All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: kswapd endless loop for compaction
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:04:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121120190440.GA24381@cmpxchg.org> (raw)

Hi guys,

while testing a 3.7-rc5ish kernel, I noticed that kswapd can drop into
a busy spin state without doing reclaim.  printk-style debugging told
me that this happens when the distance between a zone's high watermark
and its low watermark is less than two huge pages (DMA zone).

1. The first loop in balance_pgdat() over the zones finds all zones to
be above their high watermark and only does goto out (all_zones_ok).

2. pgdat_balanced() at the out: label also just checks the high
watermark, so the node is considered balanced and the order is not
reduced.

3. In the `if (order)' block after it, compaction_suitable() checks if
the zone's low watermark + twice the huge page size is okay, which
it's not necessarily in a small zone, and so COMPACT_SKIPPED makes it
it go back to loop_again:.

This will go on until somebody else allocates and breaches the high
watermark and then hopefully goes on to reclaim the zone above low
watermark + 2 * THP.

I'm not really sure what the correct solution is.  Should we modify
the zone_watermark_ok() checks in balance_pgdat() to take into account
the higher watermark requirements for reclaim on behalf of compaction?
Change the check in compaction_suitable() / not use it directly?

Thanks,
Johannes

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: kswapd endless loop for compaction
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:04:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121120190440.GA24381@cmpxchg.org> (raw)

Hi guys,

while testing a 3.7-rc5ish kernel, I noticed that kswapd can drop into
a busy spin state without doing reclaim.  printk-style debugging told
me that this happens when the distance between a zone's high watermark
and its low watermark is less than two huge pages (DMA zone).

1. The first loop in balance_pgdat() over the zones finds all zones to
be above their high watermark and only does goto out (all_zones_ok).

2. pgdat_balanced() at the out: label also just checks the high
watermark, so the node is considered balanced and the order is not
reduced.

3. In the `if (order)' block after it, compaction_suitable() checks if
the zone's low watermark + twice the huge page size is okay, which
it's not necessarily in a small zone, and so COMPACT_SKIPPED makes it
it go back to loop_again:.

This will go on until somebody else allocates and breaches the high
watermark and then hopefully goes on to reclaim the zone above low
watermark + 2 * THP.

I'm not really sure what the correct solution is.  Should we modify
the zone_watermark_ok() checks in balance_pgdat() to take into account
the higher watermark requirements for reclaim on behalf of compaction?
Change the check in compaction_suitable() / not use it directly?

Thanks,
Johannes

             reply	other threads:[~2012-11-20 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-20 19:04 Johannes Weiner [this message]
2012-11-20 19:04 ` kswapd endless loop for compaction Johannes Weiner
2012-11-21 22:01 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-11-21 22:01   ` Johannes Weiner
2012-11-22 14:40 ` Jaegeuk Hanse
2012-11-22 14:40   ` Jaegeuk Hanse
2012-11-23  8:50 ` Jaegeuk Hanse
2012-11-23  8:50   ` Jaegeuk Hanse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121120190440.GA24381@cmpxchg.org \
    --to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.