From: Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Lord Glauber Costa of Sealand
<glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>,
cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] replace cgroup_lock with memcg specific locking
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:03:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130125160328.7a73849f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130125173701.GH3081-Gd/HAXX7CRxy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:37:01 -0800
Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 02:27:55PM +0400, Lord Glauber Costa of Sealand wrote:
> > > I would vote to -mm. Or is there any specific reason to have it in
> > > cgroup tree? It doesn't touch any cgroup core parts, does it?
> > >
> > Copying Andrew (retroactively sorry you weren't directly CCd on this one
> > as well).
> >
> > I depend on css_online and the cgroup generic iterator. If they are
> > already present @ -mm, then fine.
> > (looking now, they seem to be...)
>
> Yeah, they're all in cgroup/for-next so should be available in -mm, so
> I think -mm probably is the better tree to route these.
>
yep, grabbed, thanks.
The good changelogging and code commenting really help with review -
thanks for doing that. It's a shame so few people are interested in
reviewing them! (Hint).
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Lord Glauber Costa of Sealand <glommer@parallels.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] replace cgroup_lock with memcg specific locking
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:03:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130125160328.7a73849f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130125173701.GH3081@htj.dyndns.org>
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:37:01 -0800
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 02:27:55PM +0400, Lord Glauber Costa of Sealand wrote:
> > > I would vote to -mm. Or is there any specific reason to have it in
> > > cgroup tree? It doesn't touch any cgroup core parts, does it?
> > >
> > Copying Andrew (retroactively sorry you weren't directly CCd on this one
> > as well).
> >
> > I depend on css_online and the cgroup generic iterator. If they are
> > already present @ -mm, then fine.
> > (looking now, they seem to be...)
>
> Yeah, they're all in cgroup/for-next so should be available in -mm, so
> I think -mm probably is the better tree to route these.
>
yep, grabbed, thanks.
The good changelogging and code commenting really help with review -
thanks for doing that. It's a shame so few people are interested in
reviewing them! (Hint).
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-26 0:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-22 13:47 [PATCH v4 0/6] replace cgroup_lock with memcg specific locking Glauber Costa
2013-01-22 13:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] memcg: prevent changes to move_charge_at_immigrate during task attach Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <1358862461-18046-2-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-29 0:11 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-01-29 0:11 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-01-22 13:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] memcg: split part of memcg creation to css_online Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <1358862461-18046-3-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-25 23:52 ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-25 23:52 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20130125155249.402c40dd.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-28 8:35 ` Lord Glauber Costa of Sealand
2013-01-28 8:35 ` Lord Glauber Costa of Sealand
2013-01-29 0:12 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-01-29 0:12 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-01-22 13:47 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] memcg: fast hierarchy-aware child test Glauber Costa
2013-01-25 23:59 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20130125155901.4d3fb00c.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-28 8:30 ` Lord Glauber Costa of Sealand
2013-01-28 8:30 ` Lord Glauber Costa of Sealand
2013-01-29 0:14 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-01-22 13:47 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] memcg: replace cgroup_lock with memcg specific memcg_lock Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <1358862461-18046-5-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-22 14:00 ` Michal Hocko
2013-01-22 14:00 ` Michal Hocko
2013-01-29 0:16 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-01-29 0:16 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-01-22 13:47 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] memcg: increment static branch right after limit set Glauber Costa
2013-01-29 0:18 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-01-22 13:47 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] memcg: avoid dangling reference count in creation failure Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <1358862461-18046-7-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-22 14:00 ` Michal Hocko
2013-01-22 14:00 ` Michal Hocko
2013-01-29 0:22 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-01-29 0:22 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
[not found] ` <1358862461-18046-1-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-25 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] replace cgroup_lock with memcg specific locking Lord Glauber Costa of Sealand
2013-01-25 10:05 ` Lord Glauber Costa of Sealand
[not found] ` <510258D0.6060407-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-25 10:18 ` Michal Hocko
2013-01-25 10:18 ` Michal Hocko
2013-01-25 10:27 ` Lord Glauber Costa of Sealand
2013-01-25 17:37 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20130125173701.GH3081-Gd/HAXX7CRxy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-26 0:03 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2013-01-26 0:03 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130125160328.7a73849f.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm-de/tnxtf+jlsfhdxvbkv3wd2fqjk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.