Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] videobuf2-dma-streaming: new videobuf2 memory allocator

[Michael Olbrich <m.olbrich@pengutronix.de>]

On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 07:31:30AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 07:50:41 +0100
> Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> wrote:
> 
> > > Couldn't this performance difference be due to the usage of GFP_DMA inside
> > > the VB2 code, like Federico's new patch series is proposing?
> > >
> > > If not, why are there a so large performance penalty?  
> > 
> > Nope, this was caused rather by a very poor CPU access to non-cached (aka
> > 'coherent') memory and the way the video data has been accessed/read 
> > with CPU.
> 
> Exactly.  Uncached memory *hurts*, especially if you're having to touch it
> all with the CPU.

Even worse, on ARMv7 (at least) the cache implements or is necessary for
(I'm not an expert here) unaligned access. I've seen applications crash
on non-cached memory with a bus error because gcc assumes unaligned access
works. And there isn't even a exception handler in the kernel, probably for
the same reason.

Michael

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |