All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Christoffer Dall <chris@cloudcar.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	"Jeremy C. Andrus" <jeremya@cs.columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: mm: Fix alloc_init_section bug on LPAE
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 17:55:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130201175509.GK5151@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359160318-27068-1-git-send-email-chris@cloudcar.com>

On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:31:58AM +0000, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> When using LPAE the call to alloc_init_pte is passed then end address
> for the entire 1st level page table region, and the code unluckily ends
> up going over the bounds of the single allocated PTE, which is sad.
> 
> This caused LPAE boot on omap5 to crash.
> 
> There may be some hidden mystery in the boot code that I'm unaware of
> or it may be assumed that all mappings are always mappable as sections
> on LPAE and therefore omap5 just does something bad, in which case this
> patch isn't the right fix, but I'd be happy to be told the reason.
> 
> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> Cc: Jeremy C. Andrus <jeremya@cs.columbia.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <chris@cloudcar.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mm/mmu.c |   12 +++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> index ce328c7..1cecc99 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -603,11 +603,13 @@ static void __init alloc_init_section(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
>  
>  		flush_pmd_entry(p);
>  	} else {
> -		/*
> -		 * No need to loop; pte's aren't interested in the
> -		 * individual L1 entries.
> -		 */
> -		alloc_init_pte(pmd, addr, end, __phys_to_pfn(phys), type);
> +		unsigned long next;
> +
> +		do {
> +			next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
> +			alloc_init_pte(pmd, addr, next, __phys_to_pfn(phys), type);
> +			phys += next - addr;
> +		} while (pmd++, addr = next, addr != end);

I now noticed your patch (I'm a bit behind with the list). It looks to
me like it should work since next == end with the classic MMU, so we
only go through the loop once.

-- 
Catalin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ARM: mm: Fix alloc_init_section bug on LPAE
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 17:55:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130201175509.GK5151@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359160318-27068-1-git-send-email-chris@cloudcar.com>

On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:31:58AM +0000, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> When using LPAE the call to alloc_init_pte is passed then end address
> for the entire 1st level page table region, and the code unluckily ends
> up going over the bounds of the single allocated PTE, which is sad.
> 
> This caused LPAE boot on omap5 to crash.
> 
> There may be some hidden mystery in the boot code that I'm unaware of
> or it may be assumed that all mappings are always mappable as sections
> on LPAE and therefore omap5 just does something bad, in which case this
> patch isn't the right fix, but I'd be happy to be told the reason.
> 
> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> Cc: Jeremy C. Andrus <jeremya@cs.columbia.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <chris@cloudcar.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mm/mmu.c |   12 +++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> index ce328c7..1cecc99 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -603,11 +603,13 @@ static void __init alloc_init_section(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
>  
>  		flush_pmd_entry(p);
>  	} else {
> -		/*
> -		 * No need to loop; pte's aren't interested in the
> -		 * individual L1 entries.
> -		 */
> -		alloc_init_pte(pmd, addr, end, __phys_to_pfn(phys), type);
> +		unsigned long next;
> +
> +		do {
> +			next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
> +			alloc_init_pte(pmd, addr, next, __phys_to_pfn(phys), type);
> +			phys += next - addr;
> +		} while (pmd++, addr = next, addr != end);

I now noticed your patch (I'm a bit behind with the list). It looks to
me like it should work since next == end with the classic MMU, so we
only go through the loop once.

-- 
Catalin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-01 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-26  0:31 [RFC PATCH] ARM: mm: Fix alloc_init_section bug on LPAE Christoffer Dall
2013-01-26  0:31 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-26  4:50 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-26  4:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-26  6:15   ` Christoffer Dall
2013-01-26  6:15     ` Christoffer Dall
2013-02-01 17:55 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2013-02-01 17:55   ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130201175509.GK5151@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chris@cloudcar.com \
    --cc=jeremya@cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.