From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: krkumar2@in.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
bhutchings@solarflare.com, jwhan@filewood.snu.ac.kr,
shiyer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next rfc v7 2/3] virtio_net: multiqueue support
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:35:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121204073503.GB7499@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50BC7F59.301@redhat.com>
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 06:30:49PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 12/03/2012 06:14 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 06:15:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >> > - if (!try_fill_recv(&vi->rq, GFP_KERNEL))
> >> > - schedule_delayed_work(&vi->rq.refill, 0);
> >> > + for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
> >> > + if (!try_fill_recv(&vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL))
> >> > + schedule_delayed_work(&vi->rq[i].refill, 0);
> >> >
> >> > mutex_lock(&vi->config_lock);
> >> > vi->config_enable = true;
> >> > mutex_unlock(&vi->config_lock);
> >> >
> >> > + BUG_ON(virtnet_set_queues(vi));
> >> > +
> >> > return 0;
> >> > }
> >> > #endif
> > Also crashing on device nack of command is also not nice.
> > In this case it seems we can just switch to
> > single-queue mode which should always be safe.
>
> Not sure it's safe. It depends on the reason why this call fails. If we
> left a state that the driver only use single queue but the device use
> multi queues, we may still lost the network.
Looks like we won't: napi will stay enabled on all queues
so we will process incoming packets.
--
MST
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, krkumar2@in.ibm.com,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, bhutchings@solarflare.com,
jwhan@filewood.snu.ac.kr, shiyer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next rfc v7 2/3] virtio_net: multiqueue support
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:35:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121204073503.GB7499@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50BC7F59.301@redhat.com>
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 06:30:49PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 12/03/2012 06:14 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 06:15:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >> > - if (!try_fill_recv(&vi->rq, GFP_KERNEL))
> >> > - schedule_delayed_work(&vi->rq.refill, 0);
> >> > + for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
> >> > + if (!try_fill_recv(&vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL))
> >> > + schedule_delayed_work(&vi->rq[i].refill, 0);
> >> >
> >> > mutex_lock(&vi->config_lock);
> >> > vi->config_enable = true;
> >> > mutex_unlock(&vi->config_lock);
> >> >
> >> > + BUG_ON(virtnet_set_queues(vi));
> >> > +
> >> > return 0;
> >> > }
> >> > #endif
> > Also crashing on device nack of command is also not nice.
> > In this case it seems we can just switch to
> > single-queue mode which should always be safe.
>
> Not sure it's safe. It depends on the reason why this call fails. If we
> left a state that the driver only use single queue but the device use
> multi queues, we may still lost the network.
Looks like we won't: napi will stay enabled on all queues
so we will process incoming packets.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-04 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-27 10:15 [net-next rfc v7 0/3] Multiqueue virtio-net Jason Wang
2012-11-27 10:15 ` Jason Wang
2012-11-27 10:15 ` [net-next rfc v7 1/3] virtio-net: separate fields of sending/receiving queue from virtnet_info Jason Wang
2012-11-27 10:15 ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 1:55 ` Rusty Russell
2012-12-03 1:55 ` Rusty Russell
2012-12-03 5:15 ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 11:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-03 11:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-04 9:22 ` Jason Wang
2012-12-04 9:22 ` Jason Wang
2012-12-04 3:43 ` Rusty Russell
2012-12-04 3:43 ` Rusty Russell
2012-12-04 9:23 ` Jason Wang
2012-12-04 9:23 ` Jason Wang
2012-11-27 10:15 ` [net-next rfc v7 2/3] virtio_net: multiqueue support Jason Wang
2012-11-27 10:15 ` Jason Wang
2012-12-02 16:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-02 16:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-03 5:47 ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 5:47 ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 2:04 ` Rusty Russell
2012-12-03 2:04 ` Rusty Russell
2012-12-03 6:05 ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 6:05 ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 9:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-03 9:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-03 10:01 ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 10:01 ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 11:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-03 11:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-04 9:24 ` Jason Wang
2012-12-04 9:24 ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 10:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-03 10:30 ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 10:30 ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 11:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-03 11:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-04 7:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2012-12-04 7:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-04 9:27 ` Jason Wang
2012-12-04 9:27 ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 10:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-11-27 10:16 ` [net-next rfc v7 3/3] virtio-net: change the number of queues through ethtool Jason Wang
2012-11-27 10:16 ` Jason Wang
2012-12-02 16:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-02 16:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-03 6:09 ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 6:09 ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 11:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-03 11:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-04 0:22 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-12-04 0:22 ` Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121204073503.GB7499@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jwhan@filewood.snu.ac.kr \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shiyer@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.