All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Vasilis Liaskovitis <vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com,
	wency@cn.fujitsu.com, lenb@kernel.org, toshi.kani@hp.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] acpi: Introduce prepare_remove device operation
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:33:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121116213310.GA12925@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11897248.2VNutIHaJi@vostro.rjw.lan>

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:17:17PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, November 15, 2012 11:22:47 AM Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
> > As discussed in https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1581581/
> > the driver core remove function needs to always succeed. This means we need
> > to know that the device can be successfully removed before acpi_bus_trim / 
> > acpi_bus_hot_remove_device are called. This can cause panics when OSPM-initiated
> > eject or driver unbind of memory devices fails e.g with:
> > 
> > echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject
> > echo "PNP0C80:XX" > /sys/bus/acpi/drivers/acpi_memhotplug/unbind
> > 
> > since the ACPI core goes ahead and ejects the device regardless of whether the
> > the memory is still in use or not.
> > 
> > For this reason a new acpi_device operation called prepare_remove is introduced.
> > This operation should be registered for acpi devices whose removal (from kernel
> > perspective) can fail.  Memory devices fall in this category.
> > A similar operation is introduced in bus_type to safely handle driver unbind
> > from the device driver core.
> > 
> > acpi_bus_hot_remove_device and driver_unbind are changed to handle removal in 2
> > steps:
> > - preparation for removal i.e. perform part of removal that can fail. Should
> >   succeed for device and all its children.
> > - if above step was successfull, proceed to actual device removal
> > 
> > With this patchset, only acpi memory devices use the new prepare_remove
> > device operation. The actual memory removal (VM-related offline and other memory
> > cleanups) is moved to prepare_remove. The old remove operation just cleans up
> > the acpi structures. Directly ejecting PNP0C80 memory devices works safely. I
> > haven't tested yet with an ACPI container which contains memory devices.
> > 
> > v1->v2:
> > - new patch to introduce bus_type prepare_remove callback. Needed to prepare
> > removal on driver unbinding from device-driver core.
> > - v1 patches 1 and 2 simplified and merged in one. acpi_bus_trim does not require
> > argument changes.
> > 
> > Comments welcome.
> > 
> > Vasilis Liaskovitis (3):
> >   driver core: Introduce prepare_remove in bus_type
> >   acpi: Introduce prepare_remove operation in acpi_device_ops
> >   acpi_memhotplug: Add prepare_remove operation
> > 
> >  drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c |   22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  drivers/acpi/scan.c            |   21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/base/bus.c             |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h        |    2 ++
> >  include/linux/device.h         |    2 ++
> >  5 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> CCs of all driver core patches have to go to Greg Kroah-Hartman.

I previously rejected this, so I don't see why I would take it this time
around :(

Please, no driver core changes for acpi, I don't see why it is suddenly
so special to need stuff like this that can't just be done in the ACPI
bus code itself.

thanks,

greg k-h

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Vasilis Liaskovitis <vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com,
	wency@cn.fujitsu.com, lenb@kernel.org, toshi.kani@hp.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] acpi: Introduce prepare_remove device operation
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:33:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121116213310.GA12925@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11897248.2VNutIHaJi@vostro.rjw.lan>

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:17:17PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, November 15, 2012 11:22:47 AM Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
> > As discussed in https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1581581/
> > the driver core remove function needs to always succeed. This means we need
> > to know that the device can be successfully removed before acpi_bus_trim / 
> > acpi_bus_hot_remove_device are called. This can cause panics when OSPM-initiated
> > eject or driver unbind of memory devices fails e.g with:
> > 
> > echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject
> > echo "PNP0C80:XX" > /sys/bus/acpi/drivers/acpi_memhotplug/unbind
> > 
> > since the ACPI core goes ahead and ejects the device regardless of whether the
> > the memory is still in use or not.
> > 
> > For this reason a new acpi_device operation called prepare_remove is introduced.
> > This operation should be registered for acpi devices whose removal (from kernel
> > perspective) can fail.  Memory devices fall in this category.
> > A similar operation is introduced in bus_type to safely handle driver unbind
> > from the device driver core.
> > 
> > acpi_bus_hot_remove_device and driver_unbind are changed to handle removal in 2
> > steps:
> > - preparation for removal i.e. perform part of removal that can fail. Should
> >   succeed for device and all its children.
> > - if above step was successfull, proceed to actual device removal
> > 
> > With this patchset, only acpi memory devices use the new prepare_remove
> > device operation. The actual memory removal (VM-related offline and other memory
> > cleanups) is moved to prepare_remove. The old remove operation just cleans up
> > the acpi structures. Directly ejecting PNP0C80 memory devices works safely. I
> > haven't tested yet with an ACPI container which contains memory devices.
> > 
> > v1->v2:
> > - new patch to introduce bus_type prepare_remove callback. Needed to prepare
> > removal on driver unbinding from device-driver core.
> > - v1 patches 1 and 2 simplified and merged in one. acpi_bus_trim does not require
> > argument changes.
> > 
> > Comments welcome.
> > 
> > Vasilis Liaskovitis (3):
> >   driver core: Introduce prepare_remove in bus_type
> >   acpi: Introduce prepare_remove operation in acpi_device_ops
> >   acpi_memhotplug: Add prepare_remove operation
> > 
> >  drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c |   22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  drivers/acpi/scan.c            |   21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/base/bus.c             |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h        |    2 ++
> >  include/linux/device.h         |    2 ++
> >  5 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> CCs of all driver core patches have to go to Greg Kroah-Hartman.

I previously rejected this, so I don't see why I would take it this time
around :(

Please, no driver core changes for acpi, I don't see why it is suddenly
so special to need stuff like this that can't just be done in the ACPI
bus code itself.

thanks,

greg k-h

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-16 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-15 10:22 [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] acpi: Introduce prepare_remove device operation Vasilis Liaskovitis
2012-11-15 10:22 ` Vasilis Liaskovitis
2012-11-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] driver core: Introduce prepare_remove in bus_type Vasilis Liaskovitis
2012-11-15 10:22   ` Vasilis Liaskovitis
2012-11-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] acpi: Introduce prepare_remove operation in acpi_device_ops Vasilis Liaskovitis
2012-11-15 10:22   ` Vasilis Liaskovitis
2012-11-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] acpi_memhotplug: Add prepare_remove operation Vasilis Liaskovitis
2012-11-15 10:22   ` Vasilis Liaskovitis
2012-11-16 21:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] acpi: Introduce prepare_remove device operation Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 21:17   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 21:33   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2012-11-16 21:33     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-16 21:41     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 21:41       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 21:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 21:43   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 22:45   ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-16 22:45     ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-16 23:01     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-16 23:01       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-16 23:14       ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-16 23:14         ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-16 23:33         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-16 23:33           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-16 23:35           ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-16 23:35             ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-17  0:02             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-17  0:02               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-17  0:08               ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-17  0:08                 ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-17  0:22                 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-17  0:22                   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-17  0:25                   ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-17  0:25                     ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-18 16:16                     ` Jiang Liu
2012-11-18 16:16                       ` Jiang Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121116213310.GA12925@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    --cc=vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com \
    --cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.