All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
	<gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	devicetree-discuss
	<devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Have of_device_add call platform_device_add rather than device_add
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:30:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121122173020.GA8473@obsidianresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121122153621.452CA3E129E@localhost>

On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 03:36:21PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:

> Hmm... I've not tried it with assigned-address. I tried with two sibling
> platform devices using just the 'reg' property. That the kernel will
> complain about. For powerpc-only, the patch I posted allows the device
> to get registered anyway even though the range incorrectly overlaps.

My second example was done with the reg property..

                gpio0: gpio@10100 {
                        compatible = "marvell,orion-gpio";
                        #gpio-cells = <2>;
                        gpio-controller;
                        reg = <0x10100 0x40>;
                }
                chip_cfg@0 {
                        compatible = "orc,chip_config";
                        // Doubles up on gpio0
                        reg = <0x10100 0x4>;
                };


f1010100-f101013f : /internal@f1000000/gpio@10100
  f1010100-f1010103 : /internal@f1000000/chip_cfg@0

What did you try? Maybe order matters?

Regards,
Jason

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Have of_device_add call platform_device_add rather than device_add
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:30:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121122173020.GA8473@obsidianresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121122153621.452CA3E129E@localhost>

On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 03:36:21PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:

> Hmm... I've not tried it with assigned-address. I tried with two sibling
> platform devices using just the 'reg' property. That the kernel will
> complain about. For powerpc-only, the patch I posted allows the device
> to get registered anyway even though the range incorrectly overlaps.

My second example was done with the reg property..

                gpio0: gpio@10100 {
                        compatible = "marvell,orion-gpio";
                        #gpio-cells = <2>;
                        gpio-controller;
                        reg = <0x10100 0x40>;
                }
                chip_cfg@0 {
                        compatible = "orc,chip_config";
                        // Doubles up on gpio0
                        reg = <0x10100 0x4>;
                };


f1010100-f101013f : /internal@f1000000/gpio@10100
  f1010100-f1010103 : /internal@f1000000/chip_cfg@0

What did you try? Maybe order matters?

Regards,
Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-22 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-21  7:24 [PATCH] of: Have of_device_add call platform_device_add rather than device_add Jason Gunthorpe
2012-11-21 15:51 ` Grant Likely
2012-11-21 16:05   ` Grant Likely
2012-11-21 17:44   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2012-11-21 18:07     ` Grant Likely
2012-11-21 18:14       ` Jason Gunthorpe
     [not found]         ` <20121121181430.GE6406-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-22 15:36           ` Grant Likely
2012-11-22 15:36             ` Grant Likely
2012-11-22 17:30             ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2012-11-22 17:30               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2012-11-26 14:30               ` Grant Likely
2012-11-26 15:28               ` Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121122173020.GA8473@obsidianresearch.com \
    --to=jgunthorpe-epgobjl8dl3ta4ec/59zmfatqe2ktcn/@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.