From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: omap: board-h4: remove warning for is_gpmc_muxed
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 08:49:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130212164910.GF4801@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1360640836-18792-1-git-send-email-olof@lixom.net>
* Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> [130211 19:51]:
> If the ethernet driver is not selected, you otherwise get:
>
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-h4.c:237:12: warning: 'is_gpmc_muxed' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>
> I guess it could be argued that the device setup should/could always
> be done even if the driver isn't enabled, but hopefully the board files
> will all go away some day so let's stick to the smaller delta.
Looks right to me. The only thing stopping us from removing board-h4.c
is the GPMC + smc91x DT binding for NFS root. I doubt anybody is using
H4 for anything else.
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-h4.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-h4.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-h4.c
> index 812c829..e34541d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-h4.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-h4.c
> @@ -229,6 +229,8 @@ static u32 get_sysboot_value(void)
> OMAP2_SYSBOOT_1_MASK | OMAP2_SYSBOOT_0_MASK));
> }
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SMC91X) || defined(CONFIG_SMC91x_MODULE)
> +
> /* H4-2420's always used muxed mode, H4-2422's always use non-muxed
> *
> * Note: OMAP-GIT doesn't correctly do is_cpu_omap2422 and is_cpu_omap2423
> @@ -246,8 +248,6 @@ static u32 is_gpmc_muxed(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_SMC91X) || defined(CONFIG_SMC91x_MODULE)
> -
> static struct omap_smc91x_platform_data board_smc91x_data = {
> .cs = 1,
> .gpio_irq = 92,
> --
> 1.8.1.192.gc4361b8
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: omap: board-h4: remove warning for is_gpmc_muxed
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 08:49:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130212164910.GF4801@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1360640836-18792-1-git-send-email-olof@lixom.net>
* Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> [130211 19:51]:
> If the ethernet driver is not selected, you otherwise get:
>
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-h4.c:237:12: warning: 'is_gpmc_muxed' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>
> I guess it could be argued that the device setup should/could always
> be done even if the driver isn't enabled, but hopefully the board files
> will all go away some day so let's stick to the smaller delta.
Looks right to me. The only thing stopping us from removing board-h4.c
is the GPMC + smc91x DT binding for NFS root. I doubt anybody is using
H4 for anything else.
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-h4.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-h4.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-h4.c
> index 812c829..e34541d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-h4.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-h4.c
> @@ -229,6 +229,8 @@ static u32 get_sysboot_value(void)
> OMAP2_SYSBOOT_1_MASK | OMAP2_SYSBOOT_0_MASK));
> }
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SMC91X) || defined(CONFIG_SMC91x_MODULE)
> +
> /* H4-2420's always used muxed mode, H4-2422's always use non-muxed
> *
> * Note: OMAP-GIT doesn't correctly do is_cpu_omap2422 and is_cpu_omap2423
> @@ -246,8 +248,6 @@ static u32 is_gpmc_muxed(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_SMC91X) || defined(CONFIG_SMC91x_MODULE)
> -
> static struct omap_smc91x_platform_data board_smc91x_data = {
> .cs = 1,
> .gpio_irq = 92,
> --
> 1.8.1.192.gc4361b8
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-12 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-12 3:47 [PATCH] ARM: omap: board-h4: remove warning for is_gpmc_muxed Olof Johansson
2013-02-12 3:47 ` Olof Johansson
2013-02-12 16:49 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2013-02-12 16:49 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130212164910.GF4801@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.