From: Anson Huang <b20788@freescale.com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] cpufreq: add imx6q-cpufreq driver
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 11:06:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130204160622.GB5209@ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359946302-25953-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org>
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:51:42AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Add an imx6q-cpufreq driver for Freescale i.MX6Q SoC to handle the
> hardware specific frequency and voltage scaling requirements.
>
> The driver supports module build and is instantiated by the platform
> device/driver mechanism, so that it will not be instantiated on other
> platforms, as IMX is built with multiplatform support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> Changes since v4:
> * Use regulator API to handle voltage latency
>
> Rafael,
>
> I generated the patch against your bleeding-edge branch, so it should
> be applied cleanly.
>
> Shawn
>
> drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 9 ++
> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 331 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 341 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> index ffe55b8..c65226c 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> @@ -77,6 +77,15 @@ config ARM_EXYNOS5250_CPUFREQ
> This adds the CPUFreq driver for Samsung EXYNOS5250
> SoC.
>
> +config ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ
> + tristate "Freescale i.MX6Q cpufreq support"
> + depends on SOC_IMX6Q
> + depends on REGULATOR_ANATOP
> + help
> + This adds cpufreq driver support for Freescale i.MX6Q SOC.
> +
> + If in doubt, say N.
> +
> config ARM_SPEAR_CPUFREQ
> bool "SPEAr CPUFreq support"
> depends on PLAT_SPEAR
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
> index e2a5da7..93610b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS5250_CPUFREQ) += exynos5250-cpufreq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_OMAP2PLUS_CPUFREQ) += omap-cpufreq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SPEAR_CPUFREQ) += spear-cpufreq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HIGHBANK_CPUFREQ) += highbank-cpufreq.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ) += imx6q-cpufreq.o
>
> ##################################################################################
> # PowerPC platform drivers
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f73b245
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,331 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/opp.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> +
> +#define PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_NORMAL 1250000
> +#define PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_HIGH 1275000
> +#define FREQ_1P2_GHZ 1200000000
> +
> +static struct regulator *arm_reg;
> +static struct regulator *pu_reg;
> +static struct regulator *soc_reg;
> +
> +static struct clk *arm_clk;
> +static struct clk *pll1_sys_clk;
> +static struct clk *pll1_sw_clk;
> +static struct clk *step_clk;
> +static struct clk *pll2_pfd2_396m_clk;
> +
> +static struct device *cpu_dev;
> +static struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
> +static unsigned int transition_latency;
> +
> +static int imx6q_verify_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> + return cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(policy, freq_table);
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int imx6q_get_speed(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + return clk_get_rate(arm_clk) / 1000;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx6q_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> + unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation)
> +{
> + struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> + struct opp *opp;
> + unsigned long freq_hz, volt, volt_old;
> + unsigned int index, cpu;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_table, target_freq,
> + relation, &index);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to match target frequency %d: %d\n",
> + target_freq, ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
> + freq_hz = freqs.new * 1000;
> + freqs.old = clk_get_rate(arm_clk) / 1000;
> +
> + if (freqs.old == freqs.new)
> + return 0;
> +
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> + freqs.cpu = cpu;
> + cpufreq_notify_transition(&freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
> + }
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + opp = opp_find_freq_ceil(cpu_dev, &freq_hz);
> + if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to find OPP for %ld\n", freq_hz);
> + return PTR_ERR(opp);
> + }
> +
> + volt = opp_get_voltage(opp);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + volt_old = regulator_get_voltage(arm_reg);
> +
> + dev_dbg(cpu_dev, "%u MHz, %ld mV --> %u MHz, %ld mV\n",
> + freqs.old / 1000, volt_old / 1000,
> + freqs.new / 1000, volt / 1000);
> +
> + /* scaling up? scale voltage before frequency */
> + if (freqs.new > freqs.old) {
> + ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(arm_reg, volt, 0);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(cpu_dev,
> + "failed to scale vddarm up: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Need to increase vddpu and vddsoc for safety
> + * if we are about to run at 1.2 GHz.
> + */
> + if (freqs.new == FREQ_1P2_GHZ / 1000) {
> + regulator_set_voltage_tol(pu_reg,
> + PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_HIGH, 0);
> + regulator_set_voltage_tol(soc_reg,
> + PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_HIGH, 0);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * The setpoints are selected per PLL/PDF frequencies, so we need to
> + * reprogram PLL for frequency scaling. The procedure of reprogramming
> + * PLL1 is as below.
> + *
> + * - Enable pll2_pfd2_396m_clk and reparent pll1_sw_clk to it
> + * - Disable pll1_sys_clk and reprogram it
> + * - Enable pll1_sys_clk and reparent pll1_sw_clk back to it
> + * - Disable pll2_pfd2_396m_clk
> + */
> + clk_prepare_enable(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk);
> + clk_set_parent(step_clk, pll2_pfd2_396m_clk);
> + clk_set_parent(pll1_sw_clk, step_clk);
> + clk_prepare_enable(pll1_sys_clk);
> + if (freq_hz > clk_get_rate(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk)) {
> + clk_disable_unprepare(pll1_sys_clk);
> + clk_set_rate(pll1_sys_clk, freqs.new * 1000);
> + clk_prepare_enable(pll1_sys_clk);
> + clk_set_parent(pll1_sw_clk, pll1_sys_clk);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Disable pll1_sys_clk if pll2_pfd2_396m_clk is sufficient
> + * to provide the frequency.
> + */
> + clk_disable_unprepare(pll1_sys_clk);
> + }
Seems like we will get pll2_pfd2_396m_clk's use count mismatch? As every time cpu freq is changed, pll2_pfd2_396m_clk will be added at the beginning of this code piece, but only decreased when cpu freq > 396M, so everytime cpu freq changed to 396M, this pll2_pfd2_396m_clk will in increased?
> +
> + /* Ensure the arm clock divider is what we expect */
> + ret = clk_set_rate(arm_clk, freqs.new * 1000);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to set clock rate: %d\n", ret);
> + regulator_set_voltage_tol(arm_reg, volt_old, 0);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /* scaling down? scale voltage after frequency */
> + if (freqs.new < freqs.old) {
> + ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(arm_reg, volt, 0);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(cpu_dev,
> + "failed to scale vddarm down: %d\n", ret);
> +
> + if (freqs.old == FREQ_1P2_GHZ / 1000) {
> + regulator_set_voltage_tol(pu_reg,
> + PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_NORMAL, 0);
> + regulator_set_voltage_tol(soc_reg,
> + PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_NORMAL, 0);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> + freqs.cpu = cpu;
> + cpufreq_notify_transition(&freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
> + }
> +
Should we need to update the percpu loops_per_jiffy variable and global loops_per_jiffy? As the udelay and mdelay will rely on this global loops_per_jiffy? Or the latest kernel has handle it in other place such as cpufreq common driver? I remembered that common cpufreq driver only handle the noSMP case.
Anson
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx6q_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, freq_table);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "invalid frequency table: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = transition_latency;
> + policy->cur = clk_get_rate(arm_clk) / 1000;
> + cpumask_setall(policy->cpus);
> + cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(freq_table, policy->cpu);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx6q_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> + cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr(policy->cpu);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct freq_attr *imx6q_cpufreq_attr[] = {
> + &cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_available_freqs,
> + NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static struct cpufreq_driver imx6q_cpufreq_driver = {
> + .verify = imx6q_verify_speed,
> + .target = imx6q_set_target,
> + .get = imx6q_get_speed,
> + .init = imx6q_cpufreq_init,
> + .exit = imx6q_cpufreq_exit,
> + .name = "imx6q-cpufreq",
> + .attr = imx6q_cpufreq_attr,
> +};
> +
> +static int imx6q_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np;
> + struct opp *opp;
> + unsigned long min_volt, max_volt;
> + int num, ret;
> +
> + cpu_dev = &pdev->dev;
> +
> + np = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus/cpu@0");
> + if (!np) {
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to find cpu0 node\n");
> + return -ENOENT;
> + }
> +
> + cpu_dev->of_node = np;
> +
> + arm_clk = devm_clk_get(cpu_dev, "arm");
> + pll1_sys_clk = devm_clk_get(cpu_dev, "pll1_sys");
> + pll1_sw_clk = devm_clk_get(cpu_dev, "pll1_sw");
> + step_clk = devm_clk_get(cpu_dev, "step");
> + pll2_pfd2_396m_clk = devm_clk_get(cpu_dev, "pll2_pfd2_396m");
> + if (IS_ERR(arm_clk) || IS_ERR(pll1_sys_clk) || IS_ERR(pll1_sw_clk) ||
> + IS_ERR(step_clk) || IS_ERR(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk)) {
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to get clocks\n");
> + ret = -ENOENT;
> + goto put_node;
> + }
> +
> + arm_reg = devm_regulator_get(cpu_dev, "arm");
> + pu_reg = devm_regulator_get(cpu_dev, "pu");
> + soc_reg = devm_regulator_get(cpu_dev, "soc");
> + if (!arm_reg || !pu_reg || !soc_reg) {
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to get regulators\n");
> + ret = -ENOENT;
> + goto put_node;
> + }
> +
> + /* We expect an OPP table supplied by platform */
> + num = opp_get_opp_count(cpu_dev);
> + if (num < 0) {
> + ret = num;
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "no OPP table is found: %d\n", ret);
> + goto put_node;
> + }
> +
> + ret = opp_init_cpufreq_table(cpu_dev, &freq_table);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to init cpufreq table: %d\n", ret);
> + goto put_node;
> + }
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-latency", &transition_latency))
> + transition_latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL;
> +
> + /*
> + * OPP is maintained in order of increasing frequency, and
> + * freq_table initialised from OPP is therefore sorted in the
> + * same order.
> + */
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + opp = opp_find_freq_exact(cpu_dev,
> + freq_table[0].frequency * 1000, true);
> + min_volt = opp_get_voltage(opp);
> + opp = opp_find_freq_exact(cpu_dev,
> + freq_table[--num].frequency * 1000, true);
> + max_volt = opp_get_voltage(opp);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + ret = regulator_set_voltage_time(arm_reg, min_volt, max_volt);
> + if (ret > 0)
> + transition_latency += ret * 1000;
> +
> + /* Count vddpu and vddsoc latency in for 1.2 GHz support */
> + if (freq_table[num].frequency == FREQ_1P2_GHZ / 1000) {
> + ret = regulator_set_voltage_time(pu_reg, PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_NORMAL,
> + PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_HIGH);
> + if (ret > 0)
> + transition_latency += ret * 1000;
> + ret = regulator_set_voltage_time(soc_reg, PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_NORMAL,
> + PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_HIGH);
> + if (ret > 0)
> + transition_latency += ret * 1000;
> + }
> +
> + ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&imx6q_cpufreq_driver);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed register driver: %d\n", ret);
> + goto free_freq_table;
> + }
> +
> + of_node_put(np);
> + return 0;
> +
> +free_freq_table:
> + opp_free_cpufreq_table(cpu_dev, &freq_table);
> +put_node:
> + of_node_put(np);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx6q_cpufreq_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + cpufreq_unregister_driver(&imx6q_cpufreq_driver);
> + opp_free_cpufreq_table(cpu_dev, &freq_table);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver imx6q_cpufreq_platdrv = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "imx6q-cpufreq",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + },
> + .probe = imx6q_cpufreq_probe,
> + .remove = imx6q_cpufreq_remove,
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(imx6q_cpufreq_platdrv);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Freescale i.MX6Q cpufreq driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: b20788@freescale.com (Anson Huang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5] cpufreq: add imx6q-cpufreq driver
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 11:06:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130204160622.GB5209@ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359946302-25953-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org>
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:51:42AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Add an imx6q-cpufreq driver for Freescale i.MX6Q SoC to handle the
> hardware specific frequency and voltage scaling requirements.
>
> The driver supports module build and is instantiated by the platform
> device/driver mechanism, so that it will not be instantiated on other
> platforms, as IMX is built with multiplatform support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> Changes since v4:
> * Use regulator API to handle voltage latency
>
> Rafael,
>
> I generated the patch against your bleeding-edge branch, so it should
> be applied cleanly.
>
> Shawn
>
> drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 9 ++
> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 331 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 341 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> index ffe55b8..c65226c 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> @@ -77,6 +77,15 @@ config ARM_EXYNOS5250_CPUFREQ
> This adds the CPUFreq driver for Samsung EXYNOS5250
> SoC.
>
> +config ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ
> + tristate "Freescale i.MX6Q cpufreq support"
> + depends on SOC_IMX6Q
> + depends on REGULATOR_ANATOP
> + help
> + This adds cpufreq driver support for Freescale i.MX6Q SOC.
> +
> + If in doubt, say N.
> +
> config ARM_SPEAR_CPUFREQ
> bool "SPEAr CPUFreq support"
> depends on PLAT_SPEAR
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
> index e2a5da7..93610b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS5250_CPUFREQ) += exynos5250-cpufreq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_OMAP2PLUS_CPUFREQ) += omap-cpufreq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SPEAR_CPUFREQ) += spear-cpufreq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HIGHBANK_CPUFREQ) += highbank-cpufreq.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ) += imx6q-cpufreq.o
>
> ##################################################################################
> # PowerPC platform drivers
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f73b245
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,331 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/opp.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> +
> +#define PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_NORMAL 1250000
> +#define PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_HIGH 1275000
> +#define FREQ_1P2_GHZ 1200000000
> +
> +static struct regulator *arm_reg;
> +static struct regulator *pu_reg;
> +static struct regulator *soc_reg;
> +
> +static struct clk *arm_clk;
> +static struct clk *pll1_sys_clk;
> +static struct clk *pll1_sw_clk;
> +static struct clk *step_clk;
> +static struct clk *pll2_pfd2_396m_clk;
> +
> +static struct device *cpu_dev;
> +static struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
> +static unsigned int transition_latency;
> +
> +static int imx6q_verify_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> + return cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(policy, freq_table);
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int imx6q_get_speed(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + return clk_get_rate(arm_clk) / 1000;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx6q_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> + unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation)
> +{
> + struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> + struct opp *opp;
> + unsigned long freq_hz, volt, volt_old;
> + unsigned int index, cpu;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_table, target_freq,
> + relation, &index);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to match target frequency %d: %d\n",
> + target_freq, ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
> + freq_hz = freqs.new * 1000;
> + freqs.old = clk_get_rate(arm_clk) / 1000;
> +
> + if (freqs.old == freqs.new)
> + return 0;
> +
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> + freqs.cpu = cpu;
> + cpufreq_notify_transition(&freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
> + }
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + opp = opp_find_freq_ceil(cpu_dev, &freq_hz);
> + if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to find OPP for %ld\n", freq_hz);
> + return PTR_ERR(opp);
> + }
> +
> + volt = opp_get_voltage(opp);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + volt_old = regulator_get_voltage(arm_reg);
> +
> + dev_dbg(cpu_dev, "%u MHz, %ld mV --> %u MHz, %ld mV\n",
> + freqs.old / 1000, volt_old / 1000,
> + freqs.new / 1000, volt / 1000);
> +
> + /* scaling up? scale voltage before frequency */
> + if (freqs.new > freqs.old) {
> + ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(arm_reg, volt, 0);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(cpu_dev,
> + "failed to scale vddarm up: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Need to increase vddpu and vddsoc for safety
> + * if we are about to run at 1.2 GHz.
> + */
> + if (freqs.new == FREQ_1P2_GHZ / 1000) {
> + regulator_set_voltage_tol(pu_reg,
> + PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_HIGH, 0);
> + regulator_set_voltage_tol(soc_reg,
> + PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_HIGH, 0);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * The setpoints are selected per PLL/PDF frequencies, so we need to
> + * reprogram PLL for frequency scaling. The procedure of reprogramming
> + * PLL1 is as below.
> + *
> + * - Enable pll2_pfd2_396m_clk and reparent pll1_sw_clk to it
> + * - Disable pll1_sys_clk and reprogram it
> + * - Enable pll1_sys_clk and reparent pll1_sw_clk back to it
> + * - Disable pll2_pfd2_396m_clk
> + */
> + clk_prepare_enable(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk);
> + clk_set_parent(step_clk, pll2_pfd2_396m_clk);
> + clk_set_parent(pll1_sw_clk, step_clk);
> + clk_prepare_enable(pll1_sys_clk);
> + if (freq_hz > clk_get_rate(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk)) {
> + clk_disable_unprepare(pll1_sys_clk);
> + clk_set_rate(pll1_sys_clk, freqs.new * 1000);
> + clk_prepare_enable(pll1_sys_clk);
> + clk_set_parent(pll1_sw_clk, pll1_sys_clk);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Disable pll1_sys_clk if pll2_pfd2_396m_clk is sufficient
> + * to provide the frequency.
> + */
> + clk_disable_unprepare(pll1_sys_clk);
> + }
Seems like we will get pll2_pfd2_396m_clk's use count mismatch? As every time cpu freq is changed, pll2_pfd2_396m_clk will be added at the beginning of this code piece, but only decreased when cpu freq > 396M, so everytime cpu freq changed to 396M, this pll2_pfd2_396m_clk will in increased?
> +
> + /* Ensure the arm clock divider is what we expect */
> + ret = clk_set_rate(arm_clk, freqs.new * 1000);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to set clock rate: %d\n", ret);
> + regulator_set_voltage_tol(arm_reg, volt_old, 0);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /* scaling down? scale voltage after frequency */
> + if (freqs.new < freqs.old) {
> + ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(arm_reg, volt, 0);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(cpu_dev,
> + "failed to scale vddarm down: %d\n", ret);
> +
> + if (freqs.old == FREQ_1P2_GHZ / 1000) {
> + regulator_set_voltage_tol(pu_reg,
> + PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_NORMAL, 0);
> + regulator_set_voltage_tol(soc_reg,
> + PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_NORMAL, 0);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> + freqs.cpu = cpu;
> + cpufreq_notify_transition(&freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
> + }
> +
Should we need to update the percpu loops_per_jiffy variable and global loops_per_jiffy? As the udelay and mdelay will rely on this global loops_per_jiffy? Or the latest kernel has handle it in other place such as cpufreq common driver? I remembered that common cpufreq driver only handle the noSMP case.
Anson
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx6q_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, freq_table);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "invalid frequency table: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = transition_latency;
> + policy->cur = clk_get_rate(arm_clk) / 1000;
> + cpumask_setall(policy->cpus);
> + cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(freq_table, policy->cpu);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx6q_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> + cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr(policy->cpu);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct freq_attr *imx6q_cpufreq_attr[] = {
> + &cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_available_freqs,
> + NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static struct cpufreq_driver imx6q_cpufreq_driver = {
> + .verify = imx6q_verify_speed,
> + .target = imx6q_set_target,
> + .get = imx6q_get_speed,
> + .init = imx6q_cpufreq_init,
> + .exit = imx6q_cpufreq_exit,
> + .name = "imx6q-cpufreq",
> + .attr = imx6q_cpufreq_attr,
> +};
> +
> +static int imx6q_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np;
> + struct opp *opp;
> + unsigned long min_volt, max_volt;
> + int num, ret;
> +
> + cpu_dev = &pdev->dev;
> +
> + np = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus/cpu at 0");
> + if (!np) {
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to find cpu0 node\n");
> + return -ENOENT;
> + }
> +
> + cpu_dev->of_node = np;
> +
> + arm_clk = devm_clk_get(cpu_dev, "arm");
> + pll1_sys_clk = devm_clk_get(cpu_dev, "pll1_sys");
> + pll1_sw_clk = devm_clk_get(cpu_dev, "pll1_sw");
> + step_clk = devm_clk_get(cpu_dev, "step");
> + pll2_pfd2_396m_clk = devm_clk_get(cpu_dev, "pll2_pfd2_396m");
> + if (IS_ERR(arm_clk) || IS_ERR(pll1_sys_clk) || IS_ERR(pll1_sw_clk) ||
> + IS_ERR(step_clk) || IS_ERR(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk)) {
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to get clocks\n");
> + ret = -ENOENT;
> + goto put_node;
> + }
> +
> + arm_reg = devm_regulator_get(cpu_dev, "arm");
> + pu_reg = devm_regulator_get(cpu_dev, "pu");
> + soc_reg = devm_regulator_get(cpu_dev, "soc");
> + if (!arm_reg || !pu_reg || !soc_reg) {
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to get regulators\n");
> + ret = -ENOENT;
> + goto put_node;
> + }
> +
> + /* We expect an OPP table supplied by platform */
> + num = opp_get_opp_count(cpu_dev);
> + if (num < 0) {
> + ret = num;
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "no OPP table is found: %d\n", ret);
> + goto put_node;
> + }
> +
> + ret = opp_init_cpufreq_table(cpu_dev, &freq_table);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to init cpufreq table: %d\n", ret);
> + goto put_node;
> + }
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-latency", &transition_latency))
> + transition_latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL;
> +
> + /*
> + * OPP is maintained in order of increasing frequency, and
> + * freq_table initialised from OPP is therefore sorted in the
> + * same order.
> + */
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + opp = opp_find_freq_exact(cpu_dev,
> + freq_table[0].frequency * 1000, true);
> + min_volt = opp_get_voltage(opp);
> + opp = opp_find_freq_exact(cpu_dev,
> + freq_table[--num].frequency * 1000, true);
> + max_volt = opp_get_voltage(opp);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + ret = regulator_set_voltage_time(arm_reg, min_volt, max_volt);
> + if (ret > 0)
> + transition_latency += ret * 1000;
> +
> + /* Count vddpu and vddsoc latency in for 1.2 GHz support */
> + if (freq_table[num].frequency == FREQ_1P2_GHZ / 1000) {
> + ret = regulator_set_voltage_time(pu_reg, PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_NORMAL,
> + PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_HIGH);
> + if (ret > 0)
> + transition_latency += ret * 1000;
> + ret = regulator_set_voltage_time(soc_reg, PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_NORMAL,
> + PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_HIGH);
> + if (ret > 0)
> + transition_latency += ret * 1000;
> + }
> +
> + ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&imx6q_cpufreq_driver);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed register driver: %d\n", ret);
> + goto free_freq_table;
> + }
> +
> + of_node_put(np);
> + return 0;
> +
> +free_freq_table:
> + opp_free_cpufreq_table(cpu_dev, &freq_table);
> +put_node:
> + of_node_put(np);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx6q_cpufreq_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + cpufreq_unregister_driver(&imx6q_cpufreq_driver);
> + opp_free_cpufreq_table(cpu_dev, &freq_table);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver imx6q_cpufreq_platdrv = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "imx6q-cpufreq",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + },
> + .probe = imx6q_cpufreq_probe,
> + .remove = imx6q_cpufreq_remove,
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(imx6q_cpufreq_platdrv);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Freescale i.MX6Q cpufreq driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-04 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-04 2:51 [PATCH v5] cpufreq: add imx6q-cpufreq driver Shawn Guo
2013-02-04 2:51 ` Shawn Guo
2013-02-04 16:06 ` Anson Huang [this message]
2013-02-04 16:06 ` Anson Huang
2013-02-04 5:09 ` Shawn Guo
2013-02-04 5:09 ` Shawn Guo
2013-02-04 18:40 ` Anson Huang
2013-02-04 18:40 ` Anson Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130204160622.GB5209@ubuntu \
--to=b20788@freescale.com \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.