From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] xfs: fix the multi-segment log buffer format
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 07:38:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121208123821.GD29107@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121204224938.906216248@sgi.com>
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 05:18:05PM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> Per Dave Chinner suggestion, this patch:
> 1) Corrects the detection of whether a multi-segment buffer is
> still tracking data.
> 2) Clears all the buffer log formats for a multi-segment buffer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c | 7 +++++--
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Index: b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
> @@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ xfs_buf_item_unlock(
> {
> struct xfs_buf_log_item *bip = BUF_ITEM(lip);
> struct xfs_buf *bp = bip->bli_buf;
> - int aborted;
> + int aborted, clean, i;
> uint hold;
>
> /* Clear the buffer's association with this transaction. */
> @@ -654,8 +654,15 @@ xfs_buf_item_unlock(
> * If the buf item isn't tracking any data, free it, otherwise drop the
> * reference we hold to it.
> */
> - if (xfs_bitmap_empty(bip->__bli_format.blf_data_map,
> - bip->__bli_format.blf_map_size))
> + clean = 1;
> + for (i = 0; i < bip->bli_format_count; i++) {
> + if (!xfs_bitmap_empty(bip->bli_formats[i].blf_data_map,
> + bip->bli_formats[i].blf_map_size)) {
> + clean = 0;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + if (clean)
> xfs_buf_item_relse(bp);
> else
> atomic_dec(&bip->bli_refcount);
Looks ok, although avoiding the clean variable would be even better:
for (i = 0; i < bip->bli_format_count; i++) {
if (!xfs_bitmap_empty(bip->bli_formats[i].blf_data_map,
bip->bli_formats[i].blf_map_size)) {
atomic_dec(&bip->bli_refcount);
goto out;
}
}
xfs_buf_item_relse(bp);
out:
bu that might be getting a bit too much into bikeshedding.
What I'm worried more about is how we semi-duplicate this bli_refcount
decrement vs xfs_buf_item_relse in xfs_trans_brelse, but use the
xfs_buf_item_dirty (aka XFS_BLI_DIRTY) check there instead.
It seems like the proper fix might be to:
- only set XFS_BLI_DIRTY in xfs_buf_item_log if we actually set
any bits in a bitmap
- use the XFS_BLI_DIRTY check in xfs_buf_item_unlock as well
- kill the useless xfs_buf_item_dirty wrapper
Probably both of these aren't worth doing it for now as we'll need to
get fixes into Linus tree quickly, so:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-08 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-04 23:18 [PATCH v3 0/5] discontiguous buffer patches Mark Tinguely
2012-12-04 23:18 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] xfs: use b_maps[] for discontiguous buffers Mark Tinguely
2012-12-08 12:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-12-04 23:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] xfs: rename bli_format to avoid confusion with bli_formats Mark Tinguely
2012-12-08 12:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-12-04 23:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] xfs: fix segment in xfs_buf_item_format_segment Mark Tinguely
2012-12-08 12:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-12-10 1:34 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-04 23:18 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] xfs: fix the multi-segment log buffer format Mark Tinguely
2012-12-08 12:38 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2012-12-10 1:59 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-04 23:18 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] xfs remove the XFS_TRANS_DEBUG routines Mark Tinguely
2012-12-08 12:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121208123821.GD29107@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=tinguely@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.