From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] net: fec: Add support for multiple phys on mdiobus
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:07:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130121100701.GX1906@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50FD02B8.8080401@grandegger.com>
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 09:56:24AM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> On 01/21/2013 09:37 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > There may be multiple phys on an mdio bus. This series adds support
> > for this to the fec driver. I recently had a board which has a switch
> > connected to the fec's mdio bus, so I had to pick the correct phy.
>
> Pick one PHY from a switch port? Well, does a PHY-less (or fixed-link)
> configuration for a switch not make more sense?
Yes, you're probably right.
> Various ARM Ethernet
> contoller drivers do not support it. I recently needed a hack for an
> AT91 board.
I wonder how we want to proceed. Should there be a devicetree property
'fixed-link' like done for fs_enet (and not recommended for new code,
stated in the comment above of_phy_connect_fixed_link)?
Currently I have a property 'phy' in the fec binding which has a phandle
to a phy provided by the fec's mdio bus, but this could equally well
point to a fixed dummy phy:
phy = &fixed-phy;
Currently there seems to be no common convention for the devicetree how
to handle such situations, or am I missing something?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
shawn.guo@linaro.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fec: Add support for multiple phys on mdiobus
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:07:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130121100701.GX1906@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50FD02B8.8080401@grandegger.com>
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 09:56:24AM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> On 01/21/2013 09:37 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > There may be multiple phys on an mdio bus. This series adds support
> > for this to the fec driver. I recently had a board which has a switch
> > connected to the fec's mdio bus, so I had to pick the correct phy.
>
> Pick one PHY from a switch port? Well, does a PHY-less (or fixed-link)
> configuration for a switch not make more sense?
Yes, you're probably right.
> Various ARM Ethernet
> contoller drivers do not support it. I recently needed a hack for an
> AT91 board.
I wonder how we want to proceed. Should there be a devicetree property
'fixed-link' like done for fs_enet (and not recommended for new code,
stated in the comment above of_phy_connect_fixed_link)?
Currently I have a property 'phy' in the fec binding which has a phandle
to a phy provided by the fec's mdio bus, but this could equally well
point to a fixed dummy phy:
phy = &fixed-phy;
Currently there seems to be no common convention for the devicetree how
to handle such situations, or am I missing something?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-21 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-21 8:37 [PATCH] net: fec: Add support for multiple phys on mdiobus Sascha Hauer
2013-01-21 8:37 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-01-21 8:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] net: fec: refactor dt probing Sascha Hauer
2013-01-21 8:37 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-01-21 17:48 ` Baruch Siach
2013-01-21 17:48 ` Baruch Siach
2013-01-21 18:27 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-01-21 18:27 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-01-21 8:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] net: fec: Add support for phys from devicetree Sascha Hauer
2013-01-21 8:37 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-01-21 8:56 ` [PATCH] net: fec: Add support for multiple phys on mdiobus Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-01-21 8:56 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-01-21 10:07 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2013-01-21 10:07 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-01-21 11:07 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-01-21 11:07 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-01-21 11:12 ` Florian Fainelli
2013-01-21 11:12 ` Florian Fainelli
2013-01-21 11:33 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-01-21 11:33 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-01-21 11:56 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-01-21 11:56 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-01-21 12:06 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-01-21 12:06 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-01-22 7:22 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-01-22 7:22 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-01-22 14:47 ` Florian Fainelli
2013-01-22 14:47 ` Florian Fainelli
2013-01-22 15:03 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-01-22 15:03 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-01-22 15:19 ` Florian Fainelli
2013-01-22 15:19 ` Florian Fainelli
2013-01-22 15:26 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-01-22 15:26 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130121100701.GX1906@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.