All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: don't overwrite mm->def_flags in do_mlockall()
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:59:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130207135904.0ca7a3d5@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130206125103.61748ed0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Wed, 6 Feb 2013 12:51:03 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Wed,  6 Feb 2013 16:49:34 +0100
> Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > With commit 8e72033 "thp: make MADV_HUGEPAGE check for
> > mm->def_flags" the VM_NOHUGEPAGE flag may be set on s390 in
> > mm->def_flags for certain processes, to prevent future thp
> > mappings. This would be overwritten by do_mlockall(), which sets it
> > back to 0 with an optional VM_LOCKED flag set.
> > 
> > To fix this, instead of overwriting mm->def_flags in do_mlockall(),
> > only the VM_LOCKED flag should be set or cleared.
> 
> What are the user-visible effects here?  Looking at the 274023da1e8
> changelog, I'm guessing that it might be pretty nasty - kvm breakage?

Yes, though at the moment there should be no mlockall()/munlockall()
involved with kvm/qemu. So currently no user-visible effects, Vivek
found this while reading the do_mlockall() code, but it might be a
good idea to add this to stable.
Could you add a "Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.7+"?

Thanks,
Gerald

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: don't overwrite mm->def_flags in do_mlockall()
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:59:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130207135904.0ca7a3d5@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130206125103.61748ed0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Wed, 6 Feb 2013 12:51:03 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Wed,  6 Feb 2013 16:49:34 +0100
> Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > With commit 8e72033 "thp: make MADV_HUGEPAGE check for
> > mm->def_flags" the VM_NOHUGEPAGE flag may be set on s390 in
> > mm->def_flags for certain processes, to prevent future thp
> > mappings. This would be overwritten by do_mlockall(), which sets it
> > back to 0 with an optional VM_LOCKED flag set.
> > 
> > To fix this, instead of overwriting mm->def_flags in do_mlockall(),
> > only the VM_LOCKED flag should be set or cleared.
> 
> What are the user-visible effects here?  Looking at the 274023da1e8
> changelog, I'm guessing that it might be pretty nasty - kvm breakage?

Yes, though at the moment there should be no mlockall()/munlockall()
involved with kvm/qemu. So currently no user-visible effects, Vivek
found this while reading the do_mlockall() code, but it might be a
good idea to add this to stable.
Could you add a "Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.7+"?

Thanks,
Gerald


  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-07 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-06 15:49 [PATCH] mm: don't overwrite mm->def_flags in do_mlockall() Gerald Schaefer
2013-02-06 15:49 ` Gerald Schaefer
2013-02-06 20:51 ` Andrew Morton
2013-02-06 20:51   ` Andrew Morton
2013-02-07 12:59   ` Gerald Schaefer [this message]
2013-02-07 12:59     ` Gerald Schaefer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130207135904.0ca7a3d5@thinkpad \
    --to=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.