All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: create macros for the "unclaimed register" checks
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:02:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130125170201.2ccb6af9@bwidawsk.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359147462-3902-2-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>

On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:57:36 -0200
Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> 
> This avoids polluting i915_write##x and also allows us to reuse code
> on i915_read##x.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index 9cc8f87..ae0a55a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -1224,6 +1224,20 @@ ilk_dummy_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	I915_WRITE_NOTRACE(MI_MODE, 0);
>  }
>  
> +#define UNCLAIMED_REG_CLEAR(dev_priv, reg) \
> +	if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv->dev) && \
> +	    (I915_READ_NOTRACE(GEN7_ERR_INT) & ERR_INT_MMIO_UNCLAIMED)) { \
> +		DRM_ERROR("Unknown unclaimed register before writing to %x\n", reg); \
> +		I915_WRITE_NOTRACE(GEN7_ERR_INT, ERR_INT_MMIO_UNCLAIMED); \
> +	}
> +

You don't really need the if here, do you? I think the way it worked
originally was fine.

> +#define UNCLAIMED_REG_CHECK(dev_priv, reg) \
> +	if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv->dev) && \
> +	    (I915_READ_NOTRACE(GEN7_ERR_INT) & ERR_INT_MMIO_UNCLAIMED)) { \
> +		DRM_ERROR("Unclaimed write to %x\n", reg); \
> +		writel(ERR_INT_MMIO_UNCLAIMED, dev_priv->regs + GEN7_ERR_INT);	\
> +	}
> +
>  #define __i915_read(x, y) \
>  u##x i915_read##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg) { \
>  	u##x val = 0; \

I suppose you could add some 'unlikely' predictions in another patch if
you wanted. I really don't know what the consensus is on using those
these day.

> @@ -1262,10 +1276,7 @@ void i915_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg, u##x val) { \
>  	} \
>  	if (IS_GEN5(dev_priv->dev)) \
>  		ilk_dummy_write(dev_priv); \
> -	if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv->dev) && (I915_READ_NOTRACE(GEN7_ERR_INT) & ERR_INT_MMIO_UNCLAIMED)) { \
> -		DRM_ERROR("Unknown unclaimed register before writing to %x\n", reg); \
> -		I915_WRITE_NOTRACE(GEN7_ERR_INT, ERR_INT_MMIO_UNCLAIMED); \
> -	} \
> +	UNCLAIMED_REG_CLEAR(dev_priv, reg); \
>  	if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv->dev) && IS_DISPLAYREG(reg)) { \
>  		write##y(val, dev_priv->regs + reg + 0x180000);		\
>  	} else {			\

Here's what I meant above, you replace 2 lines of code with 4 from the
macro. (Including an extra MMIO read).

> @@ -1274,10 +1285,7 @@ void i915_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg, u##x val) { \
>  	if (unlikely(__fifo_ret)) { \
>  		gen6_gt_check_fifodbg(dev_priv); \
>  	} \
> -	if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv->dev) && (I915_READ_NOTRACE(GEN7_ERR_INT) & ERR_INT_MMIO_UNCLAIMED)) { \
> -		DRM_ERROR("Unclaimed write to %x\n", reg); \
> -		writel(ERR_INT_MMIO_UNCLAIMED, dev_priv->regs + GEN7_ERR_INT);	\
> -	} \
> +	UNCLAIMED_REG_CHECK(dev_priv, reg); \
>  }
>  __i915_write(8, b)
>  __i915_write(16, w)



-- 
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-26  1:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-25 20:57 [PATCH 0/7] Unclaimed register reporting V2 Paulo Zanoni
2013-01-25 20:57 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: create macros for the "unclaimed register" checks Paulo Zanoni
2013-01-26  1:02   ` Ben Widawsky [this message]
2013-01-28 20:17     ` Ben Widawsky
2013-01-25 20:57 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: use FPGA_DBG " Paulo Zanoni
2013-01-26  1:03   ` Ben Widawsky
2013-01-25 20:57 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: clear the FPGA_DBG_RM_NOCLAIM bit at driver init Paulo Zanoni
2013-01-26  1:05   ` Ben Widawsky
2013-01-29 19:02   ` [PATCH 3/3] " Paulo Zanoni
2013-01-25 20:57 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: check for unclaimed registers on I915_READ too Paulo Zanoni
2013-01-25 20:57 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: WARN on unclaimed registers Paulo Zanoni
2013-01-26  1:11   ` Ben Widawsky
2013-01-25 20:57 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: only check for unclaimed registers if drm_debug Paulo Zanoni
2013-01-25 20:57 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: print Gen 7 error interrupts Paulo Zanoni
2013-01-26  1:24   ` Ben Widawsky
2013-02-08 18:22     ` Paulo Zanoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130125170201.2ccb6af9@bwidawsk.net \
    --to=ben@bwidawsk.net \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
    --cc=przanoni@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.