Re: [PATCH 5/5] kfifo: log based kfifo API

[Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>]

On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:16:46AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Yuanhan,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:57:53PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > The current kfifo API take the kfifo size as input, while it rounds
> >  _down_ the size to power of 2 at __kfifo_alloc. This may introduce
> > potential issue.
> > 
> > Take the code at drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c as example:
> > 
> > 	if (kfifo_alloc(&djrcv_dev->notif_fifo,
> >                        DJ_MAX_NUMBER_NOTIFICATIONS * sizeof(struct dj_report),
> >                        GFP_KERNEL)) {
> > 
> > Where, DJ_MAX_NUMBER_NOTIFICATIONS is 8, and sizeo of(struct dj_report)
> > is 15.
> > 
> > Which means it wants to allocate a kfifo buffer which can store 8
> > dj_report entries at once. The expected kfifo buffer size would be
> > 8 * 15 = 120 then. While, in the end, __kfifo_alloc will turn the
> > size to rounddown_power_of_2(120) =  64, and then allocate a buf
> > with 64 bytes, which I don't think this is the original author want.
> > 
> > With the new log API, we can do like following:
> > 
> > 	int kfifo_size_order = order_base_2(DJ_MAX_NUMBER_NOTIFICATIONS *
> > 					    sizeof(struct dj_report));
> > 
> > 	if (kfifo_alloc(&djrcv_dev->notif_fifo, kfifo_size_order, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> > 
> > This make sure we will allocate enough kfifo buffer for holding
> > DJ_MAX_NUMBER_NOTIFICATIONS dj_report entries.
> 
> Why don't you simply change __kfifo_alloc to round the allocation up
> instead of down?

Hi Dmitry,

Yes, it would be neat and that was my first reaction as well. I then
sent out a patch, but it was NACKed by Stefani(the original kfifo
author). Here is the link:

    https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/26/144

Then Stefani proposed to change the API to take log of size as input to
root fix this kind of issues. And here it is.

Thanks.

	--yliu