From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/5] discontiguous buffer patches
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:18:01 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121204231801.982422341@sgi.com> (raw)
Eric Sundeen's "userspace vs. fragmented multiblock dir2", xfstest 291
commit 2a4ed, causes a xfs_buf lock hang:
[<ffffffff81065d87>] down+0x47/0x50
[<ffffffffa03a25c6>] xfs_buf_lock+0x66/0xe0 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa03a33c9>] _xfs_buf_find+0x1f9/0x320 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa03a393f>] xfs_buf_get_map+0x2f/0x170 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa03a3f7a>] xfs_buf_read_map+0x2a/0x100 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa0411630>] xfs_trans_read_buf_map+0x3b0/0x590 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa03e1c5e>] xfs_da_read_buf+0xbe/0x230 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa03e78dc>] xfs_dir2_block_addname+0x7c/0x980 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa03f1468>] xfs_dir2_sf_addname+0x3e8/0x450 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa03e634c>] xfs_dir_createname+0x17c/0x1e0 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa03b9fe2>] xfs_create+0x4c2/0x5f0 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa03b0c8a>] xfs_vn_mknod+0x8a/0x1a0 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa03b0dce>] xfs_vn_create+0xe/0x10 [xfs]
[<ffffffff8115695c>] vfs_create+0xac/0xd0
[<ffffffff811587de>] do_last+0x8be/0x960
[<ffffffff8115940c>] path_openat+0xdc/0x410
[<ffffffff81159853>] do_filp_open+0x43/0xa0
[<ffffffff8114a502>] do_sys_open+0x152/0x1e0
[<ffffffff8114a5cc>] sys_open+0x1c/0x20
[<ffffffff81423df9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
Changes to the series from version 2:
Patch 2: The renaming of b_map to __b_map is in its own patch.
Patch 3: The buffer log format assert is in its own patch and simplies the
initialization per Dave's suggestion.
Patch 5: The XFS_TRANS_DEBUG is completely removed from xfs.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next reply other threads:[~2012-12-04 23:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-04 23:18 Mark Tinguely [this message]
2012-12-04 23:18 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] xfs: use b_maps[] for discontiguous buffers Mark Tinguely
2012-12-08 12:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-12-04 23:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] xfs: rename bli_format to avoid confusion with bli_formats Mark Tinguely
2012-12-08 12:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-12-04 23:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] xfs: fix segment in xfs_buf_item_format_segment Mark Tinguely
2012-12-08 12:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-12-10 1:34 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-04 23:18 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] xfs: fix the multi-segment log buffer format Mark Tinguely
2012-12-08 12:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-12-10 1:59 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-04 23:18 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] xfs remove the XFS_TRANS_DEBUG routines Mark Tinguely
2012-12-08 12:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121204231801.982422341@sgi.com \
--to=tinguely@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.