
> > console. Admittedly, I dropped the ball on these as other issues
> > came up so I was away from the Zynq for a while.
> >
> > However, I'm now getting back on the Zynq and have a bunch of patches to
> > make it all work on the ZC702 board. I've respun the ZC702 early boot
> > fixes against newer git but they're obviously going to conflict with
> > this series. Should I resend them anyway?
>
> If you have other fixes for the zc702, that'd be great. Most of my
> testing has been in a qemu model; I haven't had a chance to try getting
> the zc702 booting yet.
>
> The first stumbling block is that it looks like the secondary uart is
> the primary uart on the zc702.
Yes, that is indeed the case, and was what I tried to address with my
earlier patches.
> > I also have a DT binding for the TTC driver, I can send that.
>
> That'd be great!
OK, I will respin and test this stuff on top of your v4 series and send
them out.
Cheers,
--
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>
To: Josh Cartwright <josh.cartwright@ni.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
arm@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Linn <john.linn@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] zynq: move static peripheral mappings
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:19:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121024201928.GA31069@elliptictech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121023234219.GM20593@beefymiracle.amer.corp.natinst.com>
On 2012-10-23 18:42 -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 04:27:03PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
> > Just FYI, I sent a patch to fix the same bug a while back
> >
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1156361/
> >
> > together with other patches to fix early printk on the ZC702 serial
> > console. Admittedly, I dropped the ball on these as other issues
> > came up so I was away from the Zynq for a while.
> >
> > However, I'm now getting back on the Zynq and have a bunch of patches to
> > make it all work on the ZC702 board. I've respun the ZC702 early boot
> > fixes against newer git but they're obviously going to conflict with
> > this series. Should I resend them anyway?
>
> If you have other fixes for the zc702, that'd be great. Most of my
> testing has been in a qemu model; I haven't had a chance to try getting
> the zc702 booting yet.
>
> The first stumbling block is that it looks like the secondary uart is
> the primary uart on the zc702.
Yes, that is indeed the case, and was what I tried to address with my
earlier patches.
> > I also have a DT binding for the TTC driver, I can send that.
>
> That'd be great!
OK, I will respin and test this stuff on top of your v4 series and send
them out.
Cheers,
--
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-24 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-22 21:10 [PATCH v2 0/4] zynq subarch cleanups Josh Cartwright
2012-10-22 21:10 ` Josh Cartwright
2012-10-22 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ARM: annotate VMALLOC_END definition with _AC Josh Cartwright
2012-10-22 21:11 ` Josh Cartwright
2012-10-22 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] zynq: move static peripheral mappings Josh Cartwright
2012-10-22 21:12 ` Josh Cartwright
2012-10-23 14:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-23 14:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-23 16:26 ` Josh Cartwright
2012-10-23 16:26 ` Josh Cartwright
2012-10-23 17:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-23 17:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-23 20:27 ` Nick Bowler
2012-10-23 20:27 ` Nick Bowler
2012-10-23 23:42 ` Josh Cartwright
2012-10-23 23:42 ` Josh Cartwright
2012-10-24 20:19 ` Nick Bowler [this message]
2012-10-24 20:19 ` Nick Bowler
2012-10-23 20:09 ` Rob Herring
2012-10-23 20:09 ` Rob Herring
2012-10-23 20:53 ` Josh Cartwright
2012-10-23 20:53 ` Josh Cartwright
2012-10-23 21:17 ` Nick Bowler
2012-10-23 21:17 ` Nick Bowler
2012-10-23 21:24 ` Josh Cartwright
2012-10-23 21:24 ` Josh Cartwright
2012-10-22 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] zynq: use GIC device tree bindings Josh Cartwright
2012-10-22 21:12 ` Josh Cartwright
2012-10-22 21:13 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] zynq: remove use of CLKDEV_LOOKUP Josh Cartwright
2012-10-22 21:13 ` Josh Cartwright
2012-10-23 14:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] zynq subarch cleanups Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-23 14:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-23 20:50 ` Rob Herring
2012-10-23 20:50 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121024201928.GA31069@elliptictech.com \
--to=nbowler@elliptictech.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.