All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC v1 01/16] lib: devres: don't enclose pcim_*() functions in CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:29:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121211172916.2668a5be@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121211173819.6f2cf32b@skate>

> Could you enlighten my very naive understanding of things about PCI/ISA
> IO space? On x86, I seem to understand this is the separate address
> space accessed by the special in/out CPU instructions. Are there ARM
> platforms with the same sort of things?

An x86 processor has two address spaces

A memory space
An I/O space

They are both visible to the PCI bus and both transaction types are
present on the bus and distinct.

> As far as I understand, on my ARM Marvell system, everything is
> memory-mapped, so there isn't such a separate PCI/ISA IO space.

There is if you ask the PCI bridge or beyond.

> Therefore, why would I need to "select HAVE_IOPORT" simply to be able
> to build libata-sff.c, that is used for PCI drivers that work fine with
> purely memory-mapped registers?

Because the drivers talk to the hardware beyond the bridge which knows
the difference.


So on x86 we have

	inb(0xf00);

	generates an I/O transaction on the PCI bus for I/O 0xf00

	*0xf00

	generates a memory transacion on the PCI bus for memory 0xf00
	and the two are *not* the same thing or address

On many other platforms we have 

	inb(0xf00)

	actually produces the equivalent of (*io_window+0xf00)

	which the PCI bridge turns into an I/O transaction for 0xf00

	(and for the out case may have an explicit barrier needed to get
	the I/O ordering rules)

	while

	*0xf00

	gets turned by the bridge into a memory transaction for 0xf00



The "no I/O space" case really applies to things like the S/390 mainframe
which simply have no such concept on the system or the devices. In the
ARM case the bus has an I/O space and the bridge glues the processors
simpler model to the bridge model.

For compatibility reasons (so you an boot old software) the PCI bus also
has some automatic magic mappings in I/O space, and a lot of LPC bus
devices also have magic I/O mappings. For example a SATA controller in
compatibility mode appears at a specified I/O address on the bus and is
always on a specific IRQ (matching the old ISA PC mappings which map the
old ISA MFM controller mappings whose offsets map compatiblity to the
register mappings for the WD MFM controller used on the PC/AT)

In PC space this stuff is important and it's why up until Windows 7 era
PC hardware you can boot DOS, as well as being why you can have one
generic kernel for almost any PC hardware instead of the one per board
problem some other platforms have.

Alan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Yehuda Yitschak <yehuday@marvell.com>,
	Maen Suleiman <maen@marvell.com>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@marvell.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	Eran Ben-Avi <benavi@marvell.com>,
	Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	Shadi Ammouri <shadi@marvell.com>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 01/16] lib: devres: don't enclose pcim_*() functions in CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:29:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121211172916.2668a5be@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121211173819.6f2cf32b@skate>

> Could you enlighten my very naive understanding of things about PCI/ISA
> IO space? On x86, I seem to understand this is the separate address
> space accessed by the special in/out CPU instructions. Are there ARM
> platforms with the same sort of things?

An x86 processor has two address spaces

A memory space
An I/O space

They are both visible to the PCI bus and both transaction types are
present on the bus and distinct.

> As far as I understand, on my ARM Marvell system, everything is
> memory-mapped, so there isn't such a separate PCI/ISA IO space.

There is if you ask the PCI bridge or beyond.

> Therefore, why would I need to "select HAVE_IOPORT" simply to be able
> to build libata-sff.c, that is used for PCI drivers that work fine with
> purely memory-mapped registers?

Because the drivers talk to the hardware beyond the bridge which knows
the difference.


So on x86 we have

	inb(0xf00);

	generates an I/O transaction on the PCI bus for I/O 0xf00

	*0xf00

	generates a memory transacion on the PCI bus for memory 0xf00
	and the two are *not* the same thing or address

On many other platforms we have 

	inb(0xf00)

	actually produces the equivalent of (*io_window+0xf00)

	which the PCI bridge turns into an I/O transaction for 0xf00

	(and for the out case may have an explicit barrier needed to get
	the I/O ordering rules)

	while

	*0xf00

	gets turned by the bridge into a memory transaction for 0xf00



The "no I/O space" case really applies to things like the S/390 mainframe
which simply have no such concept on the system or the devices. In the
ARM case the bus has an I/O space and the bridge glues the processors
simpler model to the bridge model.

For compatibility reasons (so you an boot old software) the PCI bus also
has some automatic magic mappings in I/O space, and a lot of LPC bus
devices also have magic I/O mappings. For example a SATA controller in
compatibility mode appears at a specified I/O address on the bus and is
always on a specific IRQ (matching the old ISA PC mappings which map the
old ISA MFM controller mappings whose offsets map compatiblity to the
register mappings for the WD MFM controller used on the PC/AT)

In PC space this stuff is important and it's why up until Windows 7 era
PC hardware you can boot DOS, as well as being why you can have one
generic kernel for almost any PC hardware instead of the one per board
problem some other platforms have.

Alan


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-12-11 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 133+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-07 22:04 [RFC v1] PCIe support for the Armada 370 and Armada XP SoCs Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-07 22:04 ` [RFC v1 01/16] lib: devres: don't enclose pcim_*() functions in CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-07 22:04   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-11 10:43   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-12-11 10:43     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-12-11 16:03     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-11 16:03       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-11 16:15       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-12-11 16:15         ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-12-11 16:23         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-11 16:23           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-11 16:38           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-11 16:38             ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-11 16:50             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-11 16:50               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-11 17:29             ` Alan Cox [this message]
2012-12-11 17:29               ` Alan Cox
2012-12-11 22:20               ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-12-11 22:20                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-12-11 22:34           ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-12-11 22:34             ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-12-11 16:30         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-11 16:30           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-11 16:46           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-11 16:46             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-11 17:32             ` Alan Cox
2012-12-11 17:32               ` Alan Cox
2012-12-11 22:28               ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-12-11 22:28                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-12-11 16:55           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-11 16:55             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-11 16:26     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-11 16:26       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-11 17:16       ` Alan Cox
2012-12-11 17:16         ` Alan Cox
2012-12-11 17:34         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-11 17:34           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-11 17:45           ` Alan Cox
2012-12-11 17:45             ` Alan Cox
2012-12-11 17:51             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-11 17:51               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-07 22:04 ` [RFC v1 02/16] clk: mvebu: create parent-child relation for PCIe clocks on Armada 370 Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-07 22:04 ` [RFC v1 03/16] arm: plat-orion: introduce WIN_CTRL_ENABLE in address mapping code Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-07 22:04 ` [RFC v1 04/16] arm: plat-orion: refactor the orion_disable_wins() function Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-07 22:04 ` [RFC v1 05/16] arm: plat-orion: introduce orion_{alloc, free}_cpu_win() functions Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-08 11:53   ` [RFC v1 05/16] arm: plat-orion: introduce orion_{alloc,free}_cpu_win() functions Andrew Lunn
2012-12-08 12:15     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-07 22:04 ` [RFC v1 06/16] arm: mvebu: add functions to alloc/free PCIe decoding windows Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-07 22:04 ` [RFC v1 07/16] arm: plat-orion: make common PCIe code usable on mvebu Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-07 22:04 ` [RFC v1 08/16] arm: mvebu: the core PCIe driver Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-10  8:28   ` Andrew Lunn
2012-12-10  8:45     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-10 19:08   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2012-12-11 10:56   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-12-12 15:58     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-12 21:51       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2012-12-13 14:58         ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-12-13 17:40           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2012-12-13 19:09             ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-14 19:34         ` Rob Herring
2012-12-13 12:19       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-12-13 17:54         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2012-12-13 19:12           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-13 21:46             ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-12-13 22:27               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2012-12-07 22:04 ` [RFC v1 09/16] arm: mvebu: PCIe support is now available on mvebu Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-07 22:04 ` [RFC v1 10/16] arm: mvebu: add PCIe Device Tree informations for Armada 370 Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-07 22:04 ` [RFC v1 11/16] arm: mvebu: add PCIe Device Tree informations for Armada XP Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-07 22:04 ` [RFC v1 12/16] arm: mvebu: PCIe Device Tree informations for OpenBlocks AX3-4 Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-07 22:04 ` [RFC v1 13/16] arm: mvebu: PCIe Device Tree informations for Armada XP DB Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-07 22:04 ` [RFC v1 14/16] arm: mvebu: PCIe Device Tree informations for Armada 370 Mirabox Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-07 22:04 ` [RFC v1 15/16] arm: mvebu: PCIe Device Tree informations for Armada 370 DB Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-07 22:04 ` [RFC v1 16/16] arm: mvebu: update defconfig with PCI and USB support Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-07 23:33 ` [RFC v1] PCIe support for the Armada 370 and Armada XP SoCs Jason Gunthorpe
2012-12-10 17:52   ` Stephen Warren
2012-12-10 18:05     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-10 18:16       ` Stephen Warren
2012-12-10 18:59         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-10 19:07           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2012-12-10 20:08           ` Stephen Warren
2012-12-10 18:44     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2012-12-10 19:03       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-10 19:18         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2012-12-12 16:04           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-12 20:09             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2012-12-16 13:02               ` Thierry Reding
2012-12-11  7:52     ` Thierry Reding
2012-12-11 21:21       ` Stephen Warren
2012-12-12 20:34         ` Thierry Reding
2012-12-12 22:30           ` Stephen Warren
2012-12-13  7:03             ` Thierry Reding
2012-12-13  8:04               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2012-12-13  8:23                 ` Thierry Reding
2012-12-13 18:12                   ` Stephen Warren
2012-12-13 20:42                     ` Thierry Reding
2012-12-13 20:47                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2012-12-13 21:16                         ` Thierry Reding
2012-12-14 10:05                         ` Thierry Reding
2012-12-14 15:10                       ` Thierry Reding
2012-12-14 17:27                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2012-12-16 12:33                           ` Thierry Reding
2012-12-17 18:29                             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2012-12-17 19:41                               ` Thierry Reding
2012-12-18  2:10                                 ` Stephen Warren
2012-12-18  2:51                                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2012-12-18 17:03                                     ` Stephen Warren
2012-12-20 15:32                                       ` Thierry Reding
2012-12-21 13:38                                         ` Jay Agarwal
2012-12-21 14:03                                           ` Thierry Reding
2012-12-22 14:50                                         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-28 21:06                                           ` Thierry Reding
2012-12-28 21:16                                             ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-28 23:49                                               ` Stephen Warren
2012-12-29  8:09                                                 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-31 16:40                                                   ` Stephen Warren
2012-12-29  9:33                                                 ` Thierry Reding
2012-12-31 16:44                                                   ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-02 20:09                                                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-01-03 14:20                                                     ` Thierry Reding
2012-12-28 23:51                                         ` Stephen Warren
2012-12-18  7:32                                   ` Thierry Reding
2013-01-03 14:39 ` Thierry Reding
2013-01-03 14:39   ` Thierry Reding
2013-01-03 15:00   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-03 15:00     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-03 15:11     ` Thierry Reding
2013-01-03 15:11       ` Thierry Reding
2013-01-03 15:09   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-03 15:09     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-03 15:56   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-03 15:56     ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-03 16:01     ` Thierry Reding
2013-01-03 16:01       ` Thierry Reding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121211172916.2668a5be@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk \
    --to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.