All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Guo Chao <yan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ext3, ext4, ocfs2: remove unused macro NAMEI_RA_INDEX
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:48:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121218174811.GC5987@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355820999-27972-1-git-send-email-yan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Tue 18-12-12 16:56:39, Guo Chao wrote:
> This macro, initially introduced by ext2 in v0.99.15, does not
> have any users from the beginning. It has been removed in later
> ext2 version but still remains in the code of ext3, ext4, ocfs2.
> Remove this macro there.
  Thanks. I've merged the patch into my tree. Since it's trivial, I guess
other fs maintainers won't mind.

								Honza
> 
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
> Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
> Signed-off-by: Guo Chao <yan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  fs/ext3/namei.c |    1 -
>  fs/ext4/namei.c |    1 -
>  fs/ocfs2/dir.c  |    1 -
>  3 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext3/namei.c b/fs/ext3/namei.c
> index 890b894..88f64eb 100644
> --- a/fs/ext3/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/ext3/namei.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@
>  #define NAMEI_RA_CHUNKS  2
>  #define NAMEI_RA_BLOCKS  4
>  #define NAMEI_RA_SIZE        (NAMEI_RA_CHUNKS * NAMEI_RA_BLOCKS)
> -#define NAMEI_RA_INDEX(c,b)  (((c) * NAMEI_RA_BLOCKS) + (b))
>  
>  static struct buffer_head *ext3_append(handle_t *handle,
>  					struct inode *inode,
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c
> index cac4482..3f8c3d4 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,6 @@
>  #define NAMEI_RA_CHUNKS  2
>  #define NAMEI_RA_BLOCKS  4
>  #define NAMEI_RA_SIZE	     (NAMEI_RA_CHUNKS * NAMEI_RA_BLOCKS)
> -#define NAMEI_RA_INDEX(c,b)  (((c) * NAMEI_RA_BLOCKS) + (b))
>  
>  static struct buffer_head *ext4_append(handle_t *handle,
>  					struct inode *inode,
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> index 8fe4e28..fc12135 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> @@ -67,7 +67,6 @@
>  #define NAMEI_RA_CHUNKS  2
>  #define NAMEI_RA_BLOCKS  4
>  #define NAMEI_RA_SIZE        (NAMEI_RA_CHUNKS * NAMEI_RA_BLOCKS)
> -#define NAMEI_RA_INDEX(c,b)  (((c) * NAMEI_RA_BLOCKS) + (b))
>  
>  static unsigned char ocfs2_filetype_table[] = {
>  	DT_UNKNOWN, DT_REG, DT_DIR, DT_CHR, DT_BLK, DT_FIFO, DT_SOCK, DT_LNK
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Guo Chao <yan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [RFC PATCH] ext3, ext4, ocfs2: remove unused macro NAMEI_RA_INDEX
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:48:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121218174811.GC5987@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355820999-27972-1-git-send-email-yan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Tue 18-12-12 16:56:39, Guo Chao wrote:
> This macro, initially introduced by ext2 in v0.99.15, does not
> have any users from the beginning. It has been removed in later
> ext2 version but still remains in the code of ext3, ext4, ocfs2.
> Remove this macro there.
  Thanks. I've merged the patch into my tree. Since it's trivial, I guess
other fs maintainers won't mind.

								Honza
> 
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
> Cc: linux-ext4 at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com
> Signed-off-by: Guo Chao <yan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  fs/ext3/namei.c |    1 -
>  fs/ext4/namei.c |    1 -
>  fs/ocfs2/dir.c  |    1 -
>  3 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext3/namei.c b/fs/ext3/namei.c
> index 890b894..88f64eb 100644
> --- a/fs/ext3/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/ext3/namei.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@
>  #define NAMEI_RA_CHUNKS  2
>  #define NAMEI_RA_BLOCKS  4
>  #define NAMEI_RA_SIZE        (NAMEI_RA_CHUNKS * NAMEI_RA_BLOCKS)
> -#define NAMEI_RA_INDEX(c,b)  (((c) * NAMEI_RA_BLOCKS) + (b))
>  
>  static struct buffer_head *ext3_append(handle_t *handle,
>  					struct inode *inode,
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c
> index cac4482..3f8c3d4 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,6 @@
>  #define NAMEI_RA_CHUNKS  2
>  #define NAMEI_RA_BLOCKS  4
>  #define NAMEI_RA_SIZE	     (NAMEI_RA_CHUNKS * NAMEI_RA_BLOCKS)
> -#define NAMEI_RA_INDEX(c,b)  (((c) * NAMEI_RA_BLOCKS) + (b))
>  
>  static struct buffer_head *ext4_append(handle_t *handle,
>  					struct inode *inode,
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> index 8fe4e28..fc12135 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> @@ -67,7 +67,6 @@
>  #define NAMEI_RA_CHUNKS  2
>  #define NAMEI_RA_BLOCKS  4
>  #define NAMEI_RA_SIZE        (NAMEI_RA_CHUNKS * NAMEI_RA_BLOCKS)
> -#define NAMEI_RA_INDEX(c,b)  (((c) * NAMEI_RA_BLOCKS) + (b))
>  
>  static unsigned char ocfs2_filetype_table[] = {
>  	DT_UNKNOWN, DT_REG, DT_DIR, DT_CHR, DT_BLK, DT_FIFO, DT_SOCK, DT_LNK
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-18 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-18  8:56 [RFC PATCH] ext3, ext4, ocfs2: remove unused macro NAMEI_RA_INDEX Guo Chao
2012-12-18 17:48 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2012-12-18 17:48   ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Jan Kara
2012-12-18 20:51   ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-18 20:51     ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-18 23:26   ` Mark Fasheh
2012-12-18 23:26     ` Mark Fasheh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121218174811.GC5987@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.