From: gleb@redhat.com (Gleb Natapov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [kvmarm] [PATCH v5.1 0/2] KVM: ARM: Rename KVM_SET_DEVICE_ADDRESS
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:18:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130110111846.GN700@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <913D68AC-971B-4EF1-B300-137922213EF7@suse.de>
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:15:55PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 09.01.2013, at 23:34, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> >
> > On 09.01.2013, at 23:26, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> wrote:
> >>> On 01/09/2013 03:37:20 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Am 09.01.2013 um 22:15 schrieb Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I get that there's a tradeoff between getting something in now, versus
> >>>>> waiting until the API is more refined. Tagging it with a particular ISA
> >>>>> seems like an odd way of saying "soon to be deprecated", though. What
> >>>>> happens if we're still squabbling over the perfect replacement API when
> >>>>> we're trying to push PPC MPIC stuff in?
> >>>>
> >>>> Then we're the ones who have to come up with a good interface.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> How about another bad one, with PPC in the name, and some pleas to hurry
> >>> things up? :-)
> >>>
> >>> It's not as if there haven't been last-minute requests for API changes on
> >>> the PPC side in the past...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> This is getting out of hand.
> >>
> >> Do you have another API for PPC, which was send for review and not
> >> commented on several months ago that we can unify right now?
> >>
> >> If not, let's go with the ARM name and work on the generic API in the mean time.
> >>
> >> The end result will be something along 5 lines in a header files and 3
> >> lines in a switch case that return -EINVAL if the interface is
> >> completely deprecated later on, which is not a big problem.
> >
> > Agreed [1].
> >
> > So what exactly are we waiting for? Acks from kvm maintainers, right?
>
> In fact, we should probably CC them :)
>
>
I am looking at them right now :) Give me a couple of days please.
--
Gleb.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <c.dall@virtualopensystems.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
"<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
"<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [kvmarm] [PATCH v5.1 0/2] KVM: ARM: Rename KVM_SET_DEVICE_ADDRESS
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:18:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130110111846.GN700@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <913D68AC-971B-4EF1-B300-137922213EF7@suse.de>
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:15:55PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 09.01.2013, at 23:34, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> >
> > On 09.01.2013, at 23:26, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> wrote:
> >>> On 01/09/2013 03:37:20 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Am 09.01.2013 um 22:15 schrieb Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I get that there's a tradeoff between getting something in now, versus
> >>>>> waiting until the API is more refined. Tagging it with a particular ISA
> >>>>> seems like an odd way of saying "soon to be deprecated", though. What
> >>>>> happens if we're still squabbling over the perfect replacement API when
> >>>>> we're trying to push PPC MPIC stuff in?
> >>>>
> >>>> Then we're the ones who have to come up with a good interface.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> How about another bad one, with PPC in the name, and some pleas to hurry
> >>> things up? :-)
> >>>
> >>> It's not as if there haven't been last-minute requests for API changes on
> >>> the PPC side in the past...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> This is getting out of hand.
> >>
> >> Do you have another API for PPC, which was send for review and not
> >> commented on several months ago that we can unify right now?
> >>
> >> If not, let's go with the ARM name and work on the generic API in the mean time.
> >>
> >> The end result will be something along 5 lines in a header files and 3
> >> lines in a switch case that return -EINVAL if the interface is
> >> completely deprecated later on, which is not a big problem.
> >
> > Agreed [1].
> >
> > So what exactly are we waiting for? Acks from kvm maintainers, right?
>
> In fact, we should probably CC them :)
>
>
I am looking at them right now :) Give me a couple of days please.
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-10 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 158+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-08 18:41 [PATCH v5 00/12] KVM/ARM vGIC support Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 18:41 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 18:41 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] KVM: ARM: Introduce KVM_SET_DEVICE_ADDRESS ioctl Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 18:41 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 22:36 ` Scott Wood
2013-01-08 22:36 ` Scott Wood
2013-01-08 23:17 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 23:17 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 23:29 ` Scott Wood
2013-01-08 23:29 ` Scott Wood
2013-01-08 23:49 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 23:49 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-09 0:12 ` Scott Wood
2013-01-09 0:12 ` Scott Wood
2013-01-09 10:02 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-09 10:02 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-09 14:48 ` Peter Maydell
2013-01-09 14:48 ` Peter Maydell
2013-01-09 14:58 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-09 14:58 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-09 15:11 ` Peter Maydell
2013-01-09 15:11 ` Peter Maydell
2013-01-09 15:17 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-09 15:17 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-09 15:20 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-09 15:20 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-09 15:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-01-09 15:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-01-09 15:28 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-09 15:28 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-09 15:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-01-09 15:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-01-09 15:56 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-09 15:56 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-09 16:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-01-09 16:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-01-09 16:29 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-09 16:29 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 18:41 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] ARM: KVM: Keep track of currently running vcpus Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 18:41 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 18:41 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] ARM: gic: define GICH offsets for VGIC support Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 18:41 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 18:41 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] ARM: KVM: Initial VGIC infrastructure code Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 18:41 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-14 15:31 ` Will Deacon
2013-01-14 15:31 ` Will Deacon
2013-01-14 21:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-14 21:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-14 21:28 ` [kvmarm] " Alexander Graf
2013-01-14 21:28 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-14 22:50 ` Will Deacon
2013-01-14 22:50 ` Will Deacon
2013-01-15 10:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-01-15 10:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-01-08 18:41 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] ARM: KVM: VGIC accept vcpu and dist base addresses from user space Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 18:41 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 18:42 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] ARM: KVM: VGIC distributor handling Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 18:42 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-14 15:39 ` Will Deacon
2013-01-14 15:39 ` Will Deacon
2013-01-14 21:55 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-14 21:55 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 18:42 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] ARM: KVM: VGIC virtual CPU interface management Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 18:42 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-14 15:42 ` Will Deacon
2013-01-14 15:42 ` Will Deacon
2013-01-14 22:02 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-14 22:02 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-15 11:00 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-01-15 11:00 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-01-15 14:31 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-15 14:31 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-16 15:29 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-16 15:29 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-16 16:09 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-01-16 16:09 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-01-16 16:13 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-16 16:13 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-16 16:17 ` [kvmarm] " Marc Zyngier
2013-01-16 16:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-01-08 18:42 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] ARM: KVM: vgic: retire queued, disabled interrupts Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 18:42 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 18:42 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] ARM: KVM: VGIC interrupt injection Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 18:42 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 18:42 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] ARM: KVM: VGIC control interface world switch Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 18:42 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 18:42 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] ARM: KVM: VGIC initialisation code Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 18:42 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 18:42 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] ARM: KVM: Add VGIC configuration option Christoffer Dall
2013-01-08 18:42 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-09 13:28 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-01-09 13:28 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-01-09 16:42 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-09 16:42 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-09 16:26 ` [PATCH v5.1 0/2] KVM: ARM: Rename KVM_SET_DEVICE_ADDRESS Christoffer Dall
2013-01-09 16:26 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-09 16:26 ` [PATCH v5.1 1/2] KVM: ARM: Introduce KVM_SET_DEVICE_ADDRESS ioctl Christoffer Dall
2013-01-09 16:26 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-09 16:26 ` [PATCH v5.1 2/2] ARM: KVM: VGIC accept vcpu and dist base addresses from user space Christoffer Dall
2013-01-09 16:26 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-09 16:48 ` [kvmarm] [PATCH v5.1 0/2] KVM: ARM: Rename KVM_SET_DEVICE_ADDRESS Alexander Graf
2013-01-09 16:48 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-09 19:50 ` Scott Wood
2013-01-09 19:50 ` Scott Wood
2013-01-09 20:12 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-09 20:12 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-09 21:15 ` Scott Wood
2013-01-09 21:15 ` Scott Wood
2013-01-09 21:37 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-09 21:37 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-09 22:10 ` Scott Wood
2013-01-09 22:10 ` Scott Wood
2013-01-09 22:26 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-09 22:26 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-09 22:34 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-09 22:34 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-10 11:15 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-10 11:15 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-10 11:18 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2013-01-10 11:18 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-01-09 22:30 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-09 22:30 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-10 10:17 ` Peter Maydell
2013-01-10 10:17 ` Peter Maydell
2013-01-10 11:06 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-10 11:06 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-10 11:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-01-10 11:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-01-10 11:57 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-10 11:57 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-10 22:28 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-10 22:28 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-10 22:40 ` Scott Wood
2013-01-10 22:40 ` Scott Wood
2013-01-11 0:35 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-11 0:35 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-11 1:10 ` Scott Wood
2013-01-11 1:10 ` Scott Wood
2013-01-11 7:26 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-11 7:26 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-11 18:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-11 18:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-11 19:11 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-11 19:11 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-11 19:18 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-11 19:18 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-11 19:33 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-11 19:33 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-11 15:42 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-11 15:42 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-11 20:11 ` Scott Wood
2013-01-11 20:11 ` Scott Wood
2013-01-11 20:26 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-11 20:26 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-11 19:17 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-11 19:17 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-10 22:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-10 22:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130110111846.GN700@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.