All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] Ensure that kernel_init_freeable() is not inlined into non __init code
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:20:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121221072056.GS4939@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1356072944-23800-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com>

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:25:44PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Commit d6b2123802d "make sure that we always have a return path from
> kernel_execve()" reshuffled kernel_init()/init_post() to ensure that
> kernel_execve() has a caller to return to.
> 
> It removed __init annotation for kernel_init() and introduced/calls a
> new routine kernel_init_freeable(). Latter however is inlined by any
> reasonable compiler (ARC gcc 4.4 in this case), causing slight code
> bloat.

Interesting...  I assumed that explicitly set different section would be
enough, but I'd been wrong (or the original noinline would've been pointless,
now that I think of it).  Consider it ACKed; I can pick it through signal.git,
and while it's not urgent I'd send it to Linus after -rc1, with Cc: stable.
Or you can send it to him yourself with my usual Acked-by - up to you.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-21  7:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-21  6:55 [PATCH RESEND] Ensure that kernel_init_freeable() is not inlined into non __init code Vineet Gupta
2012-12-21  7:20 ` Al Viro [this message]
2012-12-21  7:23   ` Vineet Gupta
2012-12-26  4:56     ` Vineet Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121221072056.GS4939@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jim.cromie@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.