All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: Provide the STMPE GPIO driver with its own IRQ Domain
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 14:01:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121130140144.GD23648@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1353683949-9275-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>

On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Lee Jones wrote:

> The STMPE GPIO driver can be used as an IRQ controller by some
> related devices. Here we provide it with its very own IRQ Domain
> so that IRQs can be issued dynamically. This will stand the
> driver in good stead when it is enabled for Device Tree, as this
> it a prerequisite.
> 
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c |   67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c
> index dce3472..5a87ed6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/gpio.h>
>  #include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/mfd/stmpe.h>
>  
> @@ -28,6 +29,7 @@ struct stmpe_gpio {
>  	struct stmpe *stmpe;
>  	struct device *dev;
>  	struct mutex irq_lock;
> +	struct irq_domain *domain;
>  
>  	int irq_base;
>  	unsigned norequest_mask;
> @@ -267,38 +269,55 @@ static irqreturn_t stmpe_gpio_irq(int irq, void *dev)
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> -static int __devinit stmpe_gpio_irq_init(struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio)
> +int stmpe_gpio_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
> +		       irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
>  {
> -	int base = stmpe_gpio->irq_base;
> -	int irq;
> +	struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio = d->host_data;
> +
> +	if (!stmpe_gpio)
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	for (irq = base; irq < base + stmpe_gpio->chip.ngpio; irq++) {
> -		irq_set_chip_data(irq, stmpe_gpio);
> -		irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &stmpe_gpio_irq_chip,
> -					 handle_simple_irq);
> -		irq_set_nested_thread(irq, 1);
> +	irq_set_chip_data(hwirq, stmpe_gpio);
> +	irq_set_chip_and_handler(hwirq, &stmpe_gpio_irq_chip,
> +				 handle_simple_irq);
> +	irq_set_nested_thread(hwirq, 1);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> -		set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID);
> +	set_irq_flags(hwirq, IRQF_VALID);
>  #else
> -		irq_set_noprobe(irq);
> +	irq_set_noprobe(hwirq);
>  #endif
> -	}
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static void stmpe_gpio_irq_remove(struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio)
> +void stmpe_gpio_irq_unmap(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq)
>  {
> -	int base = stmpe_gpio->irq_base;
> -	int irq;
> -
> -	for (irq = base; irq < base + stmpe_gpio->chip.ngpio; irq++) {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> -		set_irq_flags(irq, 0);
> +	set_irq_flags(virq, 0);
>  #endif
> -		irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, NULL, NULL);
> -		irq_set_chip_data(irq, NULL);
> +	irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, NULL, NULL);
> +	irq_set_chip_data(virq, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops stmpe_gpio_irq_simple_ops = {
> +	.unmap = stmpe_gpio_irq_unmap,
> +	.map = stmpe_gpio_irq_map,
> +	.xlate = irq_domain_xlate_twocell,
> +};
> +
> +static int __devinit stmpe_gpio_irq_init(struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio)
> +{
> +	int base = stmpe_gpio->irq_base;
> +
> +	stmpe_gpio->domain = irq_domain_add_simple(NULL,
> +				stmpe_gpio->chip.ngpio, base,
> +				&stmpe_gpio_irq_simple_ops, stmpe_gpio);
> +	if (!stmpe_gpio->domain) {
> +		dev_err(stmpe_gpio->dev, "failed to create irqdomain\n");
> +		return -ENOSYS;
>  	}
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int __devinit stmpe_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -348,7 +367,7 @@ static int __devinit stmpe_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  				IRQF_ONESHOT, "stmpe-gpio", stmpe_gpio);
>  		if (ret) {
>  			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to get irq: %d\n", ret);
> -			goto out_removeirq;
> +			goto out_disable;
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> @@ -368,9 +387,6 @@ static int __devinit stmpe_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  out_freeirq:
>  	if (irq >= 0)
>  		free_irq(irq, stmpe_gpio);
> -out_removeirq:
> -	if (irq >= 0)
> -		stmpe_gpio_irq_remove(stmpe_gpio);
>  out_disable:
>  	stmpe_disable(stmpe, STMPE_BLOCK_GPIO);
>  out_free:
> @@ -398,10 +414,9 @@ static int __devexit stmpe_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	stmpe_disable(stmpe, STMPE_BLOCK_GPIO);
>  
> -	if (irq >= 0) {
> +	if (irq >= 0)
>  		free_irq(irq, stmpe_gpio);
> -		stmpe_gpio_irq_remove(stmpe_gpio);
> -	}
> +
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>  	kfree(stmpe_gpio);
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5

Poke.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, linus.walleij@stericsson.com,
	viresh.kumar@linaro.org, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: Provide the STMPE GPIO driver with its own IRQ Domain
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 14:01:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121130140144.GD23648@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1353683949-9275-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>

On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Lee Jones wrote:

> The STMPE GPIO driver can be used as an IRQ controller by some
> related devices. Here we provide it with its very own IRQ Domain
> so that IRQs can be issued dynamically. This will stand the
> driver in good stead when it is enabled for Device Tree, as this
> it a prerequisite.
> 
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c |   67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c
> index dce3472..5a87ed6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/gpio.h>
>  #include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/mfd/stmpe.h>
>  
> @@ -28,6 +29,7 @@ struct stmpe_gpio {
>  	struct stmpe *stmpe;
>  	struct device *dev;
>  	struct mutex irq_lock;
> +	struct irq_domain *domain;
>  
>  	int irq_base;
>  	unsigned norequest_mask;
> @@ -267,38 +269,55 @@ static irqreturn_t stmpe_gpio_irq(int irq, void *dev)
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> -static int __devinit stmpe_gpio_irq_init(struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio)
> +int stmpe_gpio_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
> +		       irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
>  {
> -	int base = stmpe_gpio->irq_base;
> -	int irq;
> +	struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio = d->host_data;
> +
> +	if (!stmpe_gpio)
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	for (irq = base; irq < base + stmpe_gpio->chip.ngpio; irq++) {
> -		irq_set_chip_data(irq, stmpe_gpio);
> -		irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &stmpe_gpio_irq_chip,
> -					 handle_simple_irq);
> -		irq_set_nested_thread(irq, 1);
> +	irq_set_chip_data(hwirq, stmpe_gpio);
> +	irq_set_chip_and_handler(hwirq, &stmpe_gpio_irq_chip,
> +				 handle_simple_irq);
> +	irq_set_nested_thread(hwirq, 1);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> -		set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID);
> +	set_irq_flags(hwirq, IRQF_VALID);
>  #else
> -		irq_set_noprobe(irq);
> +	irq_set_noprobe(hwirq);
>  #endif
> -	}
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static void stmpe_gpio_irq_remove(struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio)
> +void stmpe_gpio_irq_unmap(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq)
>  {
> -	int base = stmpe_gpio->irq_base;
> -	int irq;
> -
> -	for (irq = base; irq < base + stmpe_gpio->chip.ngpio; irq++) {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> -		set_irq_flags(irq, 0);
> +	set_irq_flags(virq, 0);
>  #endif
> -		irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, NULL, NULL);
> -		irq_set_chip_data(irq, NULL);
> +	irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, NULL, NULL);
> +	irq_set_chip_data(virq, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops stmpe_gpio_irq_simple_ops = {
> +	.unmap = stmpe_gpio_irq_unmap,
> +	.map = stmpe_gpio_irq_map,
> +	.xlate = irq_domain_xlate_twocell,
> +};
> +
> +static int __devinit stmpe_gpio_irq_init(struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio)
> +{
> +	int base = stmpe_gpio->irq_base;
> +
> +	stmpe_gpio->domain = irq_domain_add_simple(NULL,
> +				stmpe_gpio->chip.ngpio, base,
> +				&stmpe_gpio_irq_simple_ops, stmpe_gpio);
> +	if (!stmpe_gpio->domain) {
> +		dev_err(stmpe_gpio->dev, "failed to create irqdomain\n");
> +		return -ENOSYS;
>  	}
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int __devinit stmpe_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -348,7 +367,7 @@ static int __devinit stmpe_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  				IRQF_ONESHOT, "stmpe-gpio", stmpe_gpio);
>  		if (ret) {
>  			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to get irq: %d\n", ret);
> -			goto out_removeirq;
> +			goto out_disable;
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> @@ -368,9 +387,6 @@ static int __devinit stmpe_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  out_freeirq:
>  	if (irq >= 0)
>  		free_irq(irq, stmpe_gpio);
> -out_removeirq:
> -	if (irq >= 0)
> -		stmpe_gpio_irq_remove(stmpe_gpio);
>  out_disable:
>  	stmpe_disable(stmpe, STMPE_BLOCK_GPIO);
>  out_free:
> @@ -398,10 +414,9 @@ static int __devexit stmpe_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	stmpe_disable(stmpe, STMPE_BLOCK_GPIO);
>  
> -	if (irq >= 0) {
> +	if (irq >= 0)
>  		free_irq(irq, stmpe_gpio);
> -		stmpe_gpio_irq_remove(stmpe_gpio);
> -	}
> +
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>  	kfree(stmpe_gpio);
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5

Poke.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-30 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-23 15:19 [PATCH 1/1] gpio: Provide the STMPE GPIO driver with its own IRQ Domain Lee Jones
2012-11-23 15:19 ` Lee Jones
2012-11-30 14:01 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2012-11-30 14:01   ` Lee Jones
2012-12-01 16:25 ` Linus Walleij
2012-12-01 16:25   ` Linus Walleij
2012-12-04  9:14   ` Lee Jones
2012-12-04  9:14     ` Lee Jones
2012-12-10 10:07 ` [PATCH 1/1 v2] " Lee Jones
2012-12-10 10:07   ` Lee Jones
2012-12-10 10:21   ` Linus Walleij
2012-12-10 10:21     ` Linus Walleij
2012-12-10 10:26     ` Lee Jones
2012-12-10 10:26       ` Lee Jones
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-11-23 12:44 [PATCH 1/1] " Lee Jones
2012-11-23 12:44 ` Lee Jones
2012-11-23 12:58 ` Viresh Kumar
2012-11-23 12:58   ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121130140144.GD23648@gmail.com \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.