All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@gmail.com>,
	mst@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] virtio: balloon: fix missing unlock on error in fill_balloon()
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:47:48 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121113124748.GA1636@optiplex.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121112153453.fa3edc3d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 03:34:53PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:50:40 +0800
> Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> > 
> > Add the missing unlock before return from function fill_balloon()
> > in the error handling case.
> > 
> > Introduced by 9864a8(virtio_balloon: introduce migration primitives
> > to balloon pages)
> > 
> > dpatch engine is used to auto generate this patch.
> > (https://github.com/weiyj/dpatch)
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> > ---
> >  drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> > index f70151b..72e8dcb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> > @@ -152,8 +152,10 @@ static void fill_balloon(struct virtio_balloon *vb, size_t num)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	/* Didn't get any?  Oh well. */
> > -	if (vb->num_pfns == 0)
> > +	if (vb->num_pfns == 0) {
> > +		mutex_unlock(&vb->balloon_lock);
> >  		return;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	tell_host(vb, vb->inflate_vq);
> >  	mutex_unlock(&vb->balloon_lock);
> 
> Well.  Why did this bug occur in the first place?  Because
> fill_balloon() has multiple return points and one of those was
> overlooked when adding new locking.
> 
> This (and the addition of memory leaks) is quite common.  It is part of
> the reason why so much kernel code uses goto's to avoid multiple return
> points.  A maintainability thing.
> 
> And we can fix this shortcoming in fill_balloon() without even needing a
> goto:
> 
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c~virtio_balloon-introduce-migration-primitives-to-balloon-pages-fix-fix
> +++ a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> @@ -151,13 +151,9 @@ static void fill_balloon(struct virtio_b
>  		totalram_pages--;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Didn't get any?  Oh well. */
> -	if (vb->num_pfns == 0) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&vb->balloon_lock);
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
> -	tell_host(vb, vb->inflate_vq);
> +	/* Did we get any? */
> +	if (vb->num_pfns != 0)
> +		tell_host(vb, vb->inflate_vq);
>  	mutex_unlock(&vb->balloon_lock);
>  }
>

Your fix is far better, as it simplifies the code without loosing that test --
which only evaluates as true, if we fail to allocate a page right after getting
into the loop -- /me thinks driver folks place it there to not bother
tell_host() and the virt_queues if no pageframe is present at that pfns array.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@gmail.com>,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au, mst@redhat.com,
	yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] virtio: balloon: fix missing unlock on error in fill_balloon()
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:47:48 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121113124748.GA1636@optiplex.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121112153453.fa3edc3d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 03:34:53PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:50:40 +0800
> Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> > 
> > Add the missing unlock before return from function fill_balloon()
> > in the error handling case.
> > 
> > Introduced by 9864a8(virtio_balloon: introduce migration primitives
> > to balloon pages)
> > 
> > dpatch engine is used to auto generate this patch.
> > (https://github.com/weiyj/dpatch)
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> > ---
> >  drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> > index f70151b..72e8dcb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> > @@ -152,8 +152,10 @@ static void fill_balloon(struct virtio_balloon *vb, size_t num)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	/* Didn't get any?  Oh well. */
> > -	if (vb->num_pfns == 0)
> > +	if (vb->num_pfns == 0) {
> > +		mutex_unlock(&vb->balloon_lock);
> >  		return;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	tell_host(vb, vb->inflate_vq);
> >  	mutex_unlock(&vb->balloon_lock);
> 
> Well.  Why did this bug occur in the first place?  Because
> fill_balloon() has multiple return points and one of those was
> overlooked when adding new locking.
> 
> This (and the addition of memory leaks) is quite common.  It is part of
> the reason why so much kernel code uses goto's to avoid multiple return
> points.  A maintainability thing.
> 
> And we can fix this shortcoming in fill_balloon() without even needing a
> goto:
> 
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c~virtio_balloon-introduce-migration-primitives-to-balloon-pages-fix-fix
> +++ a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> @@ -151,13 +151,9 @@ static void fill_balloon(struct virtio_b
>  		totalram_pages--;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Didn't get any?  Oh well. */
> -	if (vb->num_pfns == 0) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&vb->balloon_lock);
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
> -	tell_host(vb, vb->inflate_vq);
> +	/* Did we get any? */
> +	if (vb->num_pfns != 0)
> +		tell_host(vb, vb->inflate_vq);
>  	mutex_unlock(&vb->balloon_lock);
>  }
>

Your fix is far better, as it simplifies the code without loosing that test --
which only evaluates as true, if we fail to allocate a page right after getting
into the loop -- /me thinks driver folks place it there to not bother
tell_host() and the virt_queues if no pageframe is present at that pfns array.



  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-13 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-12 13:50 [PATCH -next] virtio: balloon: fix missing unlock on error in fill_balloon() Wei Yongjun
2012-11-12 13:50 ` Wei Yongjun
2012-11-12 14:16 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-11-12 14:16   ` Rafael Aquini
2012-11-12 23:34 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-12 23:34   ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-13 12:47   ` Rafael Aquini [this message]
2012-11-13 12:47     ` Rafael Aquini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121113124748.GA1636@optiplex.redhat.com \
    --to=aquini@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=weiyj.lk@gmail.com \
    --cc=yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.