From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blkcg: fix "scheduling while atomic" in blk_queue_bypass_start
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:21:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121030132151.GA2290@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <508F3AAB.6060204@ce.jp.nec.com>
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:25:47AM +0900, Jun'ichi Nomura wrote:
[..]
> This patch moves blk_queue_bypass_start() before radix_tree_preload()
> to avoid the sleeping call while preemption is disabled.
>
> BUG: scheduling while atomic: multipath/2460/0x00000002
> 1 lock held by multipath/2460:
> #0: (&md->type_lock){......}, at: [<ffffffffa019fb05>] dm_lock_md_type+0x17/0x19 [dm_mod]
> Modules linked in: ...
> Pid: 2460, comm: multipath Tainted: G W 3.7.0-rc2 #1
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff810723ae>] __schedule_bug+0x6a/0x78
> [<ffffffff81428ba2>] __schedule+0xb4/0x5e0
> [<ffffffff814291e6>] schedule+0x64/0x66
> [<ffffffff8142773a>] schedule_timeout+0x39/0xf8
> [<ffffffff8108ad5f>] ? put_lock_stats+0xe/0x29
> [<ffffffff8108ae30>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0xb6/0xbb
> [<ffffffff814289e3>] wait_for_common+0x9d/0xee
> [<ffffffff8107526c>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x206/0x206
> [<ffffffff810c0eb8>] ? kfree_call_rcu+0x1c/0x1c
> [<ffffffff81428aec>] wait_for_completion+0x1d/0x1f
> [<ffffffff810611f9>] wait_rcu_gp+0x5d/0x7a
> [<ffffffff81061216>] ? wait_rcu_gp+0x7a/0x7a
> [<ffffffff8106fb18>] ? complete+0x21/0x53
> [<ffffffff810c0556>] synchronize_rcu+0x1e/0x20
> [<ffffffff811dd903>] blk_queue_bypass_start+0x5d/0x62
> [<ffffffff811ee109>] blkcg_activate_policy+0x73/0x270
> [<ffffffff81130521>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace+0xc7/0x108
> [<ffffffff811f04b3>] cfq_init_queue+0x80/0x28e
> [<ffffffffa01a1600>] ? dm_blk_ioctl+0xa7/0xa7 [dm_mod]
> [<ffffffff811d8c41>] elevator_init+0xe1/0x115
> [<ffffffff811e229f>] ? blk_queue_make_request+0x54/0x59
> [<ffffffff811dd743>] blk_init_allocated_queue+0x8c/0x9e
> [<ffffffffa019ffcd>] dm_setup_md_queue+0x36/0xaa [dm_mod]
> [<ffffffffa01a60e6>] table_load+0x1bd/0x2c8 [dm_mod]
> [<ffffffffa01a7026>] ctl_ioctl+0x1d6/0x236 [dm_mod]
> [<ffffffffa01a5f29>] ? table_clear+0xaa/0xaa [dm_mod]
> [<ffffffffa01a7099>] dm_ctl_ioctl+0x13/0x17 [dm_mod]
> [<ffffffff811479fc>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x3fb/0x441
> [<ffffffff811b643c>] ? file_has_perm+0x8a/0x99
> [<ffffffff81147aa0>] sys_ioctl+0x5e/0x82
> [<ffffffff812010be>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
> [<ffffffff814310d9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
> Signed-off-by: Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
> ---
Thanks Junichi. This patch looks good to me.
Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Vivek
> block/blk-cgroup.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
> index d0b7703..954f4be 100644
> --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
> +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
> @@ -791,10 +791,10 @@ int blkcg_activate_policy(struct request_queue *q,
> if (!blkg)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - preloaded = !radix_tree_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
> -
> blk_queue_bypass_start(q);
>
> + preloaded = !radix_tree_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> /* make sure the root blkg exists and count the existing blkgs */
> spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-30 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-25 9:41 [PATCH 2/2] dm: stay in blk_queue_bypass until queue becomes initialized Jun'ichi Nomura
2012-10-26 1:42 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2012-10-26 20:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-10-29 10:15 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2012-10-29 16:38 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-10-29 16:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-29 17:13 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-10-30 2:25 ` [PATCH] blkcg: fix "scheduling while atomic" in blk_queue_bypass_start Jun'ichi Nomura
2012-10-30 13:21 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2013-01-08 7:31 ` [PATCH repost] " Jun'ichi Nomura
2013-01-09 15:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-01-09 15:55 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-26 4:53 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2013-02-26 4:53 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2012-10-29 16:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] dm: stay in blk_queue_bypass until queue becomes initialized Paul E. McKenney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-10-30 6:32 [PATCH] blkcg: fix "scheduling while atomic" in blk_queue_bypass_start Staci Page
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121030132151.GA2290@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.