From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
Vipul Kumar Samar <vipulkumar.samar@st.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: stmpe: Pull IRQ GPIO number from DT during DT-based probe
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 15:03:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130107150341.GT21994@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1357568989-16237-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de>
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013, Marek Vasut wrote:
> In case of a DT-based probe of the stmpe MFD driver, the irq_gpio was zero,
> which resulted in the driver failing to probe.
>
> Implement DT properties "irq-over-gpio" and "irq-gpios" which are already used
> in "arch/arm/boot/dts/spear320-hmi.dts" to circumvent these problems.
This must have slipped through the gaps. It should be removed.
> The new
> behaviour is the expected one and copies the behavior of platform_data-based
> probe.
Blindly copying platform data behaviour to DT bindings is seldom a good idea.
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Vipul Kumar Samar <vipulkumar.samar@st.com>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/stmpe.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/stmpe.c b/drivers/mfd/stmpe.c
> index 4b11202..fb9cd6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/stmpe.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/stmpe.c
> @@ -1018,6 +1018,11 @@ void stmpe_of_probe(struct stmpe_platform_data *pdata, struct device_node *np)
> pdata->id = -1;
> pdata->irq_trigger = IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE;
>
> + pdata->irq_over_gpio = of_get_property(np, "irq-over-gpio", NULL);
This is a new DT binding and you haven't provided any documentation for it.
Also, there is no reason for the binding to exist.
Lots of drivers use GPIO pins as IRQs.
> + pdata->irq_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "irq-gpios", 0);
> + if (!gpio_is_valid(pdata->irq_gpio))
> + pdata->irq_gpio = -1;
> +
> of_property_read_u32(np, "st,autosleep-timeout",
> &pdata->autosleep_timeout);
>
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mfd: stmpe: Pull IRQ GPIO number from DT during DT-based probe
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 15:03:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130107150341.GT21994@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1357568989-16237-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de>
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013, Marek Vasut wrote:
> In case of a DT-based probe of the stmpe MFD driver, the irq_gpio was zero,
> which resulted in the driver failing to probe.
>
> Implement DT properties "irq-over-gpio" and "irq-gpios" which are already used
> in "arch/arm/boot/dts/spear320-hmi.dts" to circumvent these problems.
This must have slipped through the gaps. It should be removed.
> The new
> behaviour is the expected one and copies the behavior of platform_data-based
> probe.
Blindly copying platform data behaviour to DT bindings is seldom a good idea.
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Vipul Kumar Samar <vipulkumar.samar@st.com>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/stmpe.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/stmpe.c b/drivers/mfd/stmpe.c
> index 4b11202..fb9cd6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/stmpe.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/stmpe.c
> @@ -1018,6 +1018,11 @@ void stmpe_of_probe(struct stmpe_platform_data *pdata, struct device_node *np)
> pdata->id = -1;
> pdata->irq_trigger = IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE;
>
> + pdata->irq_over_gpio = of_get_property(np, "irq-over-gpio", NULL);
This is a new DT binding and you haven't provided any documentation for it.
Also, there is no reason for the binding to exist.
Lots of drivers use GPIO pins as IRQs.
> + pdata->irq_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "irq-gpios", 0);
> + if (!gpio_is_valid(pdata->irq_gpio))
> + pdata->irq_gpio = -1;
> +
> of_property_read_u32(np, "st,autosleep-timeout",
> &pdata->autosleep_timeout);
>
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-07 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-07 14:29 [PATCH] mfd: stmpe: Pull IRQ GPIO number from DT during DT-based probe Marek Vasut
2013-01-07 14:29 ` Marek Vasut
2013-01-07 15:03 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2013-01-07 15:03 ` Lee Jones
2013-01-07 15:13 ` Marek Vasut
2013-01-07 15:13 ` Marek Vasut
2013-01-07 15:44 ` Lee Jones
2013-01-07 15:44 ` Lee Jones
2013-01-07 18:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-01-07 18:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-01-08 3:52 ` vipul kumar samar
2013-01-08 3:52 ` vipul kumar samar
2013-01-08 9:41 ` Lee Jones
2013-01-08 9:41 ` Lee Jones
2013-01-08 9:44 ` Marek Vasut
2013-01-08 9:44 ` Marek Vasut
2013-01-08 9:48 ` Marek Vasut
2013-01-08 9:48 ` Marek Vasut
2013-01-08 10:47 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-01-08 10:47 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-01-08 11:11 ` Lee Jones
2013-01-08 11:11 ` Lee Jones
2013-01-08 11:14 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-01-08 11:14 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-01-08 11:18 ` Laxman Dewangan
2013-01-08 11:18 ` Laxman Dewangan
2013-01-08 11:23 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-01-08 11:23 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-01-10 11:42 ` Linus Walleij
2013-01-10 11:42 ` Linus Walleij
2013-01-10 12:57 ` Lee Jones
2013-01-10 12:57 ` Lee Jones
2013-02-08 22:51 ` Grant Likely
2013-02-08 22:51 ` Grant Likely
2013-02-14 16:26 ` Marek Vasut
2013-02-14 16:26 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130107150341.GT21994@gmail.com \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vipulkumar.samar@st.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.