All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* there *is* no libdrm_2.4.39 in oe-core anymore, it's now 2.4.40
@ 2012-11-20 19:20 Robert P. J. Day
  2012-11-20 20:42 ` Nicolas Dechesne
  2012-11-20 20:48 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2012-11-20 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: meta-ti mailing list


  only 5 days ago, oe-core upgraded libdrm to 2.4.40, so the recent
meta-ti addition of libdrm_2.4.39.bbappend doesn't really do much
good.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: there *is* no libdrm_2.4.39 in oe-core anymore, it's now 2.4.40
  2012-11-20 19:20 there *is* no libdrm_2.4.39 in oe-core anymore, it's now 2.4.40 Robert P. J. Day
@ 2012-11-20 20:42 ` Nicolas Dechesne
  2012-11-20 20:49   ` Robert P. J. Day
  2012-11-20 20:48 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Dechesne @ 2012-11-20 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Robert P. J. Day; +Cc: meta-ti mailing list

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1155 bytes --]

Le 20 nov. 2012 20:21, "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> a écrit :
>
>
>   only 5 days ago, oe-core upgraded libdrm to 2.4.40, so the recent
> meta-ti addition of libdrm_2.4.39.bbappend doesn't really do much
> good.

Yes. That is what i reported earlier today. And that's why we discussed
that we need to create the danny branch in meta-ti since danny still uses
libdrm 2.39.

Once we create danny branch we can revert the libdrm bbappend commit in
master (and xf86-video-omap as well since it was merged in oe-core too)

>
> rday
>
> --
>
> ========================================================================
> Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
>                         http://crashcourse.ca
>
> Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
> LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
> ========================================================================
> _______________________________________________
> meta-ti mailing list
> meta-ti@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1627 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: there *is* no libdrm_2.4.39 in oe-core anymore, it's now 2.4.40
  2012-11-20 19:20 there *is* no libdrm_2.4.39 in oe-core anymore, it's now 2.4.40 Robert P. J. Day
  2012-11-20 20:42 ` Nicolas Dechesne
@ 2012-11-20 20:48 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Denys Dmytriyenko @ 2012-11-20 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Robert P. J. Day; +Cc: meta-ti mailing list

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:20:51PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 
>   only 5 days ago, oe-core upgraded libdrm to 2.4.40, so the recent
> meta-ti addition of libdrm_2.4.39.bbappend doesn't really do much
> good.

Yes, please pay attention - here's the parallel discussion from today:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.embedded.yocto.meta-ti/1163

And the change in OE-Core master just happened yesterday:
http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=8b100befe8dcf7523148b6fc14fa2237d07fe556

-- 
Denys


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: there *is* no libdrm_2.4.39 in oe-core anymore, it's now 2.4.40
  2012-11-20 20:42 ` Nicolas Dechesne
@ 2012-11-20 20:49   ` Robert P. J. Day
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2012-11-20 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nicolas Dechesne; +Cc: meta-ti mailing list

On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:

> Yes. That is what i reported earlier today. And that's why we
> discussed that we need to create the danny branch in meta-ti since
> danny still uses libdrm 2.39.
>
> Once we create danny branch we can revert the libdrm bbappend commit
> in master (and xf86-video-omap as well since it was merged in
> oe-core too)

  ah, sorry, i must have missed that.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-11-20 20:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-11-20 19:20 there *is* no libdrm_2.4.39 in oe-core anymore, it's now 2.4.40 Robert P. J. Day
2012-11-20 20:42 ` Nicolas Dechesne
2012-11-20 20:49   ` Robert P. J. Day
2012-11-20 20:48 ` Denys Dmytriyenko

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.