All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
To: Riccardo Magliocchetti <riccardo.magliocchetti@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v2] fadvise: perform WILLNEED readahead asynchronously
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:14:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130110111403.GA730@dcvr.yhbt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50EE8B6B.1050204@gmail.com>

Riccardo Magliocchetti <riccardo.magliocchetti@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Il 25/12/2012 03:22, Eric Wong ha scritto:
> > Any other (Free Software) applications that might benefit from
> > lower FADV_WILLNEED latency?
> 
> Not with fadvise but with madvise. Libreoffice / Openoffice.org have
> this comment:
> 
> // On Linux, madvise(..., MADV_WILLNEED) appears to have the undesirable
> // effect of not returning until the data has actually been paged in, so
> // that its net effect would typically be to slow down the process
> // (which could start processing at the beginning of the data while the
> // OS simultaneously pages in the rest); on other platforms, it remains
> // to be evaluated whether madvise or equivalent is available and
> // actually useful:
> 
> See:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/sal/osl/unx/file.cxx#n1213
> 
> May the same approach be extended to madvise MADV_WILLNEED?

Definitely yes, it should be easy.  This project low-priority for me at
the moment, if you or anybody else wants to take a stab at it,
please do :)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
To: Riccardo Magliocchetti <riccardo.magliocchetti@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v2] fadvise: perform WILLNEED readahead asynchronously
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:14:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130110111403.GA730@dcvr.yhbt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50EE8B6B.1050204@gmail.com>

Riccardo Magliocchetti <riccardo.magliocchetti@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Il 25/12/2012 03:22, Eric Wong ha scritto:
> > Any other (Free Software) applications that might benefit from
> > lower FADV_WILLNEED latency?
> 
> Not with fadvise but with madvise. Libreoffice / Openoffice.org have
> this comment:
> 
> // On Linux, madvise(..., MADV_WILLNEED) appears to have the undesirable
> // effect of not returning until the data has actually been paged in, so
> // that its net effect would typically be to slow down the process
> // (which could start processing at the beginning of the data while the
> // OS simultaneously pages in the rest); on other platforms, it remains
> // to be evaluated whether madvise or equivalent is available and
> // actually useful:
> 
> See:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/sal/osl/unx/file.cxx#n1213
> 
> May the same approach be extended to madvise MADV_WILLNEED?

Definitely yes, it should be easy.  This project low-priority for me at
the moment, if you or anybody else wants to take a stab at it,
please do :)

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-10 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-25  2:22 [PATCH v2] fadvise: perform WILLNEED readahead asynchronously Eric Wong
2012-12-25  2:22 ` Eric Wong
2012-12-27  7:01 ` Zheng Liu
2012-12-27  7:01   ` Zheng Liu
2013-01-05 11:46 ` Simon Jeons
2013-01-05 11:46   ` Simon Jeons
2013-01-10  4:05   ` Eric Wong
2013-01-10  4:05     ` Eric Wong
2013-01-10  9:35 ` [v2] " Riccardo Magliocchetti
2013-01-10  9:35   ` Riccardo Magliocchetti
2013-01-10 11:14   ` Eric Wong [this message]
2013-01-10 11:14     ` Eric Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130110111403.GA730@dcvr.yhbt.net \
    --to=normalperson@yhbt.net \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riccardo.magliocchetti@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.