From: Dave Chinner <david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>,
kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org,
Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org>,
Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] super: fix calculation of shrinkable objects for small numbers
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:06:57 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121220070657.GV15182@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355906418-3603-2-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:40:17PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> The sysctl knob sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure is used to determine which
> percentage of the shrinkable objects in our cache we should actively try
> to shrink.
>
> It works great in situations in which we have many objects (at least
> more than 100), because the aproximation errors will be negligible. But
> if this is not the case, specially when total_objects < 100, we may end
> up concluding that we have no objects at all (total / 100 = 0, if total
> < 100).
>
> This is certainly not the biggest killer in the world, but may matter in
> very low kernel memory situations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
> CC: Dave Chinner <david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>
> CC: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org>
> CC: Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> fs/super.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
> index 12f1237..660552c 100644
> --- a/fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/super.c
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static int prune_super(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
> sb->s_nr_inodes_unused + fs_objects;
> }
>
> - total_objects = (total_objects / 100) * sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure;
> + total_objects = mult_frac(total_objects, sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure, 100);
> drop_super(sb);
> return total_objects;
Hi Glauber,
sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure all over the place with exactly the same
calculation. Can you fix all of them in one pass?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] super: fix calculation of shrinkable objects for small numbers
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:06:57 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121220070657.GV15182@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355906418-3603-2-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:40:17PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> The sysctl knob sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure is used to determine which
> percentage of the shrinkable objects in our cache we should actively try
> to shrink.
>
> It works great in situations in which we have many objects (at least
> more than 100), because the aproximation errors will be negligible. But
> if this is not the case, specially when total_objects < 100, we may end
> up concluding that we have no objects at all (total / 100 = 0, if total
> < 100).
>
> This is certainly not the biggest killer in the world, but may matter in
> very low kernel memory situations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
> CC: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
> CC: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
> CC: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> ---
> fs/super.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
> index 12f1237..660552c 100644
> --- a/fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/super.c
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static int prune_super(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
> sb->s_nr_inodes_unused + fs_objects;
> }
>
> - total_objects = (total_objects / 100) * sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure;
> + total_objects = mult_frac(total_objects, sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure, 100);
> drop_super(sb);
> return total_objects;
Hi Glauber,
sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure all over the place with exactly the same
calculation. Can you fix all of them in one pass?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-20 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-19 8:40 [PATCH 0/2] slightly change shrinker behaviour for very small object sets Glauber Costa
2012-12-19 8:40 ` Glauber Costa
2012-12-19 8:40 ` Glauber Costa
2012-12-19 8:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] super: fix calculation of shrinkable objects for small numbers Glauber Costa
2012-12-19 8:40 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <1355906418-3603-2-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-12-20 7:06 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2012-12-20 7:06 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-20 10:59 ` Glauber Costa
2012-12-20 10:59 ` Glauber Costa
2012-12-20 10:59 ` Glauber Costa
2012-12-19 8:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] vmscan: take at least one pass with shrinkers Glauber Costa
2012-12-19 8:40 ` Glauber Costa
2012-12-20 7:08 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121220070657.GV15182@dastard \
--to=david-fqsqvqoi3ljby3ivrkzq2a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.