From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: ixp4xx: fixes for v3.7
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:54:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201211261854.14248.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMhRKfhjvhb0u+qADwpSJZbXEhXzbZAFgOdnbkmMgYy0mw@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday 26 November 2012, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > Olof, I'm undecided whether they are still appropriate for 3.7 since
> > we're past the final -rc now. If we want them in, we should probably
> > send them to Linus now and let him decide. For all I can tell, ixp4xx
> > is already completely broken without these patches, so there should be
> > no harm in including them, but then again " 13 files changed, 59
> > insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)" is slightly more than I'd like to send
> > at this point.
> >
> > If you prefer, we can put them into next/fixes-non-critical, but then we
> > might want to mark more of them as candidates for stable.
>
> Since the code has been broken for quite a while, I don't see a big
> urgency to get it in in the last week of a new release, but I can
> easily be persuaded differently. Had I done the pull, I would probably
> have merged them into fixes-non-critical myself.
I've just done a few pulls that I've found in my email backlog, but it
seems you already had everything under control, I was expecting more
work to be left over. I probably woudn't have started if I had known
it was this little. At least I have a good feeling about not having
missed anything important now.
> But, as I said, I don't have strong opinions on the matter. :)
I can send the pull request(s) for the fixes this time, so at least
Linus doesn't blame you for what I pulled in ;-)
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-26 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <0Lufa8-1TAtF11yb2-00zw9g@mx.kundenserver.de>
2012-11-26 13:14 ` [GIT PULL] ARM: ixp4xx: fixes for v3.7 Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-26 17:31 ` Olof Johansson
2012-11-26 18:54 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2012-11-26 19:15 ` Olof Johansson
2012-11-22 4:21 Jason Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201211261854.14248.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.