All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: shmobile and struct sys_timer removal conflicts
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:42:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130115004230.GZ7185@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50F445E5.6010203@wwwdotorg.org>

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:52:37AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Simon,
> 
> I notice that the following shmobile-related commits in next-20130114
> add new ARM machine descriptors, but set the .timer field rather than
> the new .init_time field. I believe the code in these commits won't
> build in linux-next or Linux 3.9 once it's released:
> 
> a625586 ARM: mach-shmobile: kzm9g: Reference DT implementation
> ac0876f ARM: shmobile: armadillo800eva: Reference DT implementation
> be1fc65 ARM: shmobile: add a reference DT implementation for mackerel
> 66f1162 ARM: mach-shmobile: sh73a0: Minimal setup using DT
> 
> In order to solve this problem, you'll need to adjust those changes
> according to:
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git timer/cleanup
> 
> (where "adjust" is probably "rebase on top of")

Hi Stephen,

thanks. I'll get this sorted out.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: horms@verge.net.au (Simon Horman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: shmobile and struct sys_timer removal conflicts
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:42:30 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130115004230.GZ7185@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50F445E5.6010203@wwwdotorg.org>

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:52:37AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Simon,
> 
> I notice that the following shmobile-related commits in next-20130114
> add new ARM machine descriptors, but set the .timer field rather than
> the new .init_time field. I believe the code in these commits won't
> build in linux-next or Linux 3.9 once it's released:
> 
> a625586 ARM: mach-shmobile: kzm9g: Reference DT implementation
> ac0876f ARM: shmobile: armadillo800eva: Reference DT implementation
> be1fc65 ARM: shmobile: add a reference DT implementation for mackerel
> 66f1162 ARM: mach-shmobile: sh73a0: Minimal setup using DT
> 
> In order to solve this problem, you'll need to adjust those changes
> according to:
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git timer/cleanup
> 
> (where "adjust" is probably "rebase on top of")

Hi Stephen,

thanks. I'll get this sorted out.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-15  0:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-14 17:52 shmobile and struct sys_timer removal conflicts Stephen Warren
2013-01-14 17:52 ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-15  0:42 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2013-01-15  0:42   ` Simon Horman
2013-01-21  0:39   ` Simon Horman
2013-01-21  0:39     ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130115004230.GZ7185@verge.net.au \
    --to=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.