From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] ARM: ux500: Remove traces of the ios_handler from platform code
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:27:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130123112746.GJ15873@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZnDi8F7Zu646CPEt9SAx5gA=v0CJ-Rq1eJqKS_s2EHvw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Linus Walleij
> <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Now MMCI on/off functionality is using the regulator framework
> >> from the MMCI driver, there is no need to keep the ios_handler
> >> laying around, duplicating functionality. So we're removing it.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >
> > Applied to my ux500-cleanups branch.
>
> Or no, wait, that is dependent or Russell's tree so will not
> be bisectable.
>
> Either submit sequel patches to [1/8] through Russell's
> patch tracker (based on his tree I guess) or wait for these
> to hit mainline and push them after that.
>
> Acked-by anway, on all of the cleanups following [1/8].
I have this queued already, with the MMCI patch in as a dependency.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
linus.walleij@stericsson.com, ulf.hansson@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] ARM: ux500: Remove traces of the ios_handler from platform code
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:27:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130123112746.GJ15873@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZnDi8F7Zu646CPEt9SAx5gA=v0CJ-Rq1eJqKS_s2EHvw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Linus Walleij
> <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Now MMCI on/off functionality is using the regulator framework
> >> from the MMCI driver, there is no need to keep the ios_handler
> >> laying around, duplicating functionality. So we're removing it.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >
> > Applied to my ux500-cleanups branch.
>
> Or no, wait, that is dependent or Russell's tree so will not
> be bisectable.
>
> Either submit sequel patches to [1/8] through Russell's
> patch tracker (based on his tree I guess) or wait for these
> to hit mainline and push them after that.
>
> Acked-by anway, on all of the cleanups following [1/8].
I have this queued already, with the MMCI patch in as a dependency.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-23 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-13 13:22 [PATCH 1/8] Functionality add and bug-fixes related to MMCI regulators Lee Jones
2012-12-13 13:22 ` Lee Jones
2012-12-13 13:22 ` [PATCH 1/8] mmc: mmci: Move ios_handler functionality into the driver Lee Jones
2012-12-13 13:22 ` Lee Jones
2013-01-21 14:06 ` Lee Jones
2013-01-21 14:06 ` Lee Jones
2013-01-21 20:25 ` Ulf Hansson
2013-01-21 20:25 ` Ulf Hansson
2013-01-22 8:46 ` Lee Jones
2013-01-22 8:46 ` Lee Jones
2012-12-13 13:22 ` [PATCH 2/8] ARM: ux500: Set correct MMCI regulator voltages in the ux5x0 Device Tree Lee Jones
2012-12-13 13:22 ` Lee Jones
2012-12-13 13:22 ` [PATCH 3/8] ARM: ux500: Specify the ux5x0 MMCI regulator's on/off GPIO as high-enable Lee Jones
2012-12-13 13:22 ` Lee Jones
2012-12-13 13:22 ` [PATCH 4/8] ARM: ux500: Specify which IOS regulator to use for MMCI Lee Jones
2012-12-13 13:22 ` Lee Jones
2012-12-13 13:22 ` [PATCH 5/8] ARM: ux500: Use the correct name when supplying a GPIO enable pin Lee Jones
2012-12-13 13:22 ` Lee Jones
2012-12-13 13:22 ` [PATCH 6/8] ARM: ux500: Setup correct settling time for the MMCI regulator Lee Jones
2012-12-13 13:22 ` Lee Jones
2012-12-13 13:22 ` [PATCH 7/8] ARM: ux500: Use the GPIO regulator framework for SDI0's 'en' and 'vsel' Lee Jones
2012-12-13 13:22 ` Lee Jones
2012-12-13 15:09 ` Ulf Hansson
2012-12-13 15:09 ` Ulf Hansson
2013-01-21 13:11 ` Lee Jones
2013-01-21 13:11 ` Lee Jones
2012-12-13 13:22 ` [PATCH 8/8] ARM: ux500: Remove traces of the ios_handler from platform code Lee Jones
2012-12-13 13:22 ` Lee Jones
2012-12-14 8:25 ` Ulf Hansson
2012-12-14 8:25 ` Ulf Hansson
2013-01-21 13:11 ` Lee Jones
2013-01-21 13:11 ` Lee Jones
2013-01-23 10:04 ` Linus Walleij
2013-01-23 10:04 ` Linus Walleij
2013-01-23 10:07 ` Linus Walleij
2013-01-23 10:07 ` Linus Walleij
2013-01-23 11:27 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2013-01-23 11:27 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130123112746.GJ15873@gmail.com \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.