From: nbowler@elliptictech.com (Nick Bowler)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: zynq: Allow UART1 to be used as DEBUG_LL console.
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 14:39:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121101183921.GA32744@elliptictech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <508FB9B1.5060404@monstr.eu>
On 2012-10-30 12:27 +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 10/29/2012 07:19 PM, Nick Bowler wrote:
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_ZYNQ_UART1)
> > +# define LL_UART_PADDR UART1_PHYS
> > +# define LL_UART_VADDR UART_VIRT
> > +#else
> > +# define LL_UART_PADDR UART0_PHYS
> > +# define LL_UART_VADDR UART_VIRT
> > +#endif
>
> Probably no reason to setup LL_UART_VADDR on two lines.
> It is enough to set it up once.
>
> MINOR: It is just my personal preference to use different coding style.
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_ZYNQ_UART1)
> # define LL_UART_PADDR UART1_PHYS
> #else
> # define LL_UART_PADDR UART0_PHYS
> #endif
>
> #define LL_UART_VADDR UART_VIRT
I have no strong feeling either way, so I will send v3 with these
changes.
Thanks,
--
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>
To: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, arm@kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, John Linn <john.linn@xilinx.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
Josh Cartwright <josh.cartwright@ni.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: zynq: Allow UART1 to be used as DEBUG_LL console.
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 14:39:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121101183921.GA32744@elliptictech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <508FB9B1.5060404@monstr.eu>
On 2012-10-30 12:27 +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 10/29/2012 07:19 PM, Nick Bowler wrote:
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_ZYNQ_UART1)
> > +# define LL_UART_PADDR UART1_PHYS
> > +# define LL_UART_VADDR UART_VIRT
> > +#else
> > +# define LL_UART_PADDR UART0_PHYS
> > +# define LL_UART_VADDR UART_VIRT
> > +#endif
>
> Probably no reason to setup LL_UART_VADDR on two lines.
> It is enough to set it up once.
>
> MINOR: It is just my personal preference to use different coding style.
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_ZYNQ_UART1)
> # define LL_UART_PADDR UART1_PHYS
> #else
> # define LL_UART_PADDR UART0_PHYS
> #endif
>
> #define LL_UART_VADDR UART_VIRT
I have no strong feeling either way, so I will send v3 with these
changes.
Thanks,
--
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-01 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-29 18:19 [PATCH v2] ARM: zynq: Allow UART1 to be used as DEBUG_LL console Nick Bowler
2012-10-29 18:19 ` Nick Bowler
2012-10-30 11:27 ` Michal Simek
2012-10-30 11:27 ` Michal Simek
2012-11-01 18:39 ` Nick Bowler [this message]
2012-11-01 18:39 ` Nick Bowler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121101183921.GA32744@elliptictech.com \
--to=nbowler@elliptictech.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.